Controversial endings

However Triple Threat match states that first pin wins the championship, so does that mean that the two challengers who pinned the champion in the triple threat are now named the Champion?

I looked at that mtatch and y2j pinned chyna and won it was clear cut, however requards to chyna and y2j being co champions of i.c. title. That happen because y2j did a back drop on chyna and he bridged it at first then his strength gave out because he himself landed on a steel chair when he did the back drop on chyna. there were two refs in that situation too and one ref said chynas shoulders were down so y2j won, and the other ref saw y2js shoulders down on the mat so he declared chyna won. making them co champions. I don't know what management did about the results.. I think they had them fight at the next ppv. not sure.



If I were the authority type I wouldn't know what to do, except see the match as a draw having the champion being the champion. The match being faulted always gives the champion the advantage so I would say.... the champion remains champion and the challengers pick up the win however they don't get the championship due to the two challengers pinning at the same time resulting in a draw where the champion even though pinned would retain. what do you think?

But you were right in the idea restarting the match, its a decision someone above the ref would make.


at summerslam where big sho vs cm punk vs cena for wwe title ... cena and punk made show submit at the same time. And AJ LEE general manager at the time decided to restart the match.

Break down 98 stone cold was pinned by both taker and kane. Vince made taker vs kane for title at next ppv

It's all part of the script so it's the bookers decision.

I watched the 2016 No Mercy PPV last night, and noticed this when John Cena and Dean Ambrose made AJ Styles tap out and the ref just continued the match until there was a clear winner.