|
Post by punksnotdead on Sept 28, 2016 20:18:13 GMT -5
|
|
Mikeo
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 11, 2014 15:59:38 GMT -5
Posts: 612
|
Post by Mikeo on Sept 28, 2016 20:23:29 GMT -5
Hahahaha, No.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Sept 28, 2016 20:59:00 GMT -5
Too soon but more then likely she will be in time. She's better on the mic then 98% of womens wrestler that have been around in the last 30 years. Her athleticism is 2nd to none. She's only been in the ring for a little over 3 years. Her ring work is already some of the best in the womens division and will only get better. Even with only 3yrs experience there is only a handful of WWE Women in history that are as good or better than her in the ring, most of which are currently wrestling Sherri Martel & Madusa being the other two.
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Sept 28, 2016 21:16:36 GMT -5
"Greatest"
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Sept 28, 2016 21:56:38 GMT -5
I don't get the hype behind Charlotte. Austin and a lot of others love her. I just don't see it. I feel like Sasha, Bayley, and Becky are miles ahead of her. I honestly feel like being a Flair is a huge part of her push.
|
|
|
Post by ARUN on Sept 28, 2016 22:22:20 GMT -5
When her career is done.. Perhaps but no way at this point is she the greatest ever. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Sept 28, 2016 23:38:29 GMT -5
Most accomplished, yeah probably. It's ridiculous, she's been champion non-stop since this time last year, save for maybe 3 weeks. I don't get the hype behind Charlotte. Austin and a lot of others love her. I just don't see it. I feel like Sasha, Bayley, and Becky are miles ahead of her. I honestly feel like being a Flair is a huge part of her push. That's just it.. she's where she is because of her dad.. and yeah, she's good. Maybe really good.. but she is NOT the best, and I don't think I'd even put her in the top 5 of the modern Women's roster. She's good, she is not good enough to have been champion for an entire year at the expense of all the other women.
|
|
jacktunney
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 3, 2012 22:50:33 GMT -5
Posts: 735
|
Post by jacktunney on Sept 28, 2016 23:51:32 GMT -5
IMO She is far and away better than the rest of the main roster female wrestlers right now.
|
|
|
Post by hbkjason on Sept 29, 2016 4:28:18 GMT -5
From an in ring point of view I actually find her one of the weakest. She may be a great athlete, but 90 percent of her moves look so damn fake and weak her slams and suplexes in particular are some of the fakest looking moves I have ever seen! I am not saying she is bad, but I do feel she is one of the weakest divas they have right now from an in ring point of view.
On the flip side though as a character I feel she is one of the best they have. She plays the bitch role so well and it makes you want to see her get her butt handed to her so that she does well. But she is a million miles away from this amazing ring technician that people make her out to be.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 6:38:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2016 5:55:39 GMT -5
Better than Sasha and Bayley.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Sept 29, 2016 9:42:59 GMT -5
This is hyperbolic garbage.
But she's far better than she's usually given credit for. Except for her miserable selling.
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Sept 29, 2016 9:50:15 GMT -5
I have said this many times here. You are only as good as your opponent. It all boils down to how your pros can shine and your cons are hidden. As I said before, Charlotte is good but not great. She is grasping the industry at her pace. I feel Charlotte and Becky Lynch have been the two most consistent females in the last year. Sasha Banks' work just get's worse and worse. One of her best matches was against Becky Lynch at TakeOver: Unstoppable. Why is that so? Becky Lynch knows how to control the pacing of a match. Becky Lynch carried that match, not Sasha Banks.
|
|
maske2g
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 31, 2011 7:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 2,972
|
Post by maske2g on Sept 29, 2016 9:59:55 GMT -5
Charlotte is exceptional, particularly when you consider her relative inexperience.
Ric Flair got her in the door, but to use that as the reason that she is top of the tree is utter b0ll0x.
It's nice to be nostalgic about Wendi, and Sherry etc etc. But they were absolutely SHYTE in the ring!!!
The quality of the womens matches is now better than ever, hence it's not undfair to say she is the best ever already.
Saying that, the match on Sunday was shyte. Lacklustre. Again, caused by not enough build and story telling, as well as making Bayley look weak as F.
