|
Post by taker1 on Aug 9, 2007 15:10:52 GMT -5
I really enjoyed WM22 the most out of any Wrestlemania. 21 was awful, and 23 was just decent. Overall, the last 3 years of 'Mania have been kind of dissapointing. Which one of the 3 did you like most?
22 was all-around great. MITB was awesome, as was Foley/Edge. HBK/Vince was entertaining. JBL/Benoit put on a very good, underrated match. The Smackdown main event was kind of short, but very good taking away the time. Trish/Mickie was the best WM divas match ever. and the main event was just epic. not a very good match, but the crowd was electrifying.
|
|
|
Post by wwf123 on Aug 9, 2007 15:16:27 GMT -5
WM23 was actually exciting compared to the other ones
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Aug 9, 2007 15:17:56 GMT -5
Definitely 21. I didn't enjoy 22 or 23.
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Aug 9, 2007 15:18:07 GMT -5
23 and 21 sucked, I liked 22, so my answer is obvious.
|
|
|
Post by cjd15 on Aug 9, 2007 15:19:09 GMT -5
I was at 22 and 23 live but I liked 22 most prolly cause it was my first Wrestlemania and PPV.
|
|
|
Post by mal on Aug 9, 2007 15:19:45 GMT -5
22.
|
|
|
Post by Stevo on Aug 9, 2007 15:25:14 GMT -5
Ugh, I hated 22. Worst MITB match yet, poor main events, and what, 2 stand-out matches in Edge/Foley and Trish/Mickie?
23 was okay, basically seemed like WM12, except 11 years later. A good opener, but it went a little too long, some random/unimpressive mid-card matches, and a main event that took half an hour to get good.
21 wasn't great either, but there was a good MITB match, an epic match with Angle and Michaels, Stone Cold and Piper were pretty entertaining, and Batista/Triple H was a good main event. The only problem was how dead the crowd was.
Honestly, all three were nothing special. I find it odd that the same happened over 10 years ago, with Wrestlemania X being great but 11, 12, and 13 all having some big flaws. I'll go with 21, but I'd rather watch 17-20 instead.
|
|
|
Post by embalmer on Aug 9, 2007 15:27:32 GMT -5
None to be honest, I think they've all been terrible for what they're intended for.....WRESTLEMANIA.
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Aug 9, 2007 15:28:33 GMT -5
23 for sure. 21 was awesome as well. 22 didn't even feel like a WM until the main event.
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Aug 9, 2007 16:09:14 GMT -5
23.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 18:06:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 16:13:11 GMT -5
I honesly don't see why everyone hates 21. It was pretty decent. I mean you had great matches in Rey/Eddie and HBK/Angle. Triple H/Batista wasnt too bad. MITB kicked ass. Orton/Taker wasnt bad. I thought 22 was twice as bad. As mentioned Edge/Foley and Mickie/Trish were the only stand out matches. But my pick is 23, the main reason being Undertaker defeating Batista
|
|
|
Post by degenerationxrules on Aug 9, 2007 16:48:13 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 22 & 23 was great
|
|
|
Post by MondayRaw on Aug 9, 2007 16:49:41 GMT -5
I was at 23, so it gets my vote
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 18:06:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 16:50:10 GMT -5
WM22. It had Edge vs. Foley.
|
|
vivalaraza1331
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 3, 2006 9:48:08 GMT -5
Posts: 1,001
|
Post by vivalaraza1331 on Aug 9, 2007 16:56:33 GMT -5
I'm not going to use the "I was there" argument, although it's and easy explanation, but I'll say Wrestlemania 22 for a very different reason. Wrestlemania 22 saw people the majority of the internet wrestling fans actually WANTED to see win. Mysterio finally got his moment in the spotlight, RVD "climbed the ladder to success" (yeah, I know), Edge was made to look like a huge star thanks to Foley, Mickie James picked up her first Women's Championship, and whether you like him or hate him, Cena beating Triple H was the right thing to do. The show was booked very well--with the exception of the World Tag Team Championship match--and different stars went over. Wrestlemania 21 had too much non-wrestling extra-curricular activites going on to truly be a GREAT show and Wrestlemania 23, in my opinion, was only decent.
|
|
|
Post by BigShab421 on Aug 9, 2007 17:04:08 GMT -5
I was at 23, so it gets my vote.
Plus it was an awesome show even watching it on DVD.
|
|
|
Post by timebombversion420 on Aug 9, 2007 17:12:29 GMT -5
WM21
|
|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on Aug 9, 2007 17:18:51 GMT -5
Twenty Three
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Aug 9, 2007 17:41:51 GMT -5
23.
|
|
|
Post by Lemon-Aid on Aug 9, 2007 18:24:59 GMT -5
23.
|
|