|
|
Post by wcw24 on Sept 10, 2007 12:58:06 GMT -5
What's the deal? For a little over a year people have been praying for a 2 hr. show, now that it was announced last night; people are now complaining that it isnt going to be live! First off; what made people think that it was going to be live in the first place? This competition with the WWE is going to take time. To go live will be another big step, and the ratings have to show that its going to be worth it.
Dixie and Jeff are doing the right thing by taking the slow road to success. If you go too fast; it may be the demise of the company, and Vince is going to be laughing his ass off!
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Sept 10, 2007 12:59:21 GMT -5
I wanted two hours back when TNA was decent, now that I crapout products better than TNA I couldn't care less.  'em. |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Sept 10, 2007 13:00:26 GMT -5
TNA getting 2 hours doesn't make the booking of the past "fine"
Until i see improvement on Storylines and use of Talent the 2 hours is basically useless and the low ratings will show.
|
|
|
|
Post by sqeaker300 on Sept 10, 2007 13:44:39 GMT -5
Fans aren't happy because, instead of two hours of WRESTLING, it looks like we'll probably be getting two hours of Kurt Angle and his wife mugging it up for the camera, Abyss chasing after his "brother" and Pacman Jones mumbling incoherently and shitting up the ring with his "skills."
|
|
|
|
Post by timebombversion420 on Sept 10, 2007 14:11:48 GMT -5
well why not just wait an see what TNA does with the 2 hours before judging the product.....
|
|
|
|
Post by sqeaker300 on Sept 10, 2007 14:15:01 GMT -5
well why not just wait an see what TNA does with the 2 hours before judging the product..... If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. |
|
|
|
Post by JCLS on Sept 10, 2007 14:30:09 GMT -5
I'm glad they got 2 hours, quality of the product aside. Hopefully though the 2 hours will allow for better booking.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Sept 10, 2007 15:46:29 GMT -5
well why not just wait an see what TNA does with the 2 hours before judging the product..... If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. wtf? the past TNA ppv's have been good, you obviously have been brainwashed by that WWE bull shit. |
|
|
|
Post by sqeaker300 on Sept 10, 2007 16:05:01 GMT -5
If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. wtf? the past TNA ppv's have been good, you obviously have been brainwashed by that WWE bull ****. Since when did wasting valuable PPV airtime on a no-talent football player who can barely speak English and a wrestler's wife whose acting in skits rival that of a bad porn actress become a GOOD thing?  |
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Sept 10, 2007 16:22:16 GMT -5
wrestler's wife whose acting in skits rival that of a bad porn actress become a GOOD thing?  If you're talking about Karen Angle, then it makes no sense. She does surprisingly good in her job and most people have praised her backstage work. |
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Sept 10, 2007 16:35:13 GMT -5
If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. wtf? the past TNA ppv's have been good, you obviously have been brainwashed by that WWE bull ****. Talk about brainwashed... |
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Sept 10, 2007 16:50:00 GMT -5
2 Hours is worse if anything...now there's two hours of crap.
Unless TNA goes under a makeover, then I won't be watching the 2 Hour debut or any of the other shows.
|
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Sept 10, 2007 16:51:04 GMT -5
If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. wtf? the past TNA ppv's have been good, you obviously have been brainwashed by that WWE bull ****. Coming from the guy with a link to TNA's website in his sig... |
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Sept 10, 2007 17:02:04 GMT -5
The internet wrestling fans dont know shit! All they know how to do is complain! If you dont like it dont watch it; then you wont have a reason to post a complaint. There are more fans than you that do like what TNA has done. Hell; its alot better than it was 2 years ago!
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Sept 10, 2007 17:03:54 GMT -5
We don't which is why they get the same 1.0 every week lol...
|
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Sept 10, 2007 17:07:12 GMT -5
The internet wrestling fans dont know ****! All they know how to do is complain! If you dont like it dont watch it; then you wont have a reason to post a complaint. There are more fans than you that do like what TNA has done. Hell; its alot better than it was 2 years ago! Are you ing serious? This company was 100 times better in 2005 than it is now. The whole "Don't like it, don't watch it" argument is so old. Enough already. Please come back to reality... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 9:04:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2007 17:32:31 GMT -5
If the past couple of pay-per-views are any indication, I think we have a right to be worried. wtf? the past TNA ppv's have been good, you obviously have been brainwashed by that WWE bull ****. HAHAHAHA, I enjoy TNA, but to say the past couple of PPVs have been good is the only bullcraparound here |
|
|
|
Post by Rant Casey on Sept 10, 2007 18:01:05 GMT -5
The internet wrestling fans dont know ****! All they know how to do is complain! If you dont like it dont watch it; then you wont have a reason to post a complaint. There are more fans than you that do like what TNA has done. Hell; its alot better than it was 2 years ago! I'm sorry, but what the are you on? Go back and watch Unbreakable from 2005, that is one of the best PPV's ever, with a main event that has not been topped since then in neither the WWE or TNA. No Surrender might have been good last night, but I doubt it was on the same level as Unbreakable. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Sept 10, 2007 18:05:39 GMT -5
The internet wrestling fans dont know ****! All they know how to do is complain! If you dont like it dont watch it; then you wont have a reason to post a complaint. There are more fans than you that do like what TNA has done. Hell; its alot better than it was 2 years ago! One, if you can't handle our opinions, don't read them. Two, if you actually think TNA is better now than in 2005, I don't even know which TNA your watching. So your saying TNA is better, now that they pushed guys like Joe, Shelley, Styles, Daniels, Sabin, Bentley, Aries, Williams, and others to the side? It's better now that all the guys that put TNA where it's at are now playing second fiddle to ex-WWE talent (who don't even help the ratings or buyrates, which TNA apologists seem to think)? |
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Sept 10, 2007 19:05:04 GMT -5
Here's the fact..You NET fans are acrobat fans. You are into what you THINK is wresting; the high flying acrobats like the Gay(LOOK AT MY HAND) Motor City Machine Guns, Christopher Daniels, Shark Boy (Stupid Gimmick)..ETC. That acrobat crapthat is sooo noticeably scripted especially with the speed of it. What is it about this acrobat crapthat you people like? You talk about technicallity, but yet; there is nothing technical about it, just acrobat shit.
Wrestling isnt about speed and agility; its about ENTERTAINMENT, and to me...that isnt entertainment! If I wanted to watch Jumping and climbing and flying; I'd go to the circus and watch that shit!
|
|
