|
|
Post by Johnny on Aug 24, 2007 20:29:56 GMT -5
Since in my other post peopl were saying both ways I wanna know how everbody feels. Personally I am going with Matt.
|
|
|
|
Post by brandon20 on Aug 24, 2007 20:31:41 GMT -5
matt hardy all the way......MVP is just for alll the kids here that are new wrestling fans that dont kno shhit about WRESTLING
|
|
|
|
Post by Lemon-Aid on Aug 24, 2007 20:32:41 GMT -5
MVP, of course. Matt's good but lacks on the mic a bit, whereas MVP is very talented on the mic.
So, MVP > Matt Hardy.
|
|
Mushroom Stomp
Main Eventer
Crazy Frog Bros Fa' Life
Joined on: Apr 15, 2007 18:41:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,376
|
Post by Mushroom Stomp on Aug 24, 2007 20:33:29 GMT -5
who i think WILL win,MVP
Who DESERVES to win is Matt Hardy all the way
Mvps not good,he really needs to learn how to entertain,he puts on the worst match of the night,also matt hardys been in wwe for almost 10 years now,its about time for him to win something
|
|
|
|
Post by brandon20 on Aug 24, 2007 20:36:13 GMT -5
MVP, of course. Matt's good but lacks on the mic a bit, whereas MVP is very talented on the mic. So, MVP > Matt Hardy. is that all you ppl care about???? IF THEY CAN ACT?? what happen to IF THEY CAN WRESTLE??? |
|
|
|
Post by Lemon-Aid on Aug 24, 2007 20:38:48 GMT -5
MVP, of course. Matt's good but lacks on the mic a bit, whereas MVP is very talented on the mic. So, MVP > Matt Hardy. is that all you ppl care about?  if they can act? what happen to WRESTLING??? Well the poll asked for the better all-round superstar. Now Matt's good in the ring, probably a little better than MVP, but the better all-rounder is definatley MVP. |
|
JoeyBats
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 25, 2007 19:14:50 GMT -5
Posts: 1,885
|
Post by JoeyBats on Aug 24, 2007 20:39:56 GMT -5
MVP.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Aug 24, 2007 20:42:36 GMT -5
MVP by far. He has the look, the gimmick, the attitude, the mic skills, the in ring skills, and the charisma to go to the top one day. Hardy has none of those.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lemon-Aid on Aug 24, 2007 20:42:56 GMT -5
Well the poll asked for the better all-round superstar. Now Matt's good in the ring, probably a little better than MVP, but the better all-rounder is definatley MVP. the poll doesnt say for the better All-round superstar Yes it does. |
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Aug 24, 2007 20:43:36 GMT -5
Well the poll asked for the better all-round superstar. Now Matt's good in the ring, probably a little better than MVP, but the better all-rounder is definatley MVP. the poll doesnt say for the better All-round superstar And yes...it does... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 10:58:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2007 20:46:00 GMT -5
matt hardy all the way......MVP is just for alll the kids here that are new wrestling fans that dont kno shhit about WRESTLING What I posted in the other thread: Im a MVP fan and Ive been watching for a long ass time. The guy has talent and is progressing nicely. Matt Hardy has busted his ass for years granted, but at this time MVP puts on more entertaing matches than he does. Only Matt matches Ive really enjoyed this year have either contained a ladder or MVP. MVP on the others hands has had many great matches this year including his PPV matches against Professor Dickweed and Matt. Face it MVP has a future while Matt will never be above the midcard |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 10:58:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2007 20:54:52 GMT -5
MVP. He has the awesome heel gimmick going, can wrestle, good on the mic, everything. Now Im not putting Hardy down. Hardy can wrestle but he mic skills arent to par
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtydeeds on Aug 24, 2007 21:05:57 GMT -5
matt hardy all the way......MVP is just for alll the kids here that are new wrestling fans that dont kno shhit about WRESTLING if u said that infront of my face i would shove my hand up your ass and stretch every muscle You dont know crap about Wrestling either, you would know MVP has the look, Talent, in-ring skills, Gimmick, he's got the whole damn package, Matt Hardy has got nothing, Mic Skills are no good, he lets people carry him in his matches and once he does the TOF its over, that aint good in-ring skills IMO i may only be 14 and a half years old but i know a good wrestler when i see one and matt hardy does not impress me And before you come up with the ''Your 14 how would you know what wrestlers were good'' - i have watched tapes from over the years from Dynamite Kid to Hulk Hogan to Steve Austin, i am in wrestling school myself and they give you videos to take home and study, So Mister you know nothing about wrestling if you think MVP is not talented |
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Aug 24, 2007 21:09:16 GMT -5
MVP will probably be disqualified for attempted kidnapping.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 10:58:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2007 21:10:45 GMT -5
matt hardy all the way......MVP is just for alll the kids here that are new wrestling fans that dont kno shhit about WRESTLING if u said that infront of my face i would shove my hand up your ass and stretch every muscle You dont know **** about Wrestling either, you would know MVP has the look, Talent, in-ring skills, Gimmick, he's got the whole damn package, Matt Hardy has got nothing, Mic Skills are no good, he lets people carry him in his matches and once he does the TOF its over, that aint good in-ring skills IMO i may only be 14 and a half years old but i know a good wrestler when i see one and matt hardy does not impress me And before you come up with the ''Your 14 how would you know what wrestlers were good'' - i have watched tapes from over the years from Dynamite Kid to Hulk Hogan to Steve Austin, i am in wrestling school myself and they give you videos to take home and study, So Mister you know nothing about wrestling if you think MVP is not talented As much as I agree with so of what you are saying, Donkey Punching a dude is not the way to go |
|
|
|
Post by Mr.GT on Aug 24, 2007 21:10:54 GMT -5
MVP. Better on the mic, Great gimmick, Better Wrestler, And Great Charisma.
Matt Hardy= Mid-card 4 Life!
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtydeeds on Aug 24, 2007 21:14:13 GMT -5
MVP will probably be disqualified for attempted kidnapping. You have failed to make me giggle |
|
|
|
Post by Nick Papagiorgio on Aug 24, 2007 21:20:17 GMT -5
MVP. Better on the mic, Great gimmick, Better Wrestler, And Great Charisma. Matt Hardy= Mid-card 4 Life! Matt Hardy had better matches the MVP, Ladder Matches, TLC Matches, Cage Matches, to name a few |
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Aug 24, 2007 21:22:16 GMT -5
MVP will probably be disqualified for attempted kidnapping. You have failed to make me giggle As you shouldn't. Felonies are no laughing matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Aug 24, 2007 21:25:27 GMT -5
Matt Hardy deserves to win the US title because he can wrestle which is why I chose Matt Hardy. However I would probably change my mind If I would have ever seen anything other than a promo. I think if MVP can wrestle as good as everyone says then I would probably say hh should be world champion.
P.S. am I the only one who likes Matt Hardy's promos. He is not my favorite on the mic though I would say Mr. Kennedy is mine I like MVP's better though.
|
|
