|
Post by TKO Propagandist on Sept 1, 2021 6:55:26 GMT -5
It's too late to go back now. The women have earned theirs, they have to have one. I would like to see a Rumble booked like 1999 or 2002s editions, where competitors in the match brawled across the building. Some lower card guys can eliminate themselves so there is no one in the ring while this happens. Or just have one guy in there stalling till the next person comes out.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah on Sept 1, 2021 9:50:46 GMT -5
They may have to limit it to 20 this year not alot of girls left.
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Sept 1, 2021 10:38:34 GMT -5
I'd be up for a year on, year off type deal with the Royal Rumble at this point. Like, one year a men's match and one year a woman's match. Yearly WWE events are majorly diluted and don't really have the impact they once did at all so yeah we'd have to wait longer but at least it would mean something again.
|
|
|
Post by hitmancmedge on Sept 1, 2021 10:48:36 GMT -5
They may have to limit it to 20 this year not alot of girls left. 1. Charlotte 2. Eva Marie 3. doudrop 4. Alexa Bliss 5. Nia Jax 6. Shayna Bazler 7. Asuka 8. Nikki ASH 9. Rhea Ripley 10. Zelina Vega 11. Carmella 12. Bianca Bel Air 13. Becky Lynch 14. Toni Storm 15. Nattie 16. Tamina 17. Sasha Banks 18. Liv Morgan 19. Naomi 20. Shotzi 21. Tegan Nox Plus legends and nxt they will be alright.
|
|
kinnikuman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 6, 2020 21:42:25 GMT -5
Posts: 4,660
|
Post by kinnikuman on Sept 1, 2021 12:56:49 GMT -5
And no women's Rumble match? How would the fans react? Half would be perfectly fine with it, and half would moan that it's sexist.
|
|
kinnikuman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 6, 2020 21:42:25 GMT -5
Posts: 4,660
|
Post by kinnikuman on Sept 1, 2021 12:58:55 GMT -5
Idea: cut all the men. Save on budget. Profit. How would that be a bad idea? Just asking questions. Honestly if Triple H took over and just made the entire WWE all the best women in the world, I’d be a big fan. Stardom is over there --->
|
|
|
Post by hitmancmedge on Sept 1, 2021 13:27:20 GMT -5
And no women's Rumble match? How would the fans react? Half would be perfectly fine with it, and half would moan that it's sexist. There is a middle ground? I have thought the women’s rumble for the most part have been good. The one where Charlotte won was alright but otherwise they have been good.
|
|
|
Post by Fighter Hayabusa on Sept 1, 2021 13:59:35 GMT -5
I say do a 15-20 women rumble. Over half the participants are legends or NXT talent that have zero chance of winning. Limit it to only main roster females with a couple slots for developmental and legend surprise entrants.
|
|
The Real Chillary
Main Eventer
Chillary since day one ish
Joined on: Aug 23, 2016 15:32:38 GMT -5
Posts: 1,181
|
Post by The Real Chillary on Sept 1, 2021 16:40:30 GMT -5
They're still finding their footing. They're getting better with every new women's Rumble, but it's hard when you have such a lack of different character types and spots to pick from in regards to legends.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Sept 2, 2021 7:21:10 GMT -5
I’m fine with the women having their own Elimination Chambers, TLCs, Money In The Bank etc matches. The Rumble is a slightly different story though due to the length. One sixty minute Rumble can be a bit of a marathon to make it through, let alone two of them. At this point though, you can’t really take it away without causing some uproar.
|
|