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Sept 29, 2016 23:00:08 GMT -5
I am echoing the same things you mentioned. Whoever wrote this Forbes article obviously never saw her work on NXT. You don't get good on the mic overnight and Charlotte is a prime example of that. I can sense she is finally getting comfortable talking on the stick. Charlotte is good but not as good as some people say about her. The reason her flaws aren't shown is because she has people who allow her to hide them. In ring, she is good and understands match psychology. It isn't a fair assessment to say Charlotte is the greatest ever. Their have been female talent who is just as good. If not better. It is like saying Miesha Tate is one of the greatest. Some would say she beat Holly Holm who beat one of the greatest MMA fighters ever in Ronda Rousey. I swear, the people who write these articles should put more thought into their subject and do research. I don't know why Forbes is even talking about WWE these days. Their subscriber reach must be declining but I digress. Exactly. She has come a long way since her NXT days. I don't think anyone has mentioned this though. Charlotte debuted in 2013 at the age of 27! She started training in 2012 so she's only been around a short period. Honestly I do have to give her props. Seeing as how most start out right out of high school. Charlotte does inspire me since I started training at 21 (right now I'm out due to my back) but I still want to keep going. I'm 24 now so seeing Charlotte start out later, train hard and get to where she is now is mind blowing. I cannot right now say that she is the greatest. I don't believe there is any such thing as "the greatest wrestler of all time" since this sport is and will always be. However she is one of the best now, and 10 maybe 20 years from now she will be "one of the greatest." Charlotte, Bayley, Asuka, Sasha, Becky and Nikki are some of the best WWE has right now. As well as Naomi who is severely underrated. Like I said. I do not believe in any one person being "the greatest." Charlotte is no Moolah, Trish, Lita or Victoria. She'll get there. In all honesty, the biggest part in her success is her father.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Sept 29, 2016 23:11:22 GMT -5
Charlotte is exceptional, particularly when you consider her relative inexperience. Ric Flair got her in the door, but to use that as the reason that she is top of the tree is utter b0ll0x. It's nice to be nostalgic about Wendi, and Sherry etc etc. But they were absolutely SHYTE in the ring!!! The quality of the womens matches is now better than ever, hence it's not undfair to say she is the best ever already. Saying that, the match on Sunday was shyte. Lacklustre. Again, caused by not enough build and story telling, as well as making Bayley look weak as F. That 3-Way would have been SO MUCH better if Bayley didn't lose to a ing big boot.... Anything else would have bumped it up quite a few notches for me.
|
|
Hem-Ridge
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 18, 2011 13:27:06 GMT -5
Posts: 636
|
Post by Hem-Ridge on Sept 30, 2016 9:32:05 GMT -5
I wouldn't put her near the best currently, let alone of all time.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 30, 2016 9:50:32 GMT -5
No, she's not. People don't give Charlotte enough credit she's one of the best female wrestlers WWE has right now. And I'll go ahead and take a shot at Sasha Banks while I'm at it and say she's absolute garbage in the ring, if it weren't for Bailey she wouldn't have gotten this far. Sasha is right up there with Paige in terms of being too big headed. This 100% Bayley made Sasha. Umm, I'm pretty sure Sasha Banks was already Women's Champion for six months before the Bayley feud. She had already had star making performances with Charlotte and Becky Lynch. Crap on Sasha's main roster performances all you want, you can think she's garbage in the ring, you can even think she's the worst female in the company, but let's not try and lie about when she became a star. Sure the Bayley feud sent BOTH women into the next level, but come on.
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Sept 30, 2016 10:50:20 GMT -5
I think Charlotte has the potential to be the greatest diva of all time especially if she wins multiple Women's Championships but also puts on five star matches in whatever match she ends up being in
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Sept 30, 2016 11:49:23 GMT -5
She's certainly heading that way - she's the best active female currently, which should be evident to anyone with a clue. Also, to claim most of her success is down to her being Ric's daughter, is utter bollocks, quite frankly.
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Sept 30, 2016 20:08:17 GMT -5
I think she is abit, meh, on the mic...
|
|