|
|
Post by T R W on Jan 3, 2008 14:54:07 GMT -5
Why not? The majority of Americans are still God fearing Christians. That would represent the majority of America. "Majority" means most, not all. While they do cater to the Moral Majority for the most part, they should serve all Americans. And if they try to make laws favoring Christians, we will obviously get the aformentioned ACLU all over their asses. -CMD So you are telling me that only someone who represents all Americans should be elected? Essentially you are saying we should never have a president again, because that just isn't possible. All laws favor Christians because our country was founded upon Christian ideals. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jan 3, 2008 14:54:08 GMT -5
I did the test and got Dennis Kucinich with a score of 33. You sure you read it right? I got Kucinich, but that was the amount of disagreements, the bottom person is the most agreeable candidate. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 14:57:51 GMT -5
That thing is off. The Dem's don't support NCLB. I put that I don't support it and it says that I differ with the dems on it.
It also says that Edwards and Clinton want military action against Iran, that is false.
I don't believe that Hillary is for a fence, even though it says I differ with her on that. I don't think Obama or Edwards is for one either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rant Casey on Jan 3, 2008 14:58:37 GMT -5
I did the test and got Dennis Kucinich with a score of 33. You sure you read it right? I got Kucinich, but that was the amount of disagreements, the bottom person is the most agreeable candidate. I only had two disagreements with Kucinich, and according to the page the top one is the most agreeable candidate, unless I completely read it wrong, which is completely possible since I'm a little sleepy. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jan 3, 2008 15:00:33 GMT -5
You sure you read it right? I got Kucinich, but that was the amount of disagreements, the bottom person is the most agreeable candidate. I only had two disagreements with Kucinich, and according to the page the top one is the most agreeable candidate, unless I completely read it, which is completely possible since I'm a little sleepy. It's disagreements on top, non-disagreeables swaying to the bottom. How apropos. I wouldn't stress it Slappy, if any one goes off that with real life voting, they should be barred from voting to begin with. |
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jan 3, 2008 15:45:11 GMT -5
Aside from Hilary and Obama, I don't know anyone else in the election. Out of those 2, I reluctantly choose Hilary. Gotta be honest though...
Don't really care at all who wins.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 18:58:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2008 17:12:01 GMT -5
Im thinking Hilary because she has Bill on her side. (Or does she?)
Anyways i think Obama is the antichrist, for some reason he seems evil.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 17:33:03 GMT -5
Edwards and Romney will win tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Jan 3, 2008 19:28:29 GMT -5
If any women/black votes for Hillary or Obama just because of their race/gender they are sexist/racist. I for one liked Hillary being in the running but now after I have heard what she believes in I hope she doesn't. I like Huckabee and made that up 5 or 6 months ago or whenever he started running. I personnally am a republican. Too bad my parents don't care about this as much as me. I'm not even old enough to vote yet I know more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Jan 3, 2008 19:31:53 GMT -5
Im thinking Hilary because she has Bill on her side. (Or does she?) Anyways i think Obama is the antichrist, for some reason he seems evil. I doubt that. I think the antichrist is going to want us to think he is christian. I believe he is Morman. I think Hillary or Obama will win because people want to see history made. I would rather have a good president than just history and I think Hillary is lieing and Obama just doesn't seem right. |
|
Nash
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 9, 2006 10:04:30 GMT -5
Posts: 2,699
|
Post by Nash on Jan 3, 2008 20:06:51 GMT -5
i dont want a woman in the white house QFT. Obama all the way. |
|
|
|
Post by BV on Jan 3, 2008 20:11:47 GMT -5
Barock Obama FTW
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 20:25:43 GMT -5
10% of the precincts reporting
Edwards - 34%
Clinton - 32%
Obama - 31%
Richardson - 2%
Credit CNN
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 20:31:09 GMT -5
Huckabee - 33%
Romney - 24%
Thompson -17%
McCain - 11%
CNN (Unsure of percentage)
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 21:06:55 GMT -5
CNN, NBC, FOX all say Huckabee has won with only like 25% reporting.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sam Kinnison Corps on Jan 3, 2008 21:09:03 GMT -5
To anyone who doesn't want a woman in the white house: why are you all complaining about Hilary? If that rag ain't woman enough for Bill Clinton, "she"'s not woman enough for America.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jan 3, 2008 21:12:05 GMT -5
If any women/black votes for Hillary or Obama just because of their race/gender they are sexist/racist. I for one liked Hillary being in the running but now after I have heard what she believes in I hope she doesn't. I like Huckabee and made that up 5 or 6 months ago or whenever he started running. I personnally am a republican. Too bad my parents don't care about this as much as me. I'm not even old enough to vote yet I know more. You can bet your ass they will. |
|
becca
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 13, 2005 11:20:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,042
|
Post by becca on Jan 3, 2008 21:34:30 GMT -5
Looks like Obama and Huckabee.
Just got back from the caucuses. It was nuts.. Obama's people had about 50% at my precinct. I caucused for Richardson, and we got enough people to get a delegate, which is a pretty big deal, because it kept Obama from getting two. Not surprised by Obama, because of my turnout, but I am SHOCKED by the Huckabee win.. and pretty sickened.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 3, 2008 21:58:58 GMT -5
Obama won Iowa. He won't win NH though.
|
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Jan 3, 2008 22:02:48 GMT -5
I'm shocked that Huckabee won.
|
|
