|
Post by randyorton9 on Aug 20, 2007 4:12:51 GMT -5
I thought i would just name this lot i no there is a lot more but i just had to include John Cena.
And i voted for John Cena because he has held that title for to long and he has hardly got any moves!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Aug 20, 2007 4:22:23 GMT -5
Regardless if it was in WWE or not,
David Arquette has to be your winner.
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Aug 20, 2007 4:41:29 GMT -5
sorry, randyorton9, I voted Orton as he only held the title for less than a month. I'm impressed after 2 months
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Aug 20, 2007 4:56:22 GMT -5
the two people that have voted for cena dont have a clue about wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by hammerhead on Aug 20, 2007 4:57:54 GMT -5
Andre The Giant had the belt for about 30 seconds before handing it over to Ted Dibiase. He gets my vote.
|
|
|
Post by randyorton9 on Aug 20, 2007 5:01:48 GMT -5
the two people that have voted for cena dont have a clue about wrestling. You do know its for the WORST champion ever u no. And why dont i have a clue about wrestling???
|
|
UFW.222
Main Eventer
12 refs and counting!!!
Joined on: May 15, 2007 10:04:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,519
|
Post by UFW.222 on Aug 20, 2007 5:11:19 GMT -5
defo cena what a twat.
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Aug 20, 2007 5:17:13 GMT -5
the two people that have voted for cena dont have a clue about wrestling. You do know its for the WORST champion ever u no. And why dont i have a clue about wrestling??? Dude, that is your criteria for worst champion; long title reign and minimal moves? I'm sorry but those are some pretty bad traits for evaulating champions. I feel John has been doing a good job as WWE Champion. the two people that have voted for cena dont have a clue about wrestling. I'm glad someone else is thinking along the same lines as I am. In terms of the worst champion it would have to be either Andre the Giant, Kane, or Tommy Rich. All three men held their respective belts for very short time frames (Andre - 30 sec, Kane - 24 hours, Tommy Rich - 5 days) and the way they all won the belts is somewhat tainted. I would've said David Arquette but I've since learned that he donated his earnings for WCW to charitable cause and several are wrestling family related. Now to me his on-screen title reign sucked, but the heart in the person made up for it.
|
|
Fury
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 21:19:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,257
|
Post by Fury on Aug 20, 2007 5:18:32 GMT -5
There is no way Cena is the worst Champion in history.
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Aug 20, 2007 5:55:49 GMT -5
Why isn't Mysterio on the list?
I didn't enjoy his run as World Champion at all.
|
|
|
Post by Lego Customs! on Aug 20, 2007 6:13:19 GMT -5
Now Cena might only have 4 moves.. but Khali only has 1, so my vote goes to him.
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Aug 20, 2007 6:19:07 GMT -5
Another thing is why is Kahli even on the list? He's been champion for what a few weeks? His nomination should be voided out.
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Aug 20, 2007 6:19:37 GMT -5
Wrestling isnt just about 'moves'. Its also about playing to the crowd, listening to them, selling, pyschology and so on. I would say cena does that pretty well.
|
|
|
Post by moogie101 on Aug 20, 2007 6:26:47 GMT -5
I'd say Sgt Slaughter myself. His matches were terrible during that era & I recall a headline series of defences against Jim Duggan & you lot are moaning about Cena? Cena is no Bernoit but he's getting better, hell I really enjoyed his match with Bobby Lashley.
|
|
SystemofaDan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 17, 2006 11:42:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,397
|
Post by SystemofaDan on Aug 20, 2007 7:06:04 GMT -5
All of them listed have been good champions but i voted for Cena as his has been far to long
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Aug 20, 2007 7:06:48 GMT -5
All of them listed have been good champions but i voted for Cena as his has been far to long eurgh
|
|
|
Post by ultimatethey on Aug 20, 2007 7:19:22 GMT -5
Cena and Khali i am even unsure how they even got in the WWE.
|
|
|
Post by moogie101 on Aug 20, 2007 7:53:24 GMT -5
Cena and Khali i am even unsure how they even got in the WWE. Mate I'm not having a pop but WTF? Khali is in the WWE because he's freaking huge & Vince has always been behind pushing guys that are larger than life. Khali despite an obvious lack of inring talent has a lot going for him purely based on his size. Cena however whilst not being Malenko has improved greatly in the ring, hell I really got into his PPV with with lashley. He has a great look, is incredibly marketable & despite net marks is still incredibly popular. People need to remember there is more to being World champion than technical ability
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Aug 20, 2007 7:58:11 GMT -5
Khali. The man's terrible.
|
|
|
Post by theeggman on Aug 20, 2007 8:03:57 GMT -5
Benoit. That monster did not deserve the title. He deserved to job on heat and wrestle dark matches. And get huge defeatd.
|
|