|
Post by micromaker on Feb 9, 2006 19:55:27 GMT -5
I just saw when a stranger calls, it was decent, but basicly the entire movie is the girl walking around the house, then the phone rings she picks it up and you hear the guy breath, then she hangs up and walks around the house slowly opening doors and it just gets really repeative and kinda boring, it wasint scary at all imo, and the only part that was a surprise was the ending but i wont spoil it
anyone else see this movie?
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Feb 10, 2006 9:35:04 GMT -5
See No Evil makes me laugh when I watch it.
I'm pretty sure that's not what they were going for.
|
|
Tyler Durden
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 21, 2001 18:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 3,111
|
Post by Tyler Durden on Feb 10, 2006 11:52:29 GMT -5
yes i'm not sure that was the intended purpose either. But come on, as soon as you see Kane on the big screen, you laugh, its only natural.
I'm heading off to Florida for a week either tonight or tommorow night (depending on when the snows supposed to hit hard) so I won't be posting much here for the next week if at all. I'm gonna have my laptop with me, so I may, but who knows. Dont let this slip off page one!
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Feb 10, 2006 23:52:57 GMT -5
I just got back from Final Destination 3 and I was kind of let down by the ending mostly. But the rest of the movie was freakin' awesome! The kills were very cool and clever. The story was the same, as in all of the Final Destination films but the kills were very cool. The theatre was nearly empty though for a opening night showing. I give Final Destination 3 a rating of 8/10. The ending was just one big blur and it doesnt look like a sequel opener. i wont spoil anything. Heres how I rate the Final Destination films in order from best to "mediocre"
1. Final Destination 2 2. Final Destination 3 3. Final Destination
Final Destination 2 is still the best out of all of the three so far IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Deano on Feb 11, 2006 7:29:09 GMT -5
Cool dude, gotta check that out next week. I agree that the 2nd is better than the first, but only by a small margain.
Anyways, I was just looking through Bloody Disgusting for the first time in quite a while, and found Wes Cravens interview where he mentions a possible Michael Myers vs Freddy vs Jason. Anyone else heard anything about this? To tell the truth, I dont think a triple-threat movie would work so well.
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Feb 11, 2006 10:16:30 GMT -5
A triple threat movie would SUCK.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Feb 11, 2006 10:33:33 GMT -5
from Bloody-disgusting.com
It was revealed today that New Line Cinema is working on a remake of Friday the 13th, not the earlier reported prequel, according to Fangoria. Series creator Sean Cunningham explains, "New Line is aggressively pursuing a new film.” As for who is slated to take the directorial reins, Cunningham says, “I’m flattered that [New Line] is interested, but I’m not really involved, at least not at this point.” Even though Fango is claiming that the new Jason Voorhees flick will be a remake, nothing has been officially confirmed as of yet- watch this spot for more news soon. In the original, many years after two summer camp councilers are killed at Camp Crystal Lake, the owner decides to reopen, which sparks a series of grisly murders. The murderer ends up being the mother of a camper who died because of the counslers irresponsibility
I hope like hell this doesn't happen. It's a stupid idea. The Friday the 13th series is far too iconic to be remade. I hope they just make an old school Friday the 13th film with Jason killing the crapout of people. I don't want a remake of the original.
|
|
|
Post by Official WF Ghostbuster on Feb 11, 2006 10:37:26 GMT -5
Remaking Friday the 13th would be a huge mistake. The first one is definately the best, because it had a great cast of no-names (including Kevin Bacon at the time), and a great twist ending, along with the great last second shock. To remake it would be a shame.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Feb 11, 2006 10:39:41 GMT -5
Remaking Friday the 13th would be a huge mistake. The first one is definately the best, because it had a great cast of no-names (including Kevin Bacon at the time), and a great twist ending, along with the great last second shock. To remake it would be a shame. exactly. The whole "twist" would be lost at this point because unless you live under a rock or just simply aren't a horror fan, then you know how it all turns out. I'm sure they would try to pull an even bigger swerve but in the end it would just suck. I just don't see New Line going through with this.
|
|
|
Post by Deano on Feb 11, 2006 10:59:46 GMT -5
I would like to se a prequel, but not a remake at all.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Feb 11, 2006 21:10:52 GMT -5
House of the Dead 2 is on right now on Sci Fi. I've watched the first 10 minutes of it and it's highly cheesy. Might be better to watch in a group just to have fun with it.
