|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Jan 3, 2008 5:42:56 GMT -5
I have a problem with the partial birth abortions, the others (where your just scrambling the yoke of an egg) doesnt really bother me that much. Honestly the biggest deal to me is International Relationships, cause if we piss enough people off we'll get our asses blown off this planet and it wont matter whos sticking a hanger in whos womb. NO!! U see that is the debatable part. IT IS NOT SCRAMBLING A YOKE. THAT IS DISGUSTING THE WAY U SAID THAT. NO OFFENSE. This "YOKE!!" will eventaully become a HUMAN!!!!!!! HUMAN!!!! OMG MAN!!OMG. ARE CATHOLICS THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT HUMAN LIFE. I AM GETTING READY TO THROW UP I don't know whats going on in here (I'm Irish, i get a free pass to be ignorant) and I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I had to comment just to let you know, TNAowns, that you are a fool. I believe abortion is acceptable if at an early stage and it will benefit the former soon-to-be mother. Whilst I believe G-Money was a little harsh with his egg line (lol) i agree with him. Also, just wanted to mention, about this post: You're kidding right? I've heard these things Slappy quoted Huck-Huck as having said. All of that that Huckabee has said, especially the whole "being gay is a public health risk" thing is just straight up bull **** influenced by his beliefs. These beliefs thinly veil discrimination and sexism. Huckabee is a former minister. A Minister in my opinion is the last person that should ever be president. There is a little something in this country called the "separation of church and state". No matter how much some people want you to forget about it and how it has been neglected by the current administration, it's still there, it's still in the constitution. The last person we need in office is someone who would constantly be influenced by their religious beliefs as to what stance they take on issues. You should take a stance on an issue based on logic, not rules written for a easilly lead on primitive society. Being gay is not a public health risk. Unless you are a narrow minded prick, someone else being gay should not affect you in any way. -CMD Very, very well said. I also agree with Slappy on the gay thing. If Hucklebee or whatever it is become president then I'd assume Gay rights go out the window? Either way, to dislike someone because of their sexual orientation is disgusting. The same people here who say that being gay is a 'public health risk' (LOL) are the same people who most likely whack off watching lesbian porn every night. So i agree with Slappy, and congrats to CMD for a well written reply... Now.. watch me as i disappear... or just go somewhere else.. |
|
|
|
Post by cosmo on Jan 3, 2008 5:45:55 GMT -5
Calm down and take a deeeeeep breath and try to read again. I never said YOU couldnt vote. I said you were the one on the board thats FILLED WITH MINORS (under 18) thats cant vote. Most of which dont care. This will be my 3rd presidential election im voting in and i will vote for how I feel. Thats the joy of being an american. If your against abortion then you should also be against the War and For gun control because they both kill people as well true, but war isnt thoughtless. war isnt just killing for no reason. with this country its for a reason. whther its to defend us etc. abortion is just killing cuz u dont want to pay for condoms. California is so pathetic, a proposition stating that if minors are to have an abortion they must have the parents informed about. THAT DIDNT EVEN PASS. THAT JUST SHOWS HOW SICK PEOPLE CAN BE. THAT'S THE LEAST THIS STATE CAN DO. CAL IS THE WORST IN MY OPINION CUZ WE GOT EVERYONE JUMPING THE BORDER, GAYS IN SAN FRAN, KILLING, AND ABORTION. NO OFFENSE TO GAY PEOPLE. I JUST THINK ITS NOT RIGHT. Dude, seriously calm the  down. Obama or Hilary I can imagine in the office. |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jan 3, 2008 5:48:12 GMT -5
I would probably have to agree with you CBT. Whilst i like Hilary more i think Obama is in for the win. But my knowledge of US politics is minor and i cant say with 100% confidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 3, 2008 6:11:36 GMT -5
