|
|
Post by GBGav on Jan 27, 2006 7:46:59 GMT -5
Alright, I made a post recently asking for sig size limits. I got a reply from an admin saying it should be no bigger than 1000 pixels, with no one side being larger than 500 pixels. I resized my Father Ted sig so that it was 600x130 something. This was not breaking the limit, so why the hell has it been deleted for a second time? It is too damn confusing and I'm not happy about it. Would someone give me a definition of what is "too wide". I have seen other sigs in this forum that hit the 600 mark and have not been deleted. What's going on?
|
|
|
|
Post by PQ on Jan 27, 2006 7:59:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bjd on Jan 27, 2006 8:27:22 GMT -5
Alright, I made a post recently asking for sig size limits. I got a reply from an admin saying it should be no bigger than 1000 pixels, with no one side being larger than 500 pixels. I resized my Father Ted sig so that it was 600x130 something. This was not breaking the limit, so why the hell has it been deleted for a second time? It is too damn confusing and I'm not happy about it. Would someone give me a definition of what is "too wide". I have seen other sigs in this forum that hit the 600 mark and have not been deleted. What's going on? Your signature was 700-something by 130 something. I was the one who removed it. I could care less if you're not happy about it, when people complain that a signature is stretching their screen, I remove it. If you see a signature larger than yours was, report it. Yours was reported five times. |
|
