bosox3
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 21, 2015 21:16:33 GMT -5
Posts: 506 
|
Post by bosox3 on Mar 26, 2023 16:40:45 GMT -5
Just because its "Monday night wars" doesn't mean its going to be 2 sets. All that means is it’s going to be during that time period. Two things to think about here: 1) Do you actually think WWE would let Mattel make a whole crowd fund around just WCW, aka the losing side, and announce it during the biggest weekend of the year for WWE, and not have WWE represented at all in it? 2) Why even mention the “wars” if it’s just gonna be WCW? Why not just say it’s a homage to Monday Nitro. Mentioning the wars is a clear giveaway it’ll be both sides. yes and no though. they own WCW... so it doesnt matter who won or not. Its not like they are making a AEW set. The term "wars" meaning that time frame. The title of Monday night wars doesnt mean they need to make sets from both.. just that they will include wrestlers from that time period. They will need to either make this entirely too expensive.. or cheap out on the set.. then why even bother. |
|
|
|
Post by WrestlingFigWig on Mar 27, 2023 13:22:29 GMT -5
Two things to think about here: 1) Do you actually think WWE would let Mattel make a whole crowd fund around just WCW, aka the losing side, and announce it during the biggest weekend of the year for WWE, and not have WWE represented at all in it? 2) Why even mention the “wars” if it’s just gonna be WCW? Why not just say it’s a homage to Monday Nitro. Mentioning the wars is a clear giveaway it’ll be both sides. yes and no though. they own WCW... so it doesnt matter who won or not. Its not like they are making a AEW set. The term "wars" meaning that time frame. The title of Monday night wars doesnt mean they need to make sets from both.. just that they will include wrestlers from that time period. They will need to either make this entirely too expensive.. or cheap out on the set.. then why even bother. Annnnnnd you were right. |
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Mar 27, 2023 19:12:49 GMT -5
|
|
