|
Post by havak on Jul 9, 2007 8:57:48 GMT -5
I've always preferred Raw, but I'm drifting over to Smackdown now. My favourite wrestler is of course Kane, so I tend to tune into the show that features him more. Raw is still good with many main eventers, but I do prefer Smackdown. I think ECW should be scrapped, it sucks. It's in no way more extreme than Raw or Smackdown, so it totally defeats the purpose of it. Get rid of ECW, get Punk, Burke, Alpha Male and the rest of the talent on other shows. Or get more talent on ECW, make it longer and have more than one title ._.
Hardcore title should make a return? European title possibly.. Or just something new.
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Jul 9, 2007 9:15:56 GMT -5
RAW, closely followed by ECW.
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jul 9, 2007 9:17:43 GMT -5
ECW because it has some good matches and CM Punk. Plus, it doesnt have enough time to suck like the others. Raw sucks and the only reason I watch is for Orton. And Smackdown....im not even gonna get into that.
|
|
|
Post by The 'Rated R Superstar' Edge on Jul 9, 2007 9:23:08 GMT -5
Smackdown, always have found it more exciting and lively lol.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 9, 2007 11:23:56 GMT -5
1. RAW 2. ECW 3. SmackDown!
|
|
y2josh
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Gold Ranger Power.
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,229
|
Post by y2josh on Jul 9, 2007 12:27:37 GMT -5
ECW for 4 simple words....Johnny Nitro Is Champ.
|
|
Nitro
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 29, 2006 18:50:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by Nitro on Jul 9, 2007 14:31:15 GMT -5
RAW was the first show it has always been the best
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jul 9, 2007 14:44:18 GMT -5
Smackdown has Undertaker, Paul Burchill, and Edge... Smackdown > ECW and RAW
|
|
Danny
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 2, 2006 13:46:27 GMT -5
Posts: 3,718
|
Post by Danny on Jul 9, 2007 14:56:32 GMT -5
Raw- Kennedy and Triple H. Smackdown- Edge. ECW- Punk.
I picked Raw.
|
|
noir
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 20, 2007 6:53:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,278
|
Post by noir on Jul 9, 2007 15:11:32 GMT -5
RAW: + Good storylines + Cena, Super Crazy, Carlito, Kennedy, Jeff.. amazing roster really, tons of variety Smackdown!: + Matt Hardy, Shannon Moore - Taped - Only 2 superstars who I'd consider myself a 'fan' of - Boring storylines ECW: + Nitro, CM Punk.. two of my favourites if not my top favourites - Only 1hr long - Boring storylines My vote: RAW followed by ECW then Smackdown!
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jul 9, 2007 15:27:23 GMT -5
RAW is my favorite brand. It is live, it has the bigger main eventers and RAW has been the main, longest lasting WWE show in the history of the company.
Smackdown is treated as a lesser show, Smackdown does not have main eventers with the name value, with the exception of the Undertaker. Edge, while very entertaining is NOT World Title material, and Batista is a complete disaster in the ring, although they bill him a a main eventer, in my opinion he is far from one.
ECW is a joke, it has the feel of a minor league baseball team. ECW has NO names, and for a brand which claims to be "extreme" they do not have any extreme rules matches or do anything that sets them apart from any of the other three brands except for the fact that they have nobody with any main event status. When they originally brought back ECW, they had such potential to make the brand good, and for the first several weeks when every match was no DQ and the ECW originals were the focus, it was very entertaining, but since Bobby Lashley won the title at December to Dismember, it has been nothing but Sunday Night Heat under a different name.
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jul 9, 2007 16:05:56 GMT -5
Edge, while very entertaining is NOT World Title material Umm, Edge is 'World Title material' in every sense of the phrase. Years worth of experience? Check. Numerous titles held? Check. History of great matches? Check. Great workrate? Check. Great mic skills? Check. Look of a Champion? Check. Excellent Heel? Check... but here it comes... Roided up? OMGodzzzerZ, not world champyunship material!!!111
|
|
|
Post by christian2 on Jul 9, 2007 16:12:53 GMT -5
It's between Smackdown and ECW for me, ECW has the up and comers like Burke, Thorn, Punk, Monty Brown and Nitro. Smackdown has the better technical Wrestlers and like others have mentioned, it's less bogged down by story lines and has more Wrestling, yet still has quality promos cut by those who are good at them, ie. Edge.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jul 9, 2007 17:48:34 GMT -5
Edge, while very entertaining is NOT World Title material Umm, Edge is 'World Title material' in every sense of the phrase. Years worth of experience? Check. Numerous titles held? Check. History of great matches? Check. Great workrate? Check. Great mic skills? Check. Look of a Champion? Check. Excellent Heel? Check... but here it comes... Roided up? OMGodzzzerZ, not world champyunship material!!!111 Yeah, all of that stuff is all well and good, but I judge wrestling based on what I would actually BELIEVE when I watch it. He's smaller than Undertaker, he's smaller than Batista.....he shouldn't beat those guys. I don't buy smaller wrestlers beating bigger wrestlers. Thats why we have the Intercontinental and United States Championships. WWE did the wrong thing by pushing Edge and Orton and Mysterio into the World Title picture, because now it's too crowded and lower tier belts (IC, US) have become absolute jokes. If you took HALF of the people fighting over the WWE title on RAW and had them in the Intercontinental title division, then we wouldn't have people like Umaga and Santino ruining the IC belt....not every PPV needs to be an 8-man match for the WWE title......the title picture is TOO crowded, not that many people should be going for the belt at one time. Smackdown is a better show for Edge because they have smaller wrestlers, but Edge is a heel, and as champion he needs a strong babyface to go against....and Smackdown doesn't have any. I don't buy Batista vs Edge for the world title. They need to either put Triple H or Shawn Michaels on Smackdown when they comeback, because Smackdown needs a NAME and they need a name with TALENT. Because Edge can't be a heel if the fans don't have a babyface to get behind, and right now nobody cares about Batista.
|
|
|
Post by BigDaddyChacon on Jul 9, 2007 18:06:19 GMT -5
Smackdown is still the superior show no matter what anybody else says or thinks. Thanks for reading.
|
|
|
Post by oscar on Jul 9, 2007 18:30:33 GMT -5
Raw because of the superstars and matches though it would be better with out Cena as champ
|
|
capncharisma
Main Eventer
Because they are Nexus, and they're AWESOME!
Joined on: Jul 6, 2005 0:11:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,264
|
Post by capncharisma on Jul 9, 2007 18:43:39 GMT -5
smackdown - better wrestling and edge then ecw for better wrestling and finally raw...though it has the star power, lashley and cena are too over for booker, orton or kennedy to get a title run
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Jul 9, 2007 18:46:05 GMT -5
RAW-Most Talent.
|
|