|
|
Post by theeggman on Aug 9, 2007 21:29:50 GMT -5
What is your view on paul london and brian kendrick?
|
|
W¡LDCARD
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Sell me your TNA figures!
Joined on: Mar 23, 2005 3:32:51 GMT -5
Posts: 3,444
|
Post by W¡LDCARD on Aug 9, 2007 21:32:07 GMT -5
I used to look forward to watching their tag matches on SD!, but on RAW, they're nothing but an afterthought. They should be used much better than they are now.
|
|
|
|
Post by mal on Aug 9, 2007 21:32:31 GMT -5
WWE - London > Kendrick
Everywhere else...
Kendrick < London
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 16:23:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 22:29:59 GMT -5
Im gonna have to say, over all they are very awesome. I am a big fan of all of their ring work. However, with limited moves in WWE today they sometimes are not nearly as good as they can be. And sometimes here on the internet they can be overated.
|
|
|
|
Post by iggy on Aug 9, 2007 22:31:34 GMT -5
They are a good tag team but it sucks with all the limitations the WWE puts on thier move sets but It's a refreshing tag team to have instead of the typical Duece & Domino, MNM Etc.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 16:23:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 22:46:01 GMT -5
I love Londrick. They have alot of talent and are underused. Given the chance they probably couldve save Raws Tag Team Divison instead of wrestling on HEAT
|
|
JoeyBats
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 25, 2007 19:14:50 GMT -5
Posts: 1,885
|
Post by JoeyBats on Aug 9, 2007 22:54:24 GMT -5
London and Kendrick are pretty cool. Whenver someone says paul London I always go back to that sick 2005 Royal Rumble bump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Aug 10, 2007 0:40:09 GMT -5
I like them a lot, I wish they were used better but whatever. They cant beat the Machine Guns.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Aug 10, 2007 4:06:10 GMT -5
Both are cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lemon-Aid on Aug 10, 2007 10:14:17 GMT -5
I like both of them. They make a great tag-team in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by noneshallpass on Aug 10, 2007 10:29:01 GMT -5
I like them, but London seems to rush too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by wwe4ever on Aug 10, 2007 10:32:31 GMT -5
I think they're awesome wrestlers. A very good tag team. They remind me of a modern day Rockers tag team.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 16:23:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2007 10:46:11 GMT -5
I think London and Kendrick are aweomse, w/o a doubt. There always full of energy and the crowd really feeds off of their high flying style. WWE do yourself a favor and take the titles of those two jabroni's Cade and Murdoch and give them to The Hooliganz!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 16:23:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2007 10:51:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Aug 10, 2007 11:00:11 GMT -5
Paul London's beard rocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by theeggman on Aug 10, 2007 11:00:56 GMT -5
these two would benefit from a move to TNA. They would be full appreciated there for their true abilities. Plus, imagine, Kendrick & London vs. The Motor City Machine Guns  Oh yeah. But the problem is, TNA's tag division is  ed up worse than all of WWEs and also, that match would only be a three minute spot festival on Impact. Now, if it were a PPV itd be a different story. |
|
|
|
Post by degenerationxrules on Aug 10, 2007 11:39:05 GMT -5
they are my favorite tag team today. htey should wrestle more
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Aug 10, 2007 22:07:22 GMT -5
I like them as a team but they are a tad over rated. They're easily the best tag team in the WWE but they really arent as great as some say they are as far as im concerned.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr.GT on Aug 10, 2007 22:12:39 GMT -5
Overrated ***CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP***.
|
|
|
|
Post by timebombversion420 on Aug 10, 2007 22:16:28 GMT -5
their both awesome Im not sure why they were moved to Raw because there not used that much , atleast on Smackdown they could go for the tag titles on there
|
|
