|
Post by ahunter8056 on Jun 12, 2017 18:28:54 GMT -5
You can't blame booking on the lack of interest in the Horsewomen. You absolutely can. Poor booking will lead to a loss of interest if prolonged. Every single one of the Four Horsewomen have been booked poorly since WrestleMania. Bayley has been made to look incredibly weak in her feud with Alexa Bliss. Becky Lynch has been booked as a constant loser since losing her SmackDown Women's title in December. Sasha Banks didn't do anything from WrestleMania to mid-May, at which point she was thrown into 205 Live rather than competing anywhere near the RAW Women's Championship. Even before WrestleMania, Sasha Banks was mostly booked to lose, losing at Roadblock, Royal Rumble, and WrestleMania. She only got a victory at Fastlane.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jun 12, 2017 18:36:09 GMT -5
You can't blame booking on the lack of interest in the Horsewomen. You absolutely can. Poor booking will lead to a loss of interest if prolonged. Every single one of the Four Horsewomen have been booked poorly since WrestleMania. Bayley has been made to look incredibly weak in her feud with Alexa Bliss. Becky Lynch has been booked as a constant loser since losing her SmackDown Women's title in December. Sasha Banks didn't do anything from WrestleMania to mid-May, at which point she was thrown into 205 Live rather than competing anywhere near the RAW Women's Championship. Even before WrestleMania, Sasha Banks was mostly booked to lose, losing at Roadblock, Royal Rumble, and WrestleMania. She only got a victory at Fastlane. Maybe they should join Total Divas then. That helped keep all the women relevant when the women's division was lacking. I am sure that would be right up Sasha Banks ally, a spotlight on her at all times and being seen by a whole new bunch of viewers who are probably unfamiliar with her.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,275
|
Post by hbkowns on Jun 12, 2017 18:54:52 GMT -5
No she's wack.
She's lucky she's still being used on TV.
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Jun 12, 2017 19:02:54 GMT -5
She's a Diva. Divas are done. Pass. Lana and Naomi say hello
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Jun 12, 2017 19:09:58 GMT -5
You absolutely can. Poor booking will lead to a loss of interest if prolonged. Every single one of the Four Horsewomen have been booked poorly since WrestleMania. Bayley has been made to look incredibly weak in her feud with Alexa Bliss. Becky Lynch has been booked as a constant loser since losing her SmackDown Women's title in December. Sasha Banks didn't do anything from WrestleMania to mid-May, at which point she was thrown into 205 Live rather than competing anywhere near the RAW Women's Championship. Even before WrestleMania, Sasha Banks was mostly booked to lose, losing at Roadblock, Royal Rumble, and WrestleMania. She only got a victory at Fastlane. Maybe they should join Total Divas then. That helped keep all the women relevant when the women's division was lacking. I am sure that would be right up Sasha Banks ally, a spotlight on her at all times and being seen by a whole new bunch of viewers who are probably unfamiliar with her. That's not the answer though. The answer would be for creative to actually book their female divisions correctly. Wrestlers shouldn't have to turn to reality TV as an alternative to their actual career. That was only a serious alternative at a time when WWE wouldn't book their women for any substantial length of time. In the women's evolution era, that's a ridiculous suggestion. As for Sasha Banks, she's already stated in the past that appearing on Total Divas is not something she'd ever be interested in. I'm fairly certain the Total Divas viewership consists entirely of WWE fans, who watch WWE anyway, so would know exactly who she is if she ever did appear.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jun 12, 2017 19:28:57 GMT -5
Maybe they should join Total Divas then. That helped keep all the women relevant when the women's division was lacking. I am sure that would be right up Sasha Banks ally, a spotlight on her at all times and being seen by a whole new bunch of viewers who are probably unfamiliar with her. That's not the answer though. The answer would be for creative to actually book their female divisions correctly. Wrestlers shouldn't have to turn to reality TV as an alternative to their actual career. That was only a serious alternative at a time when WWE wouldn't book their women for any substantial length of time. In the women's evolution era, that's a ridiculous suggestion. As for Sasha Banks, she's already stated in the past that appearing on Total Divas is not something she'd ever be interested in. I'm fairly certain the Total Divas viewership consists entirely of WWE fans, who watch WWE anyway, so would know exactly who she is if she ever did appear. I guess tagging up with jobbers on 205 Live is the way to go then for Sasha's career. Plus not everyone at all times can win, so clearly Sasha, Charlotte, Bayley and them are gonna have to take a back seat to the likes of Carmella, Alexa and Dana. It's the way the wrestling business works.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 12:55:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2017 20:11:00 GMT -5
She's a Diva. Divas are done. Pass. Lana and Naomi say hello Are you insinuating those 2 are deserving of Championship reigns? I sure hope not.
