|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Nov 21, 2007 2:17:44 GMT -5
She is not her husband. But I do feel that people will vote for her to try and get back to those years. To what years? Have people forgotten that the Clinton years were filled with scandal after scandal after scandal? Not to say that Bush has been any better, but putting a Clinton in the White House hardly qualifies as change in Washington. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Nov 21, 2007 2:23:56 GMT -5
She is not her husband. But I do feel that people will vote for her to try and get back to those years. To what years? Have people forgotten that the Clinton years were filled with scandal after scandal after scandal? Not to say that Bush has been any better, but putting a Clinton in the White House hardly qualifies as change in Washington. About 90% of Clinton's scandals were free of American military casualties. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Nov 21, 2007 2:31:14 GMT -5
She is not her husband. But I do feel that people will vote for her to try and get back to those years. To what years? Have people forgotten that the Clinton years were filled with scandal after scandal after scandal? Not to say that Bush has been any better, but putting a Clinton in the White House hardly qualifies as change in Washington. And nothing came of those scandals. Except Monica. If Ken Starr could have gotten Bill or Hillary on anything, he would have. This is a different Clinton and we won't live through those scandals again. Unless the Republicans bring it up, but if Giuliani gets the nom, I don't think he should talk about scandals. |
|
ra24sabu
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
BRING THIS BACK!!!!
Joined on: Aug 29, 2007 22:31:11 GMT -5
Posts: 2,086 
|
Post by ra24sabu on Nov 21, 2007 2:44:27 GMT -5
Scared the crap out of me when he put his fist to the screen. I literally ducked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Nov 21, 2007 4:51:05 GMT -5
I still fail to see how going from Bush to Clinton to Bush to Clinton again constitutes change. I would love to see anyone not named Bush or Clinton win. To be honest though, I haven't been impressed with any candidate out there except for Ron Paul and he doesn't have a snowball's chance of winning.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 21, 2007 4:54:12 GMT -5
Haha. Awesome video.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Nov 21, 2007 11:53:23 GMT -5
Ron Paul is a racist nutjob.
I don't see how, just because her last name is Clinton means that she will not bring change.
|
|