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Feb 11, 2006 22:36:08 GMT -5
House of the Dead 2 is on right now on Sci Fi. I've watched the first 10 minutes of it and it's highly cheesy. Might be better to watch in a group just to have fun with it. Its on already? I missed it. Oh well, when does House of the Dead 2 get released on DVD? Regarding the Friday The 13th, i think that is one movie that should not even be thought of being remade. A prequel would be cool or another Freddy vs. Jason would be cool but not a remake. Over at bloody-disgusting.com theres a link to a site which shows a gory clip from The Hills Have Eyes remake.. Heres some news that some of you might like to hear/read: 'Saw III' Making October DateAfter the passing of the legendary Gregg Hoffman, whom is one of the founders of Twisted Pictures, genre fans have been asking the question "will we still see Saw III in theaters by October 2006?" Today BD reporter Elaine Lamkin talked one-on-one with Darren Lynn Bousman, director of Saw II who not only confirmed that 'Saw III' WILL be released this October (tentatively the 27th), but that he, and Saw co-creators James Wan and Leigh Whannell will be involved in it in some capacity. More news when we post our interview with Darren soon. 'Saw II' hits DVD on February 14th, just in time for your honeys. Michael Keaton Enters the 'Grindhouse'?Although nothing has been confirmed yet, IESB received a scoop from a reader who claims they met Michael Keaton at Disneyland in California and discovered some interesting news. If you couldn't read the title above, Michael Keaton told this scooper that he will have a role in WeinsteinCo.'s Grindhouse, which will be directed by both Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriquez. He tells the scooper that he has a role specifically in Rodriquez's 60-minute zombie film entitled "Project Terror". Tarantino's section, "Death Proof," will be a slasher segment. 'Grindhouse' is aiming for a September 22nd release.Also over at Bloody-Disgusting.com Wes Craven talks about the remake of "Last House on the Left" which is rumored to be released 2007. Wes Craven said right now Hollywood or the movie companies are looking for a director to film the remake of Last House on the Left. It would be f'n awesome if Alexandre Aja (Haute Tension, Hills Have Eyes) would direct, that would kick major @$$.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 7, 2024 15:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2006 22:46:35 GMT -5
Grindhouse is going to be the coolest movie ever.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 7, 2024 15:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2006 22:59:30 GMT -5
Better Hostel DVD pic. "UNRATED! Now one more drop of blood!"
|
|
|
Post by Deano on Feb 12, 2006 13:41:47 GMT -5
Watched Wolf Creek last night. I have read a number of reviews about it before, some saying itwas great, and some saying that it sucked, but to tell the truth, I really enjoyed this film. The psychopath wasnt worth all the hype, as he was just a typical murderer, but he was ing evil at times. The two girls were the perfect example of stupid, horror-film heroines (the type who run up the stairs instead of out the door). But aside from that, watch this film and ignore all the hype, all the good reviews and all the bad reviews - basically, watch this film without having any expectations, like I did - and you should find it to be a decent, engaging film, especially when you consider it was from a first-time director. 8/10
|
|
|
Post by B®ÄУȟ ÏÄÑ on Feb 12, 2006 19:02:06 GMT -5
I saw When A Stranger Calls. I didn't mind it too much. Although, I didn't like the ending. I like horror movies with more of a plot, but it wasn't that bad of a movie.
[glow=teal,2,300]<^>SGLR<^>[/glow]
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 7, 2024 15:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2006 19:17:28 GMT -5
The long Silent Hill trailer makes the movie look decent, I'm looking forward to it I guess.
|
|
|
Post by jerrysafunnyguy on Feb 13, 2006 0:31:42 GMT -5
House of the Dead 2 is on right now on Sci Fi. I've watched the first 10 minutes of it and it's highly cheesy. Might be better to watch in a group just to have fun with it. Heh, I watched it. It had some cool zombie gore, but low production value of course. Still, I enjoyed it since there was nothing else on. Saw II (2005) Directed by Darren Lynn Bousman Having only seen parts of the first Saw, I was hesitant to check this movie out, but my roommate assured me they were two separate films as far as the story goes so I'd be fine watching it. And I was. I though a lot of the kills were good, the gore was great, the acting held up and pushed the movie through, but the writing is what really stood out in this movie. Being the second movie in a series it managed to continue a good original story with an original twist, whether it was expected or not isn't the point. The point is that it all makes sense within the confines of the story and it does. I can't wait for Saw III, the set-up at the end of this movie was great. They could cut right to Detective Matthews, or they could do another story with the same character getting people to kill themselves or each other. ***/****
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Feb 13, 2006 12:05:24 GMT -5
Man House of the Dead II wasn't that bad. I was really surprised.
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Feb 13, 2006 17:14:24 GMT -5
I havent seen House of the Dead 2 yet, i will probably wait for the DVD. To those who have seen it, is it better than the first House of the Dead?
Im looking forward to Silent Hill. It looks decent, and at least Uwe Boll didnt direct it, otherwise it would be ****.
|
|