|
|
Post by class316 on Nov 8, 2007 8:46:40 GMT -5
Torrie is a survivor. She’s one of the only ex WCW/ECW that came during the alliance era in 2001 that is still employed by WWE!! Who else is left? Dreamer and Charles Robinson and I think that's it. Richards doesn't count cause he was hired in 1999.
|
|
acr93
Main Eventer
WF's #1 Widow's Peak Freak!
Joined on: Aug 7, 2007 16:03:51 GMT -5
Posts: 2,110
|
Post by acr93 on Nov 8, 2007 22:52:11 GMT -5
Didn't victoria just sign a 4 year contract a few months back? can she even be considered someone that the wwe will let go with this contract? shes the best WRESTLING diva in the wwe right now, and my second favorite diva of all time. if she was let go, i would seriously consider to stop watching wrestling. also, jillian is a great wrestler and it would be stupid to let her go. i just want wwe to let go of the non wrestling sluts aka ashely, layla, kelly  ing kelly, and maria. i'm on the fence with torrie... i don't really like her, but shes not terrible, but shes not good either. and i can actually see mickie james being released. just because wwe is and has been making bad decisions. but thats ok. anyone diva that gets released will probably just go to TNA anyways. |
|
|
|
Post by Artistix on Nov 10, 2007 23:38:01 GMT -5
Safe:
Mickie
Melina
Beth
Candice
Maria
Torrie - I can't see them firing Torrie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cass on Nov 10, 2007 23:41:24 GMT -5
Torrie is a survivor. She’s one of the only ex WCW/ECW that came during the alliance era in 2001 that is still employed by WWE!! Who else is left? Dreamer and Charles Robinson and I think that's it. Richards doesn't count cause he was hired in 1999. Chavo and Helms. |
|
|
|
Post by thematthardyjr on Nov 11, 2007 1:27:00 GMT -5
Torrie is a survivor. She’s one of the only ex WCW/ECW that came during the alliance era in 2001 that is still employed by WWE!! Who else is left? Dreamer and Charles Robinson and I think that's it. Richards doesn't count cause he was hired in 1999. Chavo and Helms. Shannon Moore |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Nov 11, 2007 5:52:02 GMT -5
Moore was released in 2005 and came back. Even had a brief stint in TNA. |
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Nov 11, 2007 9:32:02 GMT -5
Layla is the only one I'd keep. She's got a different look to her and I find her appealing.
|
|
|
|
Post by maryselover12 on Dec 2, 2007 16:47:58 GMT -5
Layla is the only one I'd keep. She's got a different look to her and I find her appealing. She has horrible mic skills and is a bad wrestler,she needs to just stick to being a manager to The Miz!! |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Dec 2, 2007 17:26:22 GMT -5
I don't know what to say, other than.
"lame 50's gimmick", just like Kevin Thorn had a vampire gimmick?
WWE at times can be short-minded, but you are giving them ammo. It's obvious to me, much like Thorn, they are followers. They support the life style if you can call it that.
It is 2007, but you obviously can only go on what WWE has given you. Check around for them in OVW, it'll break some new ground.
They are not lame and they are greasers, not three goofballs who think they are from the 50's.
Oh and point of interest, greasers did exist after 1950. Ugh, it's such a waste of breath in how you summed up Deuce and Domino.
|
|
|
|
Post by James St. James on Dec 2, 2007 18:22:41 GMT -5
Regardless of how I summed them up, Cherry is still scenery, just like the car. That was the bigger point I was trying to make. I'm sure they could still "support the lifestyle" without Cherry, and she isn't doing anything to get them over or making them any more interesting.
And I'm sorry, but I shouldn't have to check out OVW to find out why they are good.........they should be showing me why they are on Smackdown.
|
|
bobski.
Main Eventer
...
Joined on: Feb 4, 2007 13:40:53 GMT -5
Posts: 1,751
|
Post by bobski. on Dec 2, 2007 18:24:17 GMT -5
Keep the divas, they have nice feet
|
|
|
|
Post by jack on Dec 2, 2007 18:44:21 GMT -5
"Oh sorry, I lost my concentration I was looking...at your..targets!?!?!?!"
|
|
|
|
Post by kidkazi on Dec 2, 2007 18:44:54 GMT -5
Targets? Is that what the kids are calling them nowadays? LMAO, thats greatness |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Dec 2, 2007 19:12:15 GMT -5
Regardless of how I summed them up, Cherry is still scenery, just like the car. That was the bigger point I was trying to make. I'm sure they could still "support the lifestyle" without Cherry, and she isn't doing anything to get them over or making them any more interesting. And I'm sorry, but I shouldn't have to check out OVW to find out why they are good.........they should be showing me why they are on Smackdown. How funny... you used the word, targets, yet managed to miss my point • I wasn't referring to Cherry in any way, not even in the least. • "the lifestyle" you took almost purposely out of context. Life style would be much akin to how Murdoch & Cade are portrayed, or better yet how Candice was portrayed for 96% of her career. Life style is any way of living that is different from yours or mine- She's no where on the radar of my comment. • Yeah, right after they a McMahon. I mean, really... you think every thing brought up to WWE is left as is? HA You have no ground for |
|
