|
|
Post by Word™ on May 10, 2017 16:56:56 GMT -5
OP misspelt Bryan. So, take this however you chose. Under no circumstance could Finn Balor be considered a legitimate threat to Brock Lesnar, even with kayfabe.. That match would also be utter trash.. I honestly hope they pick someone that can do more than different versions of a double stomp. Do you believe Daniel Bryan could have had a good match with Brock? Daniel Bryan was always booked as the under dog winning against all odds.. Triple H, Randy Orton, Batista, Bray, etc.. He had been fighting guys twice his size before Brock was rumored. That and he could wrestle circles around almost any wrestler on the planet.. So yeah, I would have bought into Daniel Bryan v. Brock Lesnar. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 3:54:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 18:02:25 GMT -5
I'd love to see Brock smash the sht out of Finn
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on May 10, 2017 18:04:27 GMT -5
Where did all the question marks above Balor come from?
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 10, 2017 18:25:50 GMT -5
I'd love to see Brock smash the sht out of Finn Same here man, but you know damn well that they're gonna do some crazy crap and have Finn F-5 Brock like 5 times... |
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on May 10, 2017 18:42:50 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different?
|
|
|
|
Post by Manning Of Steel on May 10, 2017 18:50:27 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? Because Finn Balor never beat Triple H, Randy Orton, and Batista all in the same night. With that logic, Jericho should come back to face Brock seeings as he beat Rock and Austin in the same night. Book the match, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan. |
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on May 10, 2017 18:55:18 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? With that logic, Jericho should come back to face Brock seeings as he beat Rock and Austin in the same night. Book the match, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan. That was just luck.  |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on May 10, 2017 19:00:20 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? Nobody said Bryan was a threat? He'd be in an Eddie Guerrero situation and be a huge underdog. Finn never was and never can be built up like an underdog |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on May 10, 2017 22:25:01 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? Nobody said Bryan was a threat? He'd be in an Eddie Guerrero situation and be a huge underdog. Finn never was and never can be built up like an underdog I honestly don't know WHAT they're selling Finn Balor as. |
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on May 10, 2017 23:12:57 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? Nobody said Bryan was a threat? He'd be in an Eddie Guerrero situation and be a huge underdog. Finn never was and never can be built up like an underdog Did you ever watch his feud with Joe? Cause he was pretty much made out to be the underdog in that feud. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on May 11, 2017 1:51:17 GMT -5
Where has the negativity towards Finn Balor suddenly emerged from? If Daniel Bryan could supposedly be a legit threat to Brock then why would Balor be any different? Nobody said Bryan was a threat? He'd be in an Eddie Guerrero situation and be a huge underdog. Finn never was and never can be built up like an underdog i see absolutely no reason why balor couldn't be booked as an underdog. i also see no reason why balor wouldn't be a formidable threat to lesnar if built properly. but you can't build a house on sand (50/50 booking). |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on May 11, 2017 6:14:23 GMT -5
Nobody said Bryan was a threat? He'd be in an Eddie Guerrero situation and be a huge underdog. Finn never was and never can be built up like an underdog Did you ever watch his feud with Joe? Cause he was pretty much made out to be the underdog in that feud. Having an even feud with someone doesn't make you an underdog? So because Orton originally lost to Cena, he became an underdog in their next matches? I don't think people understand what that word means. It's someone who people doubt constantly and don't think can win these huge matches against all these people who are bigger than them, more successful then them, etc. Balor does not come across as someone people would doubt in most scenarios whatsoever. Bryan was a small somewhat scrappy looking guy who for awhile was not a heavily protected asset so he would lose a good amount of times and bring that doubt in peoples minds when it came to the big matches like "Oh is he gonna win".. Much like his MITB cash-in victory. The way they even executed that gave him more of the underdog character. |
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on May 11, 2017 8:08:19 GMT -5