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Jun 12, 2017 20:13:56 GMT -5
Are you insinuating those 2 are deserving of Championship reigns? I sure hope not. You said divas are done. I said they aren't.
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Jun 12, 2017 21:41:29 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 12:55:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2017 23:01:41 GMT -5
Honestly that Pizza Dar tried to bang deserves that belt more than Fox.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jun 12, 2017 23:17:12 GMT -5
She ranks with Tamina as the worst woman on the WWE roster. Her in-ring ability, acting and gimmick are all awful, so no.
|
|
shawnedge
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 23, 2012 15:36:46 GMT -5
Posts: 180
|
Post by shawnedge on Jun 13, 2017 3:12:11 GMT -5
Just my opinion, but I really like Fox, I like the way she sells and her offence and we can all agree she's definitely got the looks. I feel like the only time she was given a chance was in the Divas era. Which we all know consisted of three minute matches and poor storyline building.
In this new era, I would just like to see her in a one on one match with a decent amount of time and see what she can really do. And if she's bad then she's bad and everyone will see that. But it would be nice after all this time she's spent with the company if they at least give her the chance to have one memorable match before she inevitably leaves.
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Jun 13, 2017 3:56:20 GMT -5
That's not the answer though. The answer would be for creative to actually book their female divisions correctly. Wrestlers shouldn't have to turn to reality TV as an alternative to their actual career. That was only a serious alternative at a time when WWE wouldn't book their women for any substantial length of time. In the women's evolution era, that's a ridiculous suggestion. As for Sasha Banks, she's already stated in the past that appearing on Total Divas is not something she'd ever be interested in. I'm fairly certain the Total Divas viewership consists entirely of WWE fans, who watch WWE anyway, so would know exactly who she is if she ever did appear. I guess tagging up with jobbers on 205 Live is the way to go then for Sasha's career. Plus not everyone at all times can win, so clearly Sasha, Charlotte, Bayley and them are gonna have to take a back seat to the likes of Carmella, Alexa and Dana. It's the way the wrestling business works. Why would that be the way to go for Sasha's career? She's a bonafide star, who was a big part of changing people's perception of women's wrestling while in NXT, and someone who WWE relied on as a main part of the Women's Revolution. Going to 205 Live on a permanent basis would be a huge waste, and quite frankly is beneath her. Of course not everyone can win all the time due to the nature of pro wrestling, but there is a way to book them well, while still having them lose from time to time. What they're doing right now is definitely not it. For example, Bayley should have gotten the upper hand on Alexa Bliss during their feud in at least equal measure in the build-up. One solution to solve this problem would be to have at least two womens matches per PPV. One match for the title, and another to build momentum for other female superstars on the roster.
