|
Post by GoD Mooooode βπ½π on Jan 6, 2023 22:26:38 GMT -5
It would make Bayley a Disney Princess though. I prefer Asuka 
|
|
|
Post by GoD Mooooode βπ½π on Jan 6, 2023 22:27:30 GMT -5
People get upset when I tell them I don't vote. Same here. Especially my father in law. While I understand to an extent, itβs my decision. I think theyβre both crooks and POS. Iβm tired of feeling like Iβm βforcedβ to choose the lesser of two evils. your body your choice
|
|
|
Post by Ministry of Darkness on Jan 7, 2023 0:42:57 GMT -5
Maybe Disney will buy WWE? If another conglomerate buys WWE the product will suffer with more PC and woke decisions. π Oh god no That's why private ownership is best and one of the reasons the WWF was able to defeat WCW because Vince could push the envelope while WCW was restricted on how far they're could.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Jan 7, 2023 8:20:03 GMT -5
Apparently all talent have been informed Triple H will remain in creative. Take that with however big of a pinch of salt you see fit. If that is the case though and Vince is just coming in for the business aspect of things, whatever, come and make even more money than anyone will ever need. As long as I don't see any big changes on screen reverting back to the old ways I couldn't really care tbh.
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 7, 2023 8:41:28 GMT -5
Is he trying to completely sell the company? From what I read, it sounded like he was looking to sell aspects of the company, like the media/video division, but not the whole company. Or is he using the line "I will help you sell the company, but I have to be put back as CEO to do it" as a way to get back in the company, and he isn't really going to sell it to anyone?
|
|
|
Post by J-MANN: Trios Champion on Jan 7, 2023 10:15:11 GMT -5
Who do you guys think would be the best buyer for WWE?
|
|
|
Post by GoD Mooooode βπ½π on Jan 7, 2023 12:50:24 GMT -5
I would prefer a massive swerve where the McMahons buy the WWE. Take it private and put out a better product.
|
|
|
Post by Toy Hawker on Jan 7, 2023 13:44:57 GMT -5
Who do you guys think would be the best buyer for WWE? Tony Khan
|
|
|
Post by WWFAttitudeEraFan on Jan 7, 2023 16:59:35 GMT -5
Why in the world would you sell your company to an outsider, and not keep it in the family? I figured heβd let his immediate family take over once he was done. Once sold, he has no say over whatβs done with it, or itβs IP.
The new owners decide to close up shop, and shut it down, they can do that. Would they? Super unlikely, but always a possibility. But if he was dumb enough to sell, Iβd say NBC Universal, considering their history since the 1980βs, and itβs been the home of Raw since the 1990βs.
|
|
|
Post by WWFAttitudeEraFan on Jan 7, 2023 17:00:38 GMT -5
Who do you guys think would be the best buyer for WWE? NBC Universal, considering their history together, IF he sold.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Jan 7, 2023 18:45:04 GMT -5
Why in the world would you sell your company to an outsider, and not keep it in the family? I figured heβd let his immediate family take over once he was done. Once sold, he has no say over whatβs done with it, or itβs IP. The new owners decide to close up shop, and shut it down, they can do that. Would they? Super unlikely, but always a possibility. But if he was dumb enough to sell, Iβd say NBC Universal, considering their history since the 1980βs, and itβs been the home of Raw since the 1990βs. canβt assume, but I have seen scenarios where individuals hold large stakes in companies and refuse to give it to the next generation. their egos simply canβt allow the idea that anyone else could be competent to replace them.
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Jan 7, 2023 20:08:02 GMT -5
Lmao so basically. He never really left
I kept telling y'all the product wasn't much different.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jan 7, 2023 20:12:21 GMT -5
Lmao so basically. He never really left I kept telling y'all the product wasn't much different. The product is definitely different, because Hunter is at the helm of creative. The booking of who gets out where on the card and the overall storyline angles. The company isnβt different, because Vince has been still running it behind the scenes the whole time. The look of the shows, etc.
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Jan 7, 2023 20:22:44 GMT -5
Lmao so basically. He never really left I kept telling y'all the product wasn't much different. The product is definitely different, because Hunter is at the helm of creative. The booking of who gets out where on the card and the overall storyline angles. The company isnβt different, because Vince has been still running it behind the scenes the whole time. The look of the shows, etc. It's really not that much different.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jan 7, 2023 20:24:39 GMT -5
Who do you guys think would be the best buyer for WWE? 
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 7, 2023 20:38:37 GMT -5
Who do you guys think would be the best buyer for WWE?  That's funny, and a little sad. It reminds me of all the Toysrus's that closed down around here.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jan 7, 2023 21:17:59 GMT -5
Out of interest how can a company be sold if it's owned by different shareholders?
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jan 7, 2023 21:21:01 GMT -5
Out of interest how can a company be sold if it's owned by different shareholders? Vince owns at least 50% of the shares. So his decision would override anything else.
|
|
|
Post by GoD Mooooode βπ½π on Jan 7, 2023 21:46:15 GMT -5
Out of interest how can a company be sold if it's owned by different shareholders? watch Mr. Deeds
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 7, 2023 21:47:36 GMT -5
Out of interest how can a company be sold if it's owned by different shareholders? If he holds the majority of the shares, which I think he still does, he could at the very least sell his shares to someone else, then that person would now hold the majority of the shares and technically be in charge. Also, didn't he get rid of most of the board, now it's just 3 people?
|
|