|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on May 23, 2019 18:32:15 GMT -5
They're more worried about complaining online about camera angles for 3 hours than actually watching the show. ahem. the camera work in the WWE absolutely sucks. its a 100% valid complaint. its a major part of the problem with the product. does it stop me from watching? no. but its something that annoys the living hell out of me to no end, so im going to complain about it until they wake the up, realize its a terrible way to present a TV show, and fix it. ....i'll just see myself out now I used to think you was overreacting about the whole camera work thing until I almost felt physically sick and nauseous by it during a beat down (Drew was involved) on RAW before, it actually is really bad lol
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 23, 2019 20:39:28 GMT -5
ahem. the camera work in the WWE absolutely sucks. its a 100% valid complaint. its a major part of the problem with the product. does it stop me from watching? no. but its something that annoys the living hell out of me to no end, so im going to complain about it until they wake the up, realize its a terrible way to present a TV show, and fix it. ....i'll just see myself out now I used to think you was overreacting about the whole camera work thing until I almost felt physically sick and nauseous by it during a beat down (Drew was involved) on RAW before, it actually is really bad lol this video from the 3:10 mark then watch this from about the 4:50 mark i mean i dont even HAVE to explain, but you watch these two things and it really points out how disgustingly terrible the camera work is nowadays. the cuts don't bother me....they've always done a ton of cuts (although the first video with the shield is absolutely ridiculous, cutting every 2 seconds), its the CONSTANT moving and shaking and moving and cutting and moving and shaking and yet you look at something from 13 years ago, that was just as crazy and "chaotic"....you actually SEE the action, nothing looks fake or missed. i just really miss being able to watch the action without a million zooms and shakes to try and "hide" something that doesnt even exist
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on May 23, 2019 20:44:03 GMT -5
I used to think you was overreacting about the whole camera work thing until I almost felt physically sick and nauseous by it during a beat down (Drew was involved) on RAW before, it actually is really bad lol this video from the 3:10 mark then watch this from about the 4:50 mark i mean i dont even HAVE to explain, but you watch these two things and it really points out how disgustingly terrible the camera work is nowadays. the cuts don't bother me....they've always done a ton of cuts, its the CONSTANT moving and shaking and moving and cutting and moving and shaking and yet you look at something from 13 years ago, that was just as crazy and "chaotic"....you actually SEE the action, nothing looks fake or missed. i just really miss being able to watch the action without a million zooms and shakes to try and "hide" something that doesnt even exist It’s 2:43am here in the UK and I don’t voluntarily want to make myself feel sick thanks lol. God, I remember how amazing that original SmackDown vs. RAW storyline was in 2005, I was 12 at the time and loved every minute of it. But I 100% believe the point you’re making.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 24, 2019 10:59:57 GMT -5
Who locked this? Why?
I don't see any issues, so I'm gonna unlock it.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 24, 2019 14:26:16 GMT -5
Who locked this? Why? I don't see any issues, so I'm gonna unlock it. it was a conspiracy to stop my camera work bitching....
|
|
Thunder Chunky
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 1, 2010 21:57:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,488
|
Post by Thunder Chunky on May 24, 2019 16:46:53 GMT -5
Jesus Big Show used to be so fat.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on May 24, 2019 19:01:59 GMT -5
I honestly don’t really ever pay attention to it unless it’s crazy bad like example above
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on May 31, 2019 12:05:04 GMT -5
WWE just doesn't make sense most of the time, and it's pretty insulting to the intelligence of the fans. WWE currently lacks creativity and the contradictions and historical liberties that they take is astounding sometimes. It's almost like they don't even want us to be fans because they constantly try and present a narrative or re-write history, which as a fan to tell me something was one way when it clearly wasn't...again, it's insulting.
Even something like what happened this week. WWE.com just posted this STUPID video of Stephanie McMahon saying how Brock Lesnar DISRESPECTED the WWE, the fans, the MITB legacy by turning it into a boom box and dancing around on RAW and refusing to say who he was cashing in on like he said he would. and WWE is GOING TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST BROCK AND PAUL!!!!!!!!!!
Well....let me ask you a question, Stephanie: How does it make sense that you say Brock's boom box was insulting and a disgrace to the WWE, the fans, and MITB.....BUT WWE's social media and the very same web site that your idiotic video is currently posted on is doing ads to tell me to MAKE SURE YOU HEAD OVER TO WWESHOP.COM AND PICK UP YOUR VERY OWN BROCK PARTY T-SHIRT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That would be like the New York Yankees selling YANKEES SUCK t-shirts....you're disproving your own supposed point of view.