Did you ever watch his feud with Joe? Cause he was pretty much made out to be the underdog in that feud. Having an even feud with someone doesn't make you an underdog? So because Orton originally lost to Cena, he became an underdog in their next matches? I don't think people understand what that word means. It's someone who people doubt constantly and don't think can win these huge matches against all these people who are bigger than them, more successful then them, etc. Balor does not come across as someone people would doubt in most scenarios whatsoever. Bryan was a small somewhat scrappy looking guy who for awhile was not a heavily protected asset so he would lose a good amount of times and bring that doubt in peoples minds when it came to the big matches like "Oh is he gonna win".. Much like his MITB cash-in victory. The way they even executed that gave him more of the underdog character. They always made it appear as though Finn barely escaped the matches with Joe. And then Joe was in full control of the feud from the time he won the title until Takeover The End.... So yeah I'd say that Finn was definitely the underdog in that feud.... |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on May 11, 2017 9:03:13 GMT -5
Having an even feud with someone doesn't make you an underdog? So because Orton originally lost to Cena, he became an underdog in their next matches? I don't think people understand what that word means. It's someone who people doubt constantly and don't think can win these huge matches against all these people who are bigger than them, more successful then them, etc. Balor does not come across as someone people would doubt in most scenarios whatsoever. Bryan was a small somewhat scrappy looking guy who for awhile was not a heavily protected asset so he would lose a good amount of times and bring that doubt in peoples minds when it came to the big matches like "Oh is he gonna win".. Much like his MITB cash-in victory. The way they even executed that gave him more of the underdog character. They always made it appear as though Finn barely escaped the matches with Joe. And then Joe was in full control of the feud from the time he won the title until Takeover The End.... So yeah I'd say that Finn was definitely the underdog in that feud.... Randy Orton barely beat Cena in his matches so I guess he's an underdog too! Might as well toss Cena up there as the underdog in his matches with Styles since AJ bested him each time before the Rumble. My favorite was how Undertaker was the underdog against the 24 year old Randy Orton in their HIAC match since Orton beat him two times prior thus making Undertaker the underdog in their final encounter, right?  |
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on May 11, 2017 10:08:27 GMT -5
They always made it appear as though Finn barely escaped the matches with Joe. And then Joe was in full control of the feud from the time he won the title until Takeover The End.... So yeah I'd say that Finn was definitely the underdog in that feud.... Randy Orton barely beat Cena in his matches so I guess he's an underdog too! Might as well toss Cena up there as the underdog in his matches with Styles since AJ bested him each time before the Rumble. My favorite was how Undertaker was the underdog against the 24 year old Randy Orton in their HIAC match since Orton beat him two times prior thus making Undertaker the underdog in their final encounter, right? It's not that Finn beat him....it was the fact that he just BARELY was able to do so and Joe dominated those matches. You're not understanding what I meant, maybe I should have worded things differently. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on May 11, 2017 10:41:57 GMT -5
Randy Orton barely beat Cena in his matches so I guess he's an underdog too! Might as well toss Cena up there as the underdog in his matches with Styles since AJ bested him each time before the Rumble. My favorite was how Undertaker was the underdog against the 24 year old Randy Orton in their HIAC match since Orton beat him two times prior thus making Undertaker the underdog in their final encounter, right? It's not that Finn beat him....it was the fact that he just BARELY was able to do so and Joe dominated those matches. You're not understanding what I meant, maybe I should have worded things differently. That was only one feud though |
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on May 11, 2017 11:46:55 GMT -5
It's not that Finn beat him....it was the fact that he just BARELY was able to do so and Joe dominated those matches. You're not understanding what I meant, maybe I should have worded things differently. That was only one feud though Well he hasn't exactly faced many other guys that he should have been portrayed as the underdog against. He was definitely the underdog when he faced Reigns. Other than that an argument could be made that he should have been booked more as an underdog against KO. Other than that he's been booked perfectly fine IMO. I see no issue with him facing Lesnar at some point. I'm not sure why so many do. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on May 11, 2017 13:34:30 GMT -5
That was only one feud though Well he hasn't exactly faced many other guys that he should have been portrayed as the underdog against. He was definitely the underdog when he faced Reigns. Other than that an argument could be made that he should have been booked more as an underdog against KO. Other than that he's been booked perfectly fine IMO. I see no iddie with him facing Lesnar at some point. I'm not sure why so many do. I have no issue, only when Daniel is brought into the convo and compared to Balor |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 3:54:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 22:04:31 GMT -5
Wwe swerves everyone and makes it kalisto
|
|
