|
Post by Kliquid on May 13, 2008 12:20:32 GMT -5
Matt Walsh = douchebag
|
|
|
Post by cmm on May 13, 2008 14:21:44 GMT -5
I don't know why senators are getting into the NFL discussion.. they head should be up someone's ass trying to get re-elected not having anything to do with football
|
|
|
Post by nyk9327 on May 13, 2008 17:09:45 GMT -5
Yea hopefully this crap doesn't flare up again when the Pats are 4-0 and somebody else wants to talk about the truth..... 13 months later.
I could care less, the Giants got one over on them and it's fairly obvious there is something messed up going on in NE. Fans and people who matter will never agree on it, but it's obviously there. Just let them play. The Pats struggled with teams that played smashmouth (signs don't matter as much) like the Eagles and Giants. Maybe teams will take a different approach.
It just sucks for both sides that everytime the Pats go on a tear SOME people are going to question it.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on May 13, 2008 19:01:01 GMT -5
No, i'll side with Ralpho and the other guy on this one. you have no argument, so you use a petty excuse,and for the love of god remove one of your sigs. I dont care if you side with the Devil himself. You follow me around from board to board making useless and random comments in order to draw anger or irrational behavior by me. And yet....you fail......everytime. Would you like me to remove a sig? If so......I'll just add another one. Cuz I can tell how it both controls and destroys your life. God forbid that you, of all people, are inconvenienced.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on May 14, 2008 11:13:04 GMT -5
Holy crap. Specter is tearing them to shreds!
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on May 14, 2008 11:14:51 GMT -5
Holy crap. Specter is tearing them to shreds! And what exactly is "tearing them to shreds" going to do? Absolutely nothing, while all his fellow Senators and other lawmakers are giggling at him behind his back
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on May 14, 2008 11:18:09 GMT -5
Well its not that he wants to go after the Pats themselves, but he is really going after Goodell* and all the rest of the ****s that purjered themselves.
When A Senator calls for an Impartial Investigation, thats when you know someone is with-holding something...
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on May 14, 2008 11:23:44 GMT -5
Well its not that he wants to go after the Pats themselves, but he is really going after Goodell* and all the rest of the ****s that purjered themselves. When A Senator calls for an Impartial Investigation, thats when you know someone is with-holding something... Goddell has actually been one of the tougher commissioners, but Specter is an ass, and looks stupid, because nothing he says will ever get done. This isnt Congress talking about steroids, that ran rampant throughout the entire sport....this is one jerkoff Senator trying to be a tough guy and break up a team that only 1 team has taken down. I bet hes a Steelers season ticket holder
|
|
|
Post by T R W on May 14, 2008 11:26:14 GMT -5
He really ought to let this go.
|
|
|
Post by sonstuds on May 14, 2008 11:29:59 GMT -5
Arlen Specter's a goof. Let go of something that doesn't even directly affect you.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on May 14, 2008 12:10:47 GMT -5
The thing is, it's not illegal. It has nothing to do with the law, so let the NFL handle their business. With baseball, at least they were looking into illegal drugs. There is no excuse for him to be involved with this. They Pats were caught, and punished. Let it go.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on May 14, 2008 15:27:22 GMT -5
Well its not that he wants to go after the Pats themselves, but he is really going after Goodell* and all the rest of the ****s that purjered themselves. When A Senator calls for an Impartial Investigation, thats when you know someone is with-holding something... Goddell has actually been one of the tougher commissioners, but Specter is an ass, and looks stupid, because nothing he says will ever get done. This isnt Congress talking about steroids, that ran rampant throughout the entire sport....this is one jerkoff Senator trying to be a tough guy and break up a team that only 1 team has taken down. I bet hes a Steelers season ticket holder I think Specter is a major Eagles fan. Being from PA, I thought I heard him say something to that accord before.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on May 14, 2008 15:53:56 GMT -5
The thing is, it's not illegal. It has nothing to do with the law, so let the NFL handle their business. With baseball, at least they were looking into illegal drugs. There is no excuse for him to be involved with this. They Pats were caught, and punished. Let it go. EXACTLY. I don't even understand what the hell he has to do with the situation at all.
|
|
|
Post by cmm on May 14, 2008 16:05:15 GMT -5
The thing is, it's not illegal. It has nothing to do with the law, so let the NFL handle their business. With baseball, at least they were looking into illegal drugs. There is no excuse for him to be involved with this. They Pats were caught, and punished. Let it go. EXACTLY. I don't even understand what the hell he has to do with the situation at all. im still confused why the government is getting into the NFL's business.. let alone this walsh douchebag needing to go hide under a rock
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on May 14, 2008 16:14:25 GMT -5
EXACTLY. I don't even understand what the hell he has to do with the situation at all. im still confused why the government is getting into the NFL's business.. let alone this walsh douchebag needing to go hide under a rock I think its less the govt. and more Specter on a witch hunt.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on May 14, 2008 16:27:19 GMT -5
I also swear the word 'purjury' came outta Arlen's mouth as well, which would give him legit reason to investigate.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on May 14, 2008 16:33:34 GMT -5
I also swear the word 'purjury' came outta Arlen's mouth as well, which would give him legit reason to investigate. I was unaware that anything had been said under oath at all.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on May 14, 2008 16:39:46 GMT -5
I also swear the word 'purjury' came outta Arlen's mouth as well, which would give him legit reason to investigate. I was unaware that anything had been said under oath at all. I would assume Walsh's 'talk' with him yesterday was under oath.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on May 14, 2008 20:05:03 GMT -5
I was unaware that anything had been said under oath at all. I would assume Walsh's 'talk' with him yesterday was under oath. I wouldnt think so.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on May 14, 2008 21:09:17 GMT -5
I was unaware that anything had been said under oath at all. I would assume Walsh's 'talk' with him yesterday was under oath. One-on-one conversations are not under oath.
|
|