MRR
Main Eventer
The Mega Powers
Joined on: Jul 4, 2002 10:39:08 GMT -5
Posts: 2,547
|
Post by MRR on Jul 1, 2007 9:12:39 GMT -5
The largest decline in match quality happened between the years 2005-2006. Everything about WWE has declined since they went back to USA.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Jul 1, 2007 14:02:07 GMT -5
I think a lot of main event bouts still have great quality, especially those including HBK, Edge, etc ..., but two things play a factor. The realism, intensity of the feuds are not as great as they were. The old Steve Austin v.s. Bret Hart fued for example ... the intensity is through the roof and I don't think feuds are as artfully crafted like they were during that time. Another thing I noticed is, while the main event bouts are still amazing many times, the undercard is suffering. The opening matches, the mid-tier bouts are far more lackluster than they used to be. Wrestling will always have its ups and downs though.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Jul 1, 2007 16:14:16 GMT -5
the match quality is fine as long as Cena, Khali, and Umaga arent involved. Its more the feuds.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Jul 1, 2007 17:25:41 GMT -5
The feeling comes and goes. Some matches are bad, some are good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jul 1, 2007 17:30:48 GMT -5
Some are still good, but overall, there's been a decline.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:25:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2007 17:50:29 GMT -5
Match quality seems to increase when business decreases.
I believe the mid 1990s prove that.
|
|
|
|
Post by layzie on Jul 1, 2007 18:13:56 GMT -5
not as much as all of you bitch about...if the majority of you weren't nitpicking every decision WWE makes you might realize all the good ones/matches one day
|
|