NO!! U see that is the debatable part. IT IS NOT SCRAMBLING A YOKE. THAT IS DISGUSTING THE WAY U SAID THAT. NO OFFENSE. This "YOKE!!" will eventaully become a HUMAN!!!!!!! HUMAN!!!! OMG MAN!!OMG. ARE CATHOLICS THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT HUMAN LIFE. I AM GETTING READY TO THROW UP I don't know whats going on in here (I'm Irish, i get a free pass to be ignorant) and I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I had to comment just to let you know, TNAowns, that you are a fool. I believe abortion is acceptable if at an early stage and it will benefit the former soon-to-be mother. Whilst I believe G-Money was a little harsh with his egg line (lol) i agree with him. Also, just wanted to mention, about this post: You're kidding right? I've heard these things Slappy quoted Huck-Huck as having said. All of that that Huckabee has said, especially the whole "being gay is a public health risk" thing is just straight up bull **** influenced by his beliefs. These beliefs thinly veil discrimination and sexism. Huckabee is a former minister. A Minister in my opinion is the last person that should ever be president. There is a little something in this country called the "separation of church and state". No matter how much some people want you to forget about it and how it has been neglected by the current administration, it's still there, it's still in the constitution. The last person we need in office is someone who would constantly be influenced by their religious beliefs as to what stance they take on issues. You should take a stance on an issue based on logic, not rules written for a easilly lead on primitive society. Being gay is not a public health risk. Unless you are a narrow minded prick, someone else being gay should not affect you in any way. -CMD Very, very well said. I also agree with Slappy on the gay thing. If Hucklebee or whatever it is become president then I'd assume Gay rights go out the window? Either way, to dislike someone because of their sexual orientation is disgusting. The same people here who say that being gay is a 'public health risk' (LOL) are the same people who most likely whack off watching lesbian porn every night. So i agree with Slappy, and congrats to CMD for a well written reply... Now.. watch me as i disappear... or just go somewhere else.. Eh you should know by now i say what i feel. Its healthy for you. Maybe the Yoke comment might have been a lil harsh. But look at the unborn Embryo, it looks like an egg yoke |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 3, 2008 6:41:52 GMT -5
nothing wrong with interracial relationships I've never understood why anyone would say there is. I've never been attracted to someone who's another race, but if you are and you're both adults, knock yourself out. |
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Jan 3, 2008 6:47:39 GMT -5
I don't know whats going on in here (I'm Irish, i get a free pass to be ignorant) and I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I had to comment just to let you know, TNAowns, that you are a fool. I believe abortion is acceptable if at an early stage and it will benefit the former soon-to-be mother. Whilst I believe G-Money was a little harsh with his egg line (lol) i agree with him. Also, just wanted to mention, about this post: Very, very well said. I also agree with Slappy on the gay thing. If Hucklebee or whatever it is become president then I'd assume Gay rights go out the window? Either way, to dislike someone because of their sexual orientation is disgusting. The same people here who say that being gay is a 'public health risk' (LOL) are the same people who most likely whack off watching lesbian porn every night. So i agree with Slappy, and congrats to CMD for a well written reply... Now.. watch me as i disappear... or just go somewhere else.. Eh you should know by now i say what i feel. Its healthy for you. Maybe the Yoke comment might have been a lil harsh. But look at the unborn Embryo, it looks like an egg yoke Oh I know you do. And i respect your opinions and I understand that you wouldnt lie to people and tell the truth. I think other people should listen to what you say and adjust themselves accordingly: Best Newcomer Member- KKV ;D |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 3, 2008 6:51:55 GMT -5
Eh you should know by now i say what i feel. Its healthy for you. Maybe the Yoke comment might have been a lil harsh. But look at the unborn Embryo, it looks like an egg yoke Oh I know you do. And i respect your opinions and I understand that you wouldnt lie to people and tell the truth. I think other people should listen to what you say and adjust themselves accordingly: Best Newcomer Member- KKV ;D LOL i forgot all about that |
|
|
|
Post by hammerzeit on Jan 3, 2008 11:30:27 GMT -5
