No more women's titles in the WWE......

It's really not all that confusing.

Let's be rational guys, when a male wrestler announces they are going after a championship, it's not against the female that is holding that equivalent championship. So no need for us to be cute about it.

To me this is an issue about equality vs. equity.

Equitable treatment is giving the women their world titles and tag titles, maybe even some day a secondary title. While the attempt to drop "Women's" from their titles is about making things equal for right or wrong reasons.

I also think it's a calculated business decision:

WWE has been boorishly proud of being the "first" with this women's revolution, first women's elimination chamber, first womeone's royal rumble, first women's hell in a cell etc. What they can't do is what IMPACT did (for a ratings grab) and that's have a woman beat a man for a WORLD title. Why? Because WWE is a global brand and you're not going to see true intergender matches in their ring. Chyna did it in the attitude era, but that was then, this is now, and probably forever.

So the next best thing is to be the "first" to eliminate the gender description. So Rhea, Becky and Bayley are "world" champions just like Tessa.

Meh. Not bad.

This might be the most level headed, well explained interpretation of what’s happening I’ve read in the last few days. Well done.

If this is important to the women then so be it. It's an odd take, and I don't personally think it does anything but to each their own. I just think WWE is so far behind on actually being progressive with women in wrestling. Like Candace LeRae broke a ton of barriers imo during her time tagging with Joey Ryan. Tessa Blanchard is kicking down walls for women. Nyla Rose isn't my cup of tea as a performer, but she's obviously breaking a big mold, too. Nothing WWE has done has really made me go, "oh, look how they're changing the business," outside of letting the women main event Mania. That's more of a big win over Vince McMahon, though. Triple H has never had a problem putting the women in the main event and he's always treated them like athletes since taking over NXT.

UFC already does this from a marketing standpoint. Go look at their posters. It doesn't say Women's Flyweight Championship. It says "World Flyweight Championship." So I'm assuming this is all in order to bring the women's titles to the same marketing level as the men without the female designation. Again, not something I think matters, but if it matters to the women then so be it. Baby steps are better than no steps. While I don't think this is proper use of forward thinking for women in wrestling, it's at least something they've thought about.

Clearly Brock needs to win the Rumble, challenge one of the women....absolutely destroy her and then pick up a mic and say "Suplex City doesnt see gender, bitch" and walk out. It will be greatest Mania moment ever.

Saudi Arabia.

If they go this route, they may as well retire the Women's belts and have them wrestle for the WWE and Universal titles. I'm sure Becky would change her mind if she had to put Brock over 1000 times.

Thank someone else on here has some common sense about this, rather than just bitching and whining about "PC culture" or "wokeness" or "snowflakes" or whatever the .