Things you've always questioned

 Yup. by 1995 he looked like a complete idiot.....

*Two guys hate each other but one of them turns heel or face and then they are best friends.

*Why didn't Vince just fire the guys he hated (Austin, Rock, Taker etc)

*In a Falls Count Anywhere Match a wrestler is near dead outside, but when when the ref's count reaches 8 they regain super strength and make it to their feet.

*Do heels and faces have separate locker rooms to prevent a brawl from erupting.

*The Pedigree. In order to do that move the opponent has to jump and stretch out his legs, why do that?

* Undertaker burned Kane as a child so why did his father Paul Bearer manage him?

* Sting's WWE debut. They pretended that Sting hadn't been seen or heard of since WCW and yet it was common knowledge that during the 00's he had a huge run in TNA.

Ok this took a different route than I originally thought!

If going on the actual logic of wrestling side of things - my biggest one was if in steel cage matches, why on earth would any wrestler EVER attempt to climb out of the cage, when they could just ask the ref to open the door. It's the most asinine thing that comes to my mind.
Yes, it serves to make the stakes higher (similar to slow climbing a ladder when really you could climb normally), but the logic of having a door that could be opened on a whim takes the need to climb the cage away. It is an antiquated rule that needs retiring.

They could easily have it that the door remains locked at all times. But the ref does hold the key, and the only circumstances the door is to be opened is when there's a storyline injury (eg the Mankind vs Undertaker HiaC in 1998) or an ally of the heel knocks the ref down and takes the key. That makes total sense and doesn't take away the door aspect completely. It just means there won't be a crawl to the door spot several times in the match.

People who rush to the ring during the rumble

They made money for the company and if they were fired fans would kayfabe tune out

I’ve never thought the pipe bomb was a shoot. If his contract was almost up and he hadn’t re-signed yet, I don’t see any way they let him go out there and talk about Vince dying and trashing HHH and Steph and the top draws. Especially since he was apparently so miserable working there, I don’t see them saying “yeah, you’re leaving. That’s fine. Please go out and bury the company on live tv.” It was way more of a work than a shoot, imo.

I question why so many other top guys seem to get a pass for all the BS they pulled to stay at the top, things they’ve said privately or publicly, etc.. but Hogan and Shawn Michaels are usually shredded apart for their actions.

Wrestlers or wrestling personalities that point fingers at others for “killing kayfabe” when they have also done things to break the 4th wall.

Why did WCW continue on with the Starrcade 97 finish if they weren’t confident in Sting? Why have that ass finish and still put the belt on Sting if he wasn’t in shape, tanned, sober or whatever the hell else was the problem.

How did WCW fumble Bret Hart so badly?

Why Vince never made Austin defend his title straight away after winning in a big match. Vince did this with Cena before when he had Batista come down & beat him after a big title defence. But McMahon never did this with Austin.

In the late 70s-early 80s, it was to give a main event match on regular TV. If the non champions won, it would usually set up for a program.
I remember Rocky Johnson pinning Don Muraco (who had the Intercontinental title at the time). But Muraco's foot was on the bottom rope. The referee didn't see it & the crowd went crazy. This set up for a brief feud between them, with Muraco usually winning by disqualification.

This