Underfaker666
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 23, 2004 11:42:48 GMT -5
Posts: 3,540
|
Post by Underfaker666 on Sept 22, 2007 3:44:05 GMT -5
why does it look like their sculpted and not real scans. most of them don't resemble the divas. i though jakks does real scans of all active wrestlers?
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Sept 22, 2007 3:45:57 GMT -5
most of the divas look ok IMO. The RA 28 Torrie and Victoria arent that great. Mickie James head was a lil too big, but Trish, Christy, Ariel and Kelly all looked ok. Kelly needed more make up though around the eyes and not so much blush
|
|
flying-shorty
Main Eventer
Take a bow
Joined on: Jul 12, 2005 8:30:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,778
|
Post by flying-shorty on Sept 22, 2007 3:56:50 GMT -5
The worst has been Torrie Wilson, i just think the women with finer face details have the worst heads...whereas girls like melina and sharmell have good scans as they have more prominent features. I guess it works better for the real scan technology...but i dont work with it so im just guessing
|
|
T-Phunk
Main Eventer
T-Phunkamania Runnin' Wild!!!
Joined on: Jun 23, 2004 11:32:19 GMT -5
Posts: 4,265
|
Post by T-Phunk on Sept 22, 2007 4:03:37 GMT -5
Stacy Keibler has been the best diva scan so far, IMO.
|
|
MakaiClub
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 23, 2003 4:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,477
|
Post by MakaiClub on Sept 22, 2007 4:52:10 GMT -5
I wonder about this too. The new Victoria, Mickie and Candice don't look like scans at all. They've kind of changed the way the heads are constructed, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Sept 22, 2007 5:54:31 GMT -5
The worst has been Torrie Wilson, i just think the women with finer face details have the worst heads...whereas girls like melina and sharmell have good scans as they have more prominent features. I guess it works better for the real scan technology...but i dont work with it so im just guessing The worst for me would have to be Victoria. It just looks nothing like her. With Torrie's head... I guess if painted right it can look like her. But Victoria? She looks like a blow-up sex doll to me. I also don't think Candice's scan looks anything like her. |
|
|
|
Post by Artistix on Sept 22, 2007 6:25:59 GMT -5
Victoria's teeth didn't scan...that's why she looks like a blow up doll. Same with RA Trish figures...no teeth. Takes away a lot of the realism.
Women, who usually have less character marks in their faces (especially WWE Divas or actors) really rely on a good paint job to show the likeness.
Beth has really strong features...her figure should look fine.
Also the scans chosen for RA22/28 Torrie & Candice are faces we don't see very often on the actual women...which makes it harder to see resemblance. Torrie's always smiling, so it was easy to see the likeness wth her first scan.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkvegeta on Sept 22, 2007 6:41:27 GMT -5
actually, i think we never got a real scaned fig since the R3 figs... ever since than they just look at a lot of pics and made one themselves...
|
|
|
|
Post by (=wwefan617=) on Sept 22, 2007 8:18:39 GMT -5
i think alot of the old diva scans like trish and lita were good, but it seems like jakks has been slipping on their diva figures. i mean look at RA 28 torrie she looks like a man lol.
|
|
plasticsuperstar
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 27, 2006 12:58:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,085
|
Post by plasticsuperstar on Sept 22, 2007 9:01:51 GMT -5
I think it's all down to the paintjob, Diva's wear alot of make-up which obviously changes how they look so if the make-up isn't replicated well on the figure then even if the features are the same they will look different. I think that's what went wrong with Kelly Kelly, they didn't give her any eye make-up but they gave her big red cheeks which made her look less feminine and more like a bloke.
|
|
|
|
Post by James St. James on Sept 22, 2007 9:56:33 GMT -5
Candice looks exactly how she does in the picture on the box, its just an expression she doesn't make much since her face turn. Also, her figure was planned and scanned before she broke her nose (and before some other work she had done) so it looks a lot like Candice, its just that the real Candice doesn't look like Candice anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by pg14 on Sept 22, 2007 9:57:27 GMT -5
torrie wilson scan is horrible
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 22, 2007 9:59:35 GMT -5
They arent that bad. Its just for certain expressions that it doesnt work. Jakks do some really uncommon expressions and thats why some dont work. Although some Diva's face scans look great like Sharmell. Hers is perfect.
|
|
