buddyboy101
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 26, 2004 12:34:57 GMT -5
Posts: 946
|
Post by buddyboy101 on Oct 21, 2018 15:09:58 GMT -5
That Austin face looks pretty rough...sloppy painting, esp the eyes and beard.
|
|
|
Post by Fighter Hayabusa on Oct 21, 2018 15:48:12 GMT -5
Thought about getting 2 Harley figures (if I ever find em) and putting the crown and robe on Duggan but there’s no way to have the robe worn like a cape like Duggan, is there?
|
|
|
Post by SteveHulk on Oct 22, 2018 13:20:15 GMT -5
That Austin face looks pretty rough...sloppy painting, esp the eyes and beard. ...at least he's not wearing eyeliner...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 13:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 16:31:26 GMT -5
LUCKY!!!!!!
I've been searching like crazy for both Austin and Jake with no luck. Great pickup though.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 8, 2018 9:50:10 GMT -5
Updated 11/08 with the E61 Styles.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 10, 2018 11:53:16 GMT -5
I picked up another of the Fan Central Balor today.
|
|
HandsomeHollywood
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 6, 2005 20:55:01 GMT -5
Posts: 4,977
Member is Online
|
Post by HandsomeHollywood on Nov 10, 2018 14:02:35 GMT -5
Is that the newer head on that Styles? Does it make a difference in terms of proportion compared to the tiny E56 one, would you say?
|
|
|
Post by POOR-ly Cuyler on Nov 10, 2018 14:28:31 GMT -5
Is that the newer head on that Styles? Does it make a difference in terms of proportion compared to the tiny E56 one, would you say? It’s the same head as e56, they just use the face printing tech on it now
|
|
HandsomeHollywood
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 6, 2005 20:55:01 GMT -5
Posts: 4,977
Member is Online
|
Post by HandsomeHollywood on Nov 10, 2018 15:28:03 GMT -5
Is that the newer head on that Styles? Does it make a difference in terms of proportion compared to the tiny E56 one, would you say? It’s the same head as e56, they just use the face printing tech on it now Laaaame
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 11, 2018 10:05:10 GMT -5
Is that the newer head on that Styles? Does it make a difference in terms of proportion compared to the tiny E56 one, would you say? It’s the same head just painted differently.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 14, 2018 20:13:01 GMT -5
Updated with today’s receivings.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 19, 2018 7:47:13 GMT -5
Updated with the B87 Miz and Styles.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Nov 22, 2018 10:53:02 GMT -5
check you PMs PJ LMFAO here...…….
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Dec 12, 2018 7:23:20 GMT -5
Updated 12/12 with the Sting vs Undertaker Fan Central Battle Pack.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 13:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2018 7:44:39 GMT -5
Is that new True FX face paint on the Undertaker in the 2 pack?
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Dec 12, 2018 7:54:16 GMT -5
Is that new True FX face paint on the Undertaker in the 2 pack? No. It’s just like the EG/ WrestleMania Elite fgures
|
|
buddyboy101
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 26, 2004 12:34:57 GMT -5
Posts: 946
|
Post by buddyboy101 on Dec 12, 2018 9:03:52 GMT -5
Is that new True FX face paint on the Undertaker in the 2 pack? No. It’s just like the EG/ WrestleMania Elite fgures I agree it's not True FX, as this set was produced probably a year ago, but never made it to retail until now (prob due to TRU closure). However, the EG and WM Heritage scans are different. This Battle Pack scan appears to be the WM Heritage scan. Here's a good comparison of the WM/EG scans. WM is on the left; EG on the right. EDIT: This article/review also claims the EG and WM scans are the same but the paint apps are different. I'm having difficulty seeing this - mainly due to the eyes. The EG one is so bug-eyed, and really nails the Undertaker's likeness in the following picture. The WM scan looks kinda generic to me. The eyes are totally different in my opinion, but maybe not. Hard to say at least for me.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Dec 12, 2018 9:14:44 GMT -5
No. It’s just like the EG/ WrestleMania Elite fgures I agree it's not True FX, as this set was produced probably a year ago, but never made it to retail until now (prob due to TRU closure). However, the EG and WM Heritage scans are different. This Battle Pack scan appears to be the WM Heritage scan. Here's a good comparison of the two. WM is on the left; EG on the right. Yes I have both I just meant painted the same old way as those.
|
|
buddyboy101
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 26, 2004 12:34:57 GMT -5
Posts: 946
|
Post by buddyboy101 on Dec 12, 2018 9:18:55 GMT -5
I agree it's not True FX, as this set was produced probably a year ago, but never made it to retail until now (prob due to TRU closure). However, the EG and WM Heritage scans are different. This Battle Pack scan appears to be the WM Heritage scan. Here's a good comparison of the two. WM is on the left; EG on the right. Yes I have both I just meant painted the same old way as those. Gotcha. Check out my edit though - it sounds like the could indeed be the same scan just with very different paint jobs. Strange if true!
|
|
HandsomeHollywood
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 6, 2005 20:55:01 GMT -5
Posts: 4,977
Member is Online
|
Post by HandsomeHollywood on Dec 12, 2018 9:20:21 GMT -5
I'd love to see photos of PJ's entire collection sometime... Just sayin'.
|
|