|
|
Post by sickchrismondo on Jul 19, 2007 13:12:04 GMT -5
:l
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 14:50:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2007 14:21:29 GMT -5
wsx was the shit
|
|
|
|
Post by blackcherry on Jul 19, 2007 14:33:24 GMT -5
What a suprise, a post on the Indy board that involves a page worth of arguing.
*thumbs up* on that boys and girls
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jul 19, 2007 21:23:45 GMT -5
To be honest, I never liked Taue...
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jul 19, 2007 21:29:54 GMT -5
What a suprise, a post on the Indy board that involves a page worth of arguing. *thumbs up* on that boys and girls Becca had no involvement in it, so you must be trying to imply something.  |
|
|
|
Post by blackcherry on Jul 20, 2007 6:28:20 GMT -5
What a suprise, a post on the Indy board that involves a page worth of arguing. *thumbs up* on that boys and girls Becca had no involvement in it, so you must be trying to imply something. meh, just my saying. That or ladies and gentleman is a personal fave. |
|
|
|
Post by cureforthesickness on Jul 20, 2007 8:44:23 GMT -5
What a suprise, a post on the Indy board that involves a page worth of arguing. *thumbs up* on that boys and girls Becca had no involvement in it, so you must be trying to imply something. with faint traces of Mia Porter still dancing through his head.. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jul 20, 2007 11:09:38 GMT -5
Becca had no involvement in it, so you must be trying to imply something. with faint traces of Mia Porter still dancing through his head.. If you honestly think I was mia porter you're on drugs, far worse than any character can portray. Now Amerie, that's another story for a different time..... |
|
|
|
Post by The Raven Effect on Jul 23, 2007 15:39:02 GMT -5
Cover added folks. Looks awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by holic08 on Jul 23, 2007 15:59:34 GMT -5
This does look awesome.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 14:50:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2007 16:05:37 GMT -5
christly cover art
|
|
|
|
Post by holic08 on Jul 23, 2007 16:08:15 GMT -5
Here is my thoughts on WSX: I liked it because it didn't try to be someone amazingly complex wrestling promotion. More or less, it was like "  it...let's give the people some entertainment." TNA comes off as trying to be so serious and features so many guys that are passed their prime. Why watch the same theme of wrestling with guys like Rhino, Abyss, The Steiners, Jarrett and more when I can watch it with Sydal, Scorpio, DIFH, etc.? Plus, I really am not a fan of "OMGZ matwork". Psychology is a must, but the indies is pretty void of that anyway. Really, if I want matwork for the sake of matwork, I'll watch 2006 Nigel or 1985 Flair. I love Puro junior wrestling with exciting moves rather than the mundane "hit him hard for a while" style of the 1990s AJPW. I love spots and flippy wrestling. It's fun. Sorry if that conflicts with others opinions. |
|
Jordan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 21, 2005 10:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 3,515
|
Post by Jordan on Jul 23, 2007 16:13:37 GMT -5
Was just about to post the cover art, seems i was beaten to it.  Thinking about it i cannot frigging wait to get this. I really can't. It'll be awesome. |
|
|
|
Post by Jericho Is God!™ on Jul 23, 2007 16:17:58 GMT -5
i will be getting this dvd when it comes out, the cover looks cool
|
|
Tazmission
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 23, 2002 11:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,331
|
Post by Tazmission on Jul 23, 2007 16:32:17 GMT -5
I'll buy it just for the finale w/ Genki Horiguchi in an exploding cage.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 14:50:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2007 17:49:48 GMT -5
Here is my thoughts on WSX: I liked it because it didn't try to be someone amazingly complex wrestling promotion. More or less, it was like " it...let's give the people some entertainment." TNA comes off as trying to be so serious and features so many guys that are passed their prime. Why watch the same theme of wrestling with guys like Rhino, Abyss, The Steiners, Jarrett and more when I can watch it with Sydal, Scorpio, DIFH, etc.? Plus, I really am not a fan of "OMGZ matwork". Psychology is a must, but the indies is pretty void of that anyway. Really, if I want matwork for the sake of matwork, I'll watch 2006 Nigel or 1985 Flair. I love Puro junior wrestling with exciting moves rather than the mundane "hit him hard for a while" style of the 1990s AJPW. I love spots and flippy wrestling. It's fun. Sorry if that conflicts with others opinions. dont appologise |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jul 24, 2007 1:00:43 GMT -5
The thing is, people bash stuff all the time for lacking selling, for lacking psychology, for lacking mat work, etc., yet LOVE this? When you read a review of a match or something, people nit-pick at the exact same things that WSX features. SO, I have no clue why this is so popular when I guarantee 95% of the people that say they like WSX on here have bashed another match or whatever for something WSX lacks...which makes no sense to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eyce on Jul 24, 2007 8:06:37 GMT -5
The thing is, people bash stuff all the time for lacking selling, for lacking psychology, for lacking mat work, etc., yet LOVE this? When you read a review of a match or something, people nit-pick at the exact same things that WSX features. Dude, there's several things that I'd like to draw to your attention. 1. Marketing. 2. Context. 3. Target Audience. I'm pretty sure when you think about it, you'll answer your own Question. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jul 24, 2007 9:59:15 GMT -5
No. Trying to say "omg they have exploding piranha's" and "this isn't supposed to e for wrestling fans" still doesn't cover the fact that people are enjoying the matches when they have all criticized the same stuff.
|
|
SystemofaDan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 17, 2006 11:42:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,397
|
Post by SystemofaDan on Jul 24, 2007 11:04:40 GMT -5
WSX was my fav wrestling Promotion I loved it So i am definatly gonna buy this DVD  |
|
