|
Post by taihyll on Jul 6, 2007 13:43:51 GMT -5
Oh how about this being the WORST idea?
|
|
|
Post by vivaciousvixen on Jul 6, 2007 22:09:52 GMT -5
LOL at how people act like their the only people who watch the show.
"You cant entertain me in 2 hours" .. then dont watch seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jul 6, 2007 22:13:30 GMT -5
LOL at how people act like their the only people who watch the show. "You cant entertain me in 2 hours" .. then dont watch seriously.[/quote I mean I dont watch that big forehead ass yamp in your sig because she can't sing and looks like a cretaure from the depths But just because they dont entertain me in 2 hours they have other things that make up for it
|
|
|
Post by xbonex80 on Jul 6, 2007 23:01:15 GMT -5
If they have 3 hour raws, there might not be heat anymore which is good because we can see Cryme Tyme, WGTT and all the up and coming superstars/jobbers, plus some extra time for story lines and matches
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Jul 6, 2007 23:20:24 GMT -5
For some reason this sounds like a bad idea to me..
|
|
|
Post by sim on Jul 6, 2007 23:40:31 GMT -5
What an awful idea. WWE is already putting WAY too much programming out there. Three hour RAW's would really just over-saturate the product. Christ, there's already 4500 PPV's a year, RAW, ECW,Smackdown!, occasionaly SNME, Heat, Velocity, and the syndicated shows. Adding ANOTHER hour of wrestling to WWE's already full schedule is asking a bit too much, imo.
Remember what lead to the downfall of the 90's boom? Oversaturation of the wrestling product. I mean christ, at one point on television we had three hour Nitro's, RAW, Thunder, Smackdown!, ECW, Jakked/Metal, and HeAt, plus PPV's sometimes three times a month. If WWE ever wants to get over that hump and get the next boom period going, then three hour RAW's should be the furthest thing from their minds.
|
|
|
Post by Sam Hain on Jul 7, 2007 1:30:04 GMT -5
It's a horrible idea. The market is already too flooded with their product.
|
|
|
Post by mexicooldude on Jul 7, 2007 4:51:26 GMT -5
it would give more tv time for wrestlers we dont see often but saying that ecw needs another half and hour or a hour because they have some wrestlers they dont always use like balls,thorn,nunzio.
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Jul 7, 2007 6:36:04 GMT -5
End the brand split, scrap Smackdown, have 3 hours of RAW on Monday Night, then one hour of ECW on a Thursday Night.
|
|