wcw4life
Jobber
Joined on: Sept 25, 2007 23:30:54 GMT -5
Posts: 23
|
Post by wcw4life on Sept 25, 2007 23:44:41 GMT -5
can someone tell me what year this figure is supposed to be based off of?
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Sept 25, 2007 23:45:58 GMT -5
It's really a kind of bizarre amalgam that never actually existed.
|
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Sept 25, 2007 23:49:27 GMT -5
yeah its an amalgamation of his earlier deadman characters.
He has a mixture of purple and white. the real Undertaker wore one or the other.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1lgith on Sept 26, 2007 0:03:58 GMT -5
It was just a way for jakks to crap up a figure that had potential. They do that a lot don't they?
|
|
wcw4life
Jobber
Joined on: Sept 25, 2007 23:30:54 GMT -5
Posts: 23
|
Post by wcw4life on Sept 26, 2007 0:08:57 GMT -5
i wish they would make a correct debut undertaker. i can't imagine why they wouldn't have by now. it would sell like crazy and it is one that should have been made a long time ago seeing as how he is one of the most popular stars in history.
|
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Sept 26, 2007 0:20:58 GMT -5
He came in a double pack with Paul Bearer.
|
|
|
|
Post by tehlance13 on Sept 26, 2007 0:33:13 GMT -5
|
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Sept 26, 2007 0:35:04 GMT -5
head scan on that 'Taker is spot on.
|
|
|
|
Post by hiirocklo on Sept 26, 2007 0:57:51 GMT -5
i have that its awesomeeeee
|
|
wcw4life
Jobber
Joined on: Sept 25, 2007 23:30:54 GMT -5
Posts: 23
|
Post by wcw4life on Sept 27, 2007 14:26:47 GMT -5
i have that 2 pack also. it's awesome but it's still not an actual debut undertaker
|
|
