Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 9:24:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2008 20:32:20 GMT -5
Yep, thanks el hombre increíble. It's so awesome how a lot of it is filmed where I spend so much time, Zanzibar's a shitty strip club.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 12, 2008 20:55:06 GMT -5
t-minus 2...
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 12, 2008 21:00:30 GMT -5
I thought the casting looked good, up until Liv Tyler and William Hurt. Sorry folks, but Jennifer Connelly will always be the Sean Connery of Betty Rosses. And as far as Hurt goes...nobody tops Sam Elliott in the role of a soldier or a cowboy, except for maybe the Duke, but he hasn't done much acting since being frozen.
And nobody better complain about the CGI in Ang Lee's Hulk, because it looks exactly the same as this one.
But will I see it? Hell yeah. I've seen every theatrical Marvel flick since Blade.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 9:24:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2008 21:27:31 GMT -5
This Hulk looks a lot better and not cartoony like Ang Lee's, and Jennifer Connelly was awesome as Betty Ross.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Mar 12, 2008 21:42:50 GMT -5
I can not believe they could not get Eric Bana back. Ok your not very quick huh they didnt want him back HE SUCKED, the movie SUCKED, director SUCKED, this is not a sequel its a reboot/continuation whatever but it ignores the other piece of garbage and yah this movie looks amazing
|
|
|
Post by Sully© on Mar 12, 2008 21:47:59 GMT -5
This movie looks amazing.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Mar 12, 2008 21:57:54 GMT -5
xmen was one the worst comics to film ever and everyone needs to c that ...Have you actually seen any other comic book movies? I bet I can name 15 off the top of my head that were worse than X-Men. Ok I own every single comic books movie that came out in the last 30 years and I'm only 22. I can have a ing opinion can't I? and you can't name 20 movies worse then that because there is barely 30 out there let alone 20 that are better! Here I'll name 20 better then Xmen SM SM2 SM3 TMNT Ninja turtles (live action) Punisher (00's) Sin City Hellboy Batman Begins Batman (89') Batman Returns Superman (reeve) Superman 2 richard donner cut Daredevil X3 300 Blade Blade II Constantine V