Mclovin
Superstar
This Forum's Resident Future WWE Champion, Not Changing This Until It Happens.
Joined on: Nov 12, 2018 4:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 826
|
Post by Mclovin on May 29, 2020 0:56:11 GMT -5
We all know what a smark is in today's terms. Someone who perfers smaller and/or athletic wrestlers, doesn't care about stories, loves anything but WWE, and constantly complain that their favorite wrestler doesn't get a push. Now an anti-smark is the exact opposite. They constantly trash wrestlers who are under 6'3" or do too many moves, they don't care about actual in-ring talent, they hate everything except WWE, and the constantly complain when a wrestler they don't like is on television. Here's where you start to see differences. Anti-smarks are generally stuck in the Attitude Era, fixated on tv ratings (which are outdated in the internet age), and they think they are superior to smarks. So which group is worse? Personally if I had to choose, I'd say the anti-smarks are worse. They are far more negative and think they are above everyone else. But in reality smarks and anti-smarks are the wrestling equivalent to democrats and republicans, both equally terrible. Sorry for the rant but the Instagram wrestling community has been driving me insane and I needed to vent here, which terrible group do you think is the most terrible?
|
|
|
Post by k5 on May 29, 2020 1:41:28 GMT -5
I don’t think either is worse than the other if they are respectful to one another about their opinion’s differences.
|
|
Mclovin
Superstar
This Forum's Resident Future WWE Champion, Not Changing This Until It Happens.
Joined on: Nov 12, 2018 4:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 826
|
Post by Mclovin on May 29, 2020 1:59:16 GMT -5
I don’t think either is worse than the other if they are respectful to one another about their opinion’s differences. They usually aren't XD
|
|
|
Post by rkfastmo on May 29, 2020 2:04:58 GMT -5
They both suck in equal amounts.
|
|
Mclovin
Superstar
This Forum's Resident Future WWE Champion, Not Changing This Until It Happens.
Joined on: Nov 12, 2018 4:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 826
|
Post by Mclovin on May 29, 2020 2:12:20 GMT -5
They both suck in equal amounts. I think anti-smarks are a little bit worse, like I know Adam Cole has small arms but he's still great.
|
|
|
Post by bWo on May 29, 2020 6:11:19 GMT -5
People online who call other people "smarks" are worse than both.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on May 29, 2020 10:49:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrmonkeyofficial on May 29, 2020 11:25:04 GMT -5
Anti-Smarks are smarks, they complain about smarks complaining about big guys, when anti-smarks do the same exact thing except with smaller guys, both complain about literally everything, there's no difference, how about let's all just be nice to each other?
|
|
|
Post by Jack Specific on May 29, 2020 12:57:26 GMT -5
Nope.
|
|