|
Post by Scott! on Dec 14, 2022 16:28:47 GMT -5
WWE has to be the most hypocritical company in the world. I get that times have changed, but honest to god that's a ridiculous decision.
|
|
|
Post by Codyverse: Tag Team Champion on Dec 14, 2022 16:30:29 GMT -5
I just read something about her content breached parameters with the Mattel deal and they said something to her about it and she had no intention of stopping due to the money she was making.
I have no idea if it’s legit or not.
|
|
jabronimark
Jobber
Joined on: Nov 4, 2022 6:07:22 GMT -5
Posts: 20
|
Post by jabronimark on Dec 14, 2022 16:50:26 GMT -5
I was shocked they let her post that sort of content for a long as they did. I'm surprised she opted to go with the fan site over the WWE career. I would imagine the subs will dry up without TV exposure.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Dec 14, 2022 16:55:19 GMT -5
Mattel had a problem with the photos
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Dec 14, 2022 16:59:32 GMT -5
Mattel had a problem with the photos So this all Bill and Steve’s fault? Gotcha. 😉 Also, remember guys… this is a “family friendly” forum. Just be careful of what we say/discuss.
|
|
|
Post by mrhoss on Dec 14, 2022 17:02:32 GMT -5
I've done a little research on this subject and Mandy's current photos and gifs were definitely pushing beyond the old Playboy photos. I'm guessing she wanted out. I wouldn't have released her, but I'm also not running a publicly traded company.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Dec 14, 2022 17:05:01 GMT -5
1099 contractor my a**. Ridiculous considering the history of this company. If she was making money on the side behind a paywall so what…she’s not doing porn.
AEW would be dumb to not atleast reach out. She has improved as a performer 10-fold from her time in NXT and can potentially help bring in new viewers to the company. I’d say she’d be more valuable to the company than other former WWE performers like Ruby and Ember.
|
|
|
Post by Artie Kendall on Dec 14, 2022 17:29:56 GMT -5
Her day will come, just like those that paved the way before her.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 14, 2022 17:38:00 GMT -5
I'm not defending the decision to fire her but it looks like it goes a bit further than a couple of naughty pictures. They're not gonna release a 400+ day reign Women's champion lightly. I've also heard people say she uses the Mandy Rose name to help profit from it which is obviously not gonna help her case either. Can't say I agree with it, but sounds like they're well within their rights to let her go.
|
|
|
Post by Funk The Revival on Dec 14, 2022 17:40:52 GMT -5
I've done a little research on this subject and Mandy's current photos and gifs were definitely pushing beyond the old Playboy photos. I'm guessing she wanted out. I wouldn't have released her, but I'm also not running a publicly traded company.
|
|
boss
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 18, 2012 2:38:06 GMT -5
Posts: 335
|
Post by boss on Dec 14, 2022 17:46:06 GMT -5
This literally feels like a gut shot.
She did an amazing job holding down the nxt women’s division.
She helped in my opinion to bring up a number of young talent.
Also- great match with Roxanne this weekend.
This is a huge bummer.
|
|
Teddy Bearburg
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 5, 2022 15:01:46 GMT -5
Posts: 392
|
Post by Teddy Bearburg on Dec 14, 2022 17:57:49 GMT -5
Mattel had a problem with the photos They couldn't scan them correctly for the figure?
|
|
Teddy Bearburg
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 5, 2022 15:01:46 GMT -5
Posts: 392
|
Post by Teddy Bearburg on Dec 14, 2022 18:23:19 GMT -5
I feel bad for Gigi & Jacy. Who knows what happens to them now.
|
|
|
Post by hitmancmedge on Dec 14, 2022 18:29:35 GMT -5
Just read an article where it said sponsors and partners were pissed. It sucks but any of you can see like if Fox or NBC or Mattel are pissed, Mandy Rose isn’t worth those partners being mad at wwe. That’s unfortunately how business works.
|
|
Teddy Bearburg
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 5, 2022 15:01:46 GMT -5
Posts: 392
|
Post by Teddy Bearburg on Dec 14, 2022 18:33:35 GMT -5
Just read an article where it said sponsors and partners were pissed. It sucks but any of you can see like if Fox or NBC or Mattel are pissed, Mandy Rose isn’t worth those partners being mad at wwe. That’s unfortunately how business works. The article I read said that WWE was worried it might make their sponsors mad. I couldn't find the article that said the sponsors WERE mad.
|
|
|
Post by Its Tiffy Time on Dec 14, 2022 19:04:41 GMT -5
Mattel's mad at some nude photos that arent hurting anyone hell that no minor can even access, but they arent outraged at the usos multiple duis or riddle snorting coke backstage, Mattel has some weird morals.
|
|
|
Post by The American Daydream on Dec 14, 2022 19:17:20 GMT -5
No one will even care about this in sixth months. it's been a couple hours and I already don't care
|
|
|
Post by WWFAttitudeEraFan on Dec 14, 2022 19:22:03 GMT -5
Vince McMahon, Jerry Lawler, Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair, Shawn Michaels, Stone Cold, Randy Orton, Riddle, The Usos, Jimmy Snuka, Randy Savage (possibly?), etc, etc. The list goes on, and on on what these guys have done (have possibly done) in the past, yet they’ve all gotten TONS of free passes, or minimal punishment at best.
Breach of contract, or not, what Mandy Rose got fired for is absolutely lighthearted compared to what everyone else above has done, or has been accused of. I’m a fan of everyone I mentioned, but give me a break. If we’re being honest here, a good portion of the roster would probably be fired, or in jail at this point for the things they do off screen.
|
|
stratusfaction23
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 29, 2002 17:18:17 GMT -5
Posts: 2,007
|
Post by stratusfaction23 on Dec 14, 2022 19:37:04 GMT -5
So Mattel is mad about Mandy Rose but they ended up making figures of Chyna? lol
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Dec 14, 2022 19:38:24 GMT -5
Mattel's mad at some nude photos that arent hurting anyone hell that no minor can even access, but they arent outraged at the usos multiple duis or riddle snorting coke backstage, Mattel has some weird morals. You have a weird care with how a publicly traded company, that you have no stock in, run their business and deal with their contracts.
|
|