And about the other thing, Lesnar is only just about almost every other guy who's EVER had MITB besides guys who cashed in the same night or announced it ahead of time (Cena, RVD, Ambrose, Kane...nobody else is coming to the top of my head right now) who at some point or MULTIPLE TIMES didn't act like they were going to cash in and then have second thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by Valbroski on May 31, 2019 15:06:36 GMT -5
They're more worried about complaining online about camera angles for 3 hours than actually watching the show. ahem. the camera work in the WWE absolutely sucks. its a 100% valid complaint. its a major part of the problem with the product. does it stop me from watching? no. but its something that annoys the living hell out of me to no end, so im going to complain about it until they wake the up, realize its a terrible way to present a TV show, and fix it. ....i'll just see myself out now Remember when AJ styles debuted and the camera zoomed in on Roman Reigns face for 5 minutes? Lol
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 31, 2019 22:07:14 GMT -5
WWE just doesn't make sense most of the time, and it's pretty insulting to the intelligence of the fans. WWE currently lacks creativity and the contradictions and historical liberties that they take is astounding sometimes. It's almost like they don't even want us to be fans because they constantly try and present a narrative or re-write history, which as a fan to tell me something was one way when it clearly wasn't...again, it's insulting. Even something like what happened this week. WWE.com just posted this STUPID video of Stephanie McMahon saying how Brock Lesnar DISRESPECTED the WWE, the fans, the MITB legacy by turning it into a boom box and dancing around on RAW and refusing to say who he was cashing in on like he said he would. and WWE is GOING TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST BROCK AND PAUL!!!!!!!!!! Well....let me ask you a question, Stephanie: How does it make sense that you say Brock's boom box was insulting and a disgrace to the WWE, the fans, and MITB.....BUT WWE's social media and the very same web site that your idiotic video is currently posted on is doing ads to tell me to MAKE SURE YOU HEAD OVER TO WWESHOP.COM AND PICK UP YOUR VERY OWN BROCK PARTY T-SHIRT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That would be like the New York Yankees selling YANKEES SUCK t-shirts....you're disproving your own supposed point of view. And about the other thing, Lesnar is only just about almost every other guy who's EVER had MITB besides guys who cashed in the same night or announced it ahead of time (Cena, RVD, Ambrose, Kane...nobody else is coming to the top of my head right now) who at some point or MULTIPLE TIMES didn't act like they were going to cash in and then have second thoughts. this is the problem....they treat the TV shows like they are separate from the online stuff, the social media and even the other shows. except when they dont, and they feel like saying "this was on WWE.com earlier"....instead of just having a backstage promo being cut by anyone who isn't talking to a vanilla robot news reporter who does the backstage "interviews" now its like they act as if everything that happens on TV only happens then, and everyone watching has never seen a WWE show before in their life. and they act that way EVERY. SINGLE. WEEK. it'd be like if you were watching Game of Thrones and every episode they had Jon Snow in a scene, and the camera cuts to some other guy who says "hey, thats Jon Snow!" and then 5 minutes later before something happens, they flash you back to last week when something else happened that was related to it. it makes sense on some level to do recaps, and inform the audience of what's going on. but they do it ALL THE TIME, every week and every show. its unbelievable how out of touch this company is with the way people consume their TV product. and yet they have no problem telling the audience how great they are on social media ::eye rolls::
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Jun 1, 2019 10:52:13 GMT -5
The company gets most viewers from the 18-49 demographic but its angled at children and families.
At this point Vince is like a kid playing sims with rosebud cheat on money isn't an issue lets make these puppets dance with no direction
|
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Jun 4, 2019 21:02:52 GMT -5
I think when the XFL comes back Vince will step away from WWE for a while. They could have HHH and Vince go at it leading into next years WM. HHH vs an opponent of Vince's choosing for control of the company, leading to Vince's departure. Or... better yet... they could have Vince "committed" and taken away screaming from the ring in a straight jacket with HHH, Steph and Shane in the ring smiling and waving goodbye.
|
|
Papi Joker
Main Eventer
INTERNATIONAL COLLECTORS LIVES MATTER
Joined on: Feb 23, 2016 23:56:30 GMT -5
Posts: 1,520
|
Post by Papi Joker on Jun 4, 2019 22:22:23 GMT -5
Entitled, whiny and insufferable fans are the problem. Not Vince. Ex-WWE staff, Ex-WWE wrestlers, reporters, current WWE staff: "Vince is the problem.."
|
|
|
Post by Halloween King on Jun 12, 2019 14:52:43 GMT -5
It's his company.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 12, 2019 17:04:59 GMT -5
Entitled, whiny and insufferable fans are the problem. Not Vince. Ex-WWE staff, Ex-WWE wrestlers, reporters, current WWE staff: "Vince is the problem.." Of course they do. Ex employees always blame the boss as do current employees. It’s always the bosses fault and never their own. And “wrestling reporters” always speculate at best. They never “quote” a reliable source. It’s almost always anonymous which I take with a grain of salt. If someone has something to say they need to own it. Until someone does it’s not credible. And even if he was/is it’s his company and as long as he’s not doing anything illegal he can run as he sees fit.
|
|
|
Post by theicwguy on Jun 12, 2019 17:39:20 GMT -5
Vince to AEW confirmed!!!
|
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Jun 12, 2019 19:44:36 GMT -5
wait a second... Technically isn't WWE a public company now? doesn't that mean the board of directors get voted in by the shareholders?
|
|
|
Post by figurecollector on Jun 12, 2019 19:53:58 GMT -5
wait a second... Technically isn't WWE a public company now? doesn't that mean the board of directors get voted in by the shareholders? Shareholders get a vote, but normally companies put out a list of "recommended" candidates. The McMahon family and their cohorts hold the majority votes one would assume and it would take an orchestrated effort to elect someone other than one of the candidates, if it is even possible to do so.
|
|
|
Post by FLUX '97 on Jun 13, 2019 5:15:56 GMT -5
Entitled, whiny and insufferable fans are the problem. Not Vince. Ex-WWE staff, Ex-WWE wrestlers, reporters, current WWE staff: "Vince is the problem.." Notice that all of these people are usually scorned ex-employees (ex. Cody, Moxley), journalists who are shilling the competitor because they want to be in with them (ex. Dave Meltzer, Cageside Seats), or people who are whining that they're not getting what they want (ex. Harper, Sasha) Pretty common thread here: They're all either bitter or petty.
|
|