wheeljack83
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2018 23:52:48 GMT -5
Posts: 1,353
|
Post by wheeljack83 on Jun 20, 2019 20:03:01 GMT -5
How many times are we going to have this thread? Fox demanded that the brand split stays, and if Fox is going to give you a billion dollars, you're going to listen to their demands. Just let it go. Fake news. I've seen no evidence to support this. In fact, I've read reports that say the exact opposite, that USA and FOX want it over, and Vince McMahon is the one demanding it to stay. |
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Jun 21, 2019 17:34:29 GMT -5
Why do people want the brand split dead? You do realize that ending brand split would showcase much less talent. That’s why the wildcard rule sucks because so many people that would get to have matches on tv don’t anymore because we need to see Roman, Mclyntre, Elias, Sami, KO on both shows for some reason. I’m convinced that Vince only made the wildcard rule with Roman in mind then he realized he could do it with everyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 21, 2019 18:41:27 GMT -5
Why do people want the brand split dead? You do realize that ending brand split would showcase much less talent. That’s why the wildcard rule sucks because so many people that would get to have matches on tv don’t anymore because we need to see Roman, Mclyntre, Elias, Sami, KO on both shows for some reason. I’m convinced that Vince only made the wildcard rule with Roman in mind then he realized he could do it with everyone. With the right booking the WWE could easily manage 1 huge roster. Look at the 24/7 title as an example so many lower carders are currently getting screen time, even if it's only for 1 minute. Also both networks want huge names so the only way that can happen is if the big names work both shows. |
|