I see nothing at all wrong with this. Huckabee is the right person to lead this country, and absolutely should be President. You're kidding right? I've heard these things Slappy quoted Huck-Huck as having said. All of that that Huckabee has said, especially the whole "being gay is a public health risk" thing is just straight up bull **** influenced by his beliefs. These beliefs thinly veil discrimination and sexism. Huckabee is a former minister. A Minister in my opinion is the last person that should ever be president. There is a little something in this country called the "separation of church and state". No matter how much some people want you to forget about it and how it has been neglected by the current administration, it's still there, it's still in the constitution. The last person we need in office is someone who would constantly be influenced by their religious beliefs as to what stance they take on issues. You should take a stance on an issue based on logic, not rules written for a easilly lead on primitive society. Being gay is not a public health risk. Unless you are a narrow minded prick, someone else being gay should not affect you in any way. In a perfect world, the next president would be Henry Rollins. The man kicks ass, plain and simple. But I find myself kinda behind Obama. He's a fresh face, and we could get behind him with a parody of "Hulkamania" called "Obamaramma", as in "Obamaramma is runnin' wild!" -CMD Again with this nonsense. There is NO SUCH THING as separation of church and state, no where in any legally binding document does such a thing exist, it was invented in the 80's by the ACLU who wanted to attack religion and minimize it's importance in society. The only thing the law says is that the country cannot establish an offigicial government sanctioned religion that they force you to follow. That's it, there's nothing in there about not allowing public officials to have or express religious views, nor is there anything in there about it not being able to affect their decision making. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 11:36:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Jan 3, 2008 11:42:10 GMT -5
I can honestly see Hillary and Mit in the actual elections, so I can see both in office.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Sam Kinnison Corps on Jan 3, 2008 12:34:04 GMT -5
 Who better to prepare the country for the end of the world in 2012? |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Jan 3, 2008 12:35:22 GMT -5
Who better to prepare the country for the end of the world in 2012? I <3 Tre |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 3, 2008 12:38:51 GMT -5
Note that it never says a religious person can't hold public office. Nor does it say that you can't pass laws based on religious principles. (I'm not saying that's the best way to legislate, I'm just saying it's a perfectly legal way to legislate.) |
|
Revvie®
Main Eventer
Somewhere between Reality, and the Absurd
Joined on: Jun 29, 2005 1:04:26 GMT -5
Posts: 4,327
|
Post by Revvie® on Jan 3, 2008 12:42:38 GMT -5
Who better to prepare the country for the end of the world in 2012? Amen, my brother! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by addam on Jan 3, 2008 12:46:31 GMT -5
I don't want a chauvinistic homophobe in the White House. i agree, as long as huckabee doesn't win then i don't care who does. just please, ANYONE but mike huckabee, i hate that guy soooo much. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 12:48:41 GMT -5
Note that it never says a religious person can't hold public office. Nor does it say that you can't pass laws based on religious principles. (I'm not saying that's the best way to legislate, I'm just saying it's a perfectly legal way to legislate.) I know. But the Republicans make a religious test for office. I don't want another "God told me to do this" guy in the white house. |
|
|
|
Post by Overnight Sensation on Jan 3, 2008 12:49:57 GMT -5
Obama is not experianced enough to be president, I live in the state he is a senator in and im not hearing many things he has done Hilary is a woman and she wouldnt be able to handle it and Bill would end up running everything and god help us there Rudy for president  |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jan 3, 2008 12:52:11 GMT -5
Death sentence when any non-black american uses the 'N' word. Achievement award if the person is black. Community service if the person is of light skinned. The D.A.C. treat.  |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 12:52:31 GMT -5
If you don't want spouses helping out, then don't vote for Rudy. His wife said that she will be sitting in on cabinet meetings and helping out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Overnight Sensation on Jan 3, 2008 13:20:55 GMT -5
thats fine but Bill screwed us over, he coulda taken care of everything we have now but he didnt....the only good thing he ever did was take credit for Reaganomics
plus anyone that wants us to pull out of the war now is an idiot, everything we have done would go to shit
|
|
