|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Jan 7, 2008 12:53:52 GMT -5
'Taker wins the Rumble or I riot.
|
|
XtremeSlim
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Sept 26, 2004 14:54:50 GMT -5
Posts: 228
|
Post by XtremeSlim on Jan 7, 2008 12:56:41 GMT -5
Should I stick with my seats in Sec 314 Row L or Sec 346 Row C?
|
|
|
Post by ovw4life on Jan 7, 2008 16:47:49 GMT -5
Don't know if posted before, but, Yang, Moore, Holly, Snitsky, Umaga, Miz, & Morrison have qualified for the Rumble
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Jan 7, 2008 18:49:17 GMT -5
Yeah it has been posted, and Moore/Yang qualifiers were revoked when Morrison & Miz beat them.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 7, 2008 19:00:03 GMT -5
Don't know if posted before, but, Yang, Moore, Holly, Snitsky, Umaga, Miz, & Morrison have qualified for the Rumble According to WWE.com (specifically this page), Yang and Moore have not qualified.
|
|
Get A Rhythm™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 25, 2007 4:17:23 GMT -5
Posts: 2,120
|
Post by Get A Rhythm™ on Jan 8, 2008 15:19:51 GMT -5
Should I stick with my seats in Sec 314 Row L or Sec 346 Row C? 346 Row C: Pros: 1.) You get a great view for the Royal Rumble match being able to see all sides of the ring. 2.) You're sitting on the side of the arena that is behind the announcers, so any activity that goes on there, like if someone goes through the announce table, you will have a better view of it. 3.) Row C (3) is better than Row L (12) Cons: 1.) Lousy view of the entrance 314 Row L: Pros: 1.) Clear shot of the entrance 2.) You will be able to see all sides of the ring fairly easily, which is good for the Rumble match Cons: 1.) Row 12 --------------------- I'd go with 346 Row C
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Jan 8, 2008 21:29:21 GMT -5
Batista and Undertaker are in the Royal Rumble, confirmed on RAW.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 22, 2024 17:35:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2008 15:19:09 GMT -5
I have to say, this ppv looks really solid. As long as they don't go and add some random matches to it.
Jericho/JBL could be very good Flair/MVP could be very good Edge/Mysterio could be great Orton/Hardy could be very good
And the rumble matches are always exciting
|
|
|
Post by layzie on Jan 9, 2008 15:32:11 GMT -5
all the matches interest me, and the rumble is the rumble. man, as the days draw nearer, i widh more and more that i could be home to go to it (i leave for coll the week before)
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Jan 9, 2008 19:51:45 GMT -5
WWE.com just announced thate Kane has been add Rumble match. So now Kane has been apperance every Rumble since his debut!
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Jan 9, 2008 20:40:48 GMT -5
I know the main entree is the Rumble and it usually delivers a good show, but I need some more side dishes.
Four one on one matches, none of which are gimmick related with the exception of Flair's career being on the line which is every match he wrestles in.
Up the ante a little bit would ya? When's the last time the tag belts meant something? Or how about Hardy's IC run where he rarely had it one the line? The Diva matches are becoming more stagnant with no direction to take it.
This is one of their best PPV names they have and right now I'm not impressed with the bill and the matches are not exciting me in the least.
They still have time, but this is an opportunity to reel in the more casual fans and right now a big wrestling fan(ME) is thinking about passing on this event and that's a problem.
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Jan 9, 2008 21:43:49 GMT -5
Four one on one matches, none of which are gimmick related Why do people always need gimmick matches? I remember that was a frequent complaint made by many people leading up to Armageddon last month; that it lacked gimmick matches. Not every event needs gimmick matches. Not every event needs even one gimmick match. It's the Royal Rumble for 's sake. There was a gimmick-filled Raw two days ago, and there's going to be an Elimination Chamber at No Way Out. The Royal Rumble card is shaping up just fine without giving us a gimmick overdose. I think it looks like a fun card the way it is.
|
|
|
Post by thestartofnewera on Jan 10, 2008 5:25:37 GMT -5
Hello to all you wrestling fans out there. We are only 3 weeks away from the Royal Rumble. Who do you all think is going to win the Royal Rumble match? I am going to say...
1. Batista I hope not I just got this funny feeling he will
2. Bobbly Lashley if he returns at the Rumble
3. Triple H I really hope he wins
|
|
|
Post by brethitmanhart on Jan 10, 2008 15:02:21 GMT -5
Who do you think will enter number one this year?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 22, 2024 17:35:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2008 16:07:08 GMT -5
Who do you think will enter number one this year? #1- Snitsky #2- Hornswoggle
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Jan 10, 2008 17:29:05 GMT -5
^ Edge and Chavo ME Mania... ROFL Actually the Raw match would ME since Smackdown hasn't gotten it since 2003. and Triple H needs to be in the main event when he wins his precious title back.
|
|
|
Post by cenaroxorz123 on Jan 11, 2008 18:39:06 GMT -5
If Jeff Hardy wins the WWE title, a LOT of people are going to have cut their penis off or delete their account.
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Jan 11, 2008 19:13:03 GMT -5
If Undertaker wins the rumble, I'm not ordering Wrestlemania
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Jan 11, 2008 19:18:57 GMT -5
I'm psyched! I'll be in Section 111 row C. The card is very solid. I've never been to a Rumble before so it should be incredible!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 22, 2024 17:35:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2008 20:59:36 GMT -5
My guess is 'Taker takes it 2 years in a row.
i can just see it happening.
|
|