|
|
|
Post by blissfan4life on Jun 13, 2017 6:57:17 GMT -5
She ranks with Tamina as the worst woman on the WWE roster. Her in-ring ability, acting and gimmick are all awful, so no. This is a joke right? She's honestly pretty damn good in the ring.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 13, 2017 7:18:45 GMT -5
Your opinions back a couple years on that one dude. Bliss is gaining popularity while Bayley, Sasha, and Charlotte are losing fanfare due to their booking. Actually it was less than a year ago that the internet fans were saying that. Nobody really cared about Alexa or Carmella a year ago right now. Both were still in NXT, and once the Draft took place in July, they got their opportunity to shine on Smackdown. Mean while, Bayley was just coming up to Raw, and the whole internet world was talking about how Sasha, Charlotte and Bayley were gonna tear it up on Raw and that Becky deserves to be the first Smackdown Women's Champion. Well, almost a year later, we got Charlotte being sent to Smackdown to dwindle there, we have Sasha on 205 Live managing Rich Swann, and we have Bayley getting out smarted by Alexa, while Carmella looks to be the one to win the MITB this Sunday. You can't blame booking on the lack of interest in the Horsewomen. It's just that they really aren't as great as they were perceived to be in NXT. The same thing is happening with Nakamura right now too on Smackdown Live. You are correct. All everyone ever cared or talked about was the Horsewomen, it was as if they were the only good things going in women's wrestling.
Then the draft happened and out of nowhere Alexa emerged and she conquered the SD women's division within weeks. ATM we have Carmella, Alexa, Emma and Nia Jax who have proven to be just as good if not better and neither of them were ever overrated as much as the Horsewomen.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jun 13, 2017 8:43:23 GMT -5
She ranks with Tamina as the worst woman on the WWE roster. Her in-ring ability, acting and gimmick are all awful, so no. This is a joke right? She's honestly pretty damn good in the ring.
Not at all. I honestly believe she's terrible. I can't remember her having a single good match and her offense looks like trash. Well, except for her Northern lights suplex. She has an excellent one.
|
|
|
Post by TheSystem 1.5 on Jun 13, 2017 10:32:41 GMT -5
Actually it was less than a year ago that the internet fans were saying that. Nobody really cared about Alexa or Carmella a year ago right now. Both were still in NXT, and once the Draft took place in July, they got their opportunity to shine on Smackdown. Mean while, Bayley was just coming up to Raw, and the whole internet world was talking about how Sasha, Charlotte and Bayley were gonna tear it up on Raw and that Becky deserves to be the first Smackdown Women's Champion. Well, almost a year later, we got Charlotte being sent to Smackdown to dwindle there, we have Sasha on 205 Live managing Rich Swann, and we have Bayley getting out smarted by Alexa, while Carmella looks to be the one to win the MITB this Sunday. You can't blame booking on the lack of interest in the Horsewomen. It's just that they really aren't as great as they were perceived to be in NXT. The same thing is happening with Nakamura right now too on Smackdown Live. You are correct. All everyone ever cared or talked about was the Horsewomen, it was as if they were the only good things going in women's wrestling.
Then the draft happened and out of nowhere Alexa emerged and she conquered the SD women's division within weeks. ATM we have Carmella, Alexa, Emma and Nia Jax who have proven to be just as good if not better and neither of them were ever overrated as much as the Horsewomen.
Nia?!
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Jun 13, 2017 10:35:27 GMT -5
You are correct. All everyone ever cared or talked about was the Horsewomen, it was as if they were the only good things going in women's wrestling. Then the draft happened and out of nowhere Alexa emerged and she conquered the SD women's division within weeks. ATM we have Carmella, Alexa, Emma and Nia Jax who have proven to be just as good if not better and neither of them were ever overrated as much as the Horsewomen. Nia?! The moment an argument loses all credibility...
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 13, 2017 11:00:54 GMT -5
You are correct. All everyone ever cared or talked about was the Horsewomen, it was as if they were the only good things going in women's wrestling.
Then the draft happened and out of nowhere Alexa emerged and she conquered the SD women's division within weeks. ATM we have Carmella, Alexa, Emma and Nia Jax who have proven to be just as good if not better and neither of them were ever overrated as much as the Horsewomen.
Nia?! Nia's athletic and good in the ring, what's the issue with her?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 12:55:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 11:02:49 GMT -5
Oh my how the times have changed.
|
|