|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Mar 13, 2017 21:16:45 GMT -5
No one and also I think he should've retired after WrestleMania 28 at 20-0 with the whole 'End of an Era' tagline.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Mar 13, 2017 22:15:47 GMT -5
Bray Wyatt
|
|
|
Post by Yayo on Mar 13, 2017 22:29:11 GMT -5
I loved the character that came out of Brock beating Taker. That should've been taker's last match though. He hasn't competed at an elite level since WM29, and these last few years have hurt his legacy imo
|
|
|
Post by FBtagteamsrule on Mar 14, 2017 0:32:35 GMT -5
Jimmy Snuka should have beat him at WrestleMania.
|
|
Papi Joker
Main Eventer
INTERNATIONAL COLLECTORS LIVES MATTER
Joined on: Feb 23, 2016 23:56:30 GMT -5
Posts: 1,527
|
Post by Papi Joker on Mar 14, 2017 1:16:59 GMT -5
Kane, than took over a new streak
|
|
|
Post by hbkjason on Mar 14, 2017 1:53:50 GMT -5
No one. They pissed it away for five minutes of shock value. Brock Lesnar looked no better for ending the streak.
|
|
Jimmy Toucan (+ The Flipout)
Superstar
'They should just give us album of the year...right now.'
Joined on: Aug 7, 2016 17:04:33 GMT -5
Posts: 727
|
Post by Jimmy Toucan (+ The Flipout) on Mar 14, 2017 4:54:51 GMT -5
I wish you had an 'other' option, where he loses to Vince. Way to make up for Surivior Series 2003 with a 'I created you, and I'll end you' type angle.
|
|
|
Post by The Constable on Mar 14, 2017 6:01:12 GMT -5
Randy Orton when he had the legend killer gimmick
|
|
|
Post by bengalsredsbucks20 on Mar 14, 2017 10:10:04 GMT -5
Orton would have made perfect sense at the time. On today's roster the only guy that would make any sense is Roman. Lesnar did not need it and now the opposite has happened to where he was supposed to be the mega heel the rest of his career instead he gets cheered. It was wasted imo.
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Mar 14, 2017 10:25:06 GMT -5
It should have never been broken
|
|
|
Post by The Champ is Here! on Mar 14, 2017 10:38:58 GMT -5
About of those choices? No one
CM Punk should have
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 14, 2017 10:43:45 GMT -5
Nobody, the Streak should have been left alone. I understand that it is a fictional tv show, but imagine the hype (especially now that he is old)the streak would have for a match against Reigns or Cena?
I just think it was a stupid decision, that they probably now regret.
|
|
killerkapowski
Superstar
Switched from Motorola to a PrimeCo phone...
Joined on: May 31, 2014 22:32:55 GMT -5
Posts: 713
|
Post by killerkapowski on Mar 14, 2017 11:30:37 GMT -5
I don't have a problem with the streak ending. Even though it's sports entertainment, I can't suspend much disbelief that a 50+ year old man can beat a much younger, stronger opponent in a combat sport...or any sport involving physical punishment. 'Big Match' John Cena should've broke the streak. In my eyes, he's THE gatekeeper of the current WWE product who can still deliver good matches.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 20:08:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 13:53:08 GMT -5
Should have never been broken. It got to a point to where nobody but a teeny tiny minority wanted him to lose, and the majority knew he was going to win but would explode at the finish anyway.
People came to see Taker win. Not lose.
|
|
|
Post by Gone. on Mar 14, 2017 13:55:48 GMT -5
Punk.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Mar 14, 2017 14:15:23 GMT -5
i'm completely okay with the way it ended. their handling of brock since has varied from good to bad, but overall i enjoyed it.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Mar 14, 2017 14:42:51 GMT -5
I would have preferred to see it stay in tact. When the announcers were saying "he's 22-1" after Wrestlemania 31, it didn't seem big at all.
That being said, Brock was the right person to end it. When the likes of Orton, Batista, Kane, Michaels, Punk and Triple H (after interference and multiple chair and sledgehammer shots) etc, have tried then who else can? A former UFC champion who could legit kick anyone's ass on the roster.
|
|
|
Post by kingnothing ~ Hardwired... on Mar 14, 2017 18:20:29 GMT -5
In an event where the outcomes are predetermined, having someone undefeated for the sake of having them undefeated until they retire is rather pointless. He's not overcoming odds and pulling off the win himself, after all. Common sense would say that the streak should have been used to give someone the rub to be elevated as a top guy that was on the brink of getting there.
The rumors I hear are that Taker made it abundantly clear that he was retiring after his match with Brock, so Vince pulled the trigger on ending the streak. Even if he would have left the ring after that, the loss was to someone that didn't need it.
In this day and age where merch sales decide your place on the roster, why even have a plot device such as a winning streak anyway? I suppose they would've run out of semi-top guys to job out to the Undertaker eventually.
|
|
|
Post by The King Of Crisps on Mar 14, 2017 21:49:43 GMT -5
I never cared who he would lose to its just the point that when it ended then he should have walked away.
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Mar 15, 2017 11:23:48 GMT -5
Out of the current roster there could have been so many guys who could have benefited such as:
AJ Styles Bray Wyatt Roman Reigns Seth Rollins Finn Balor
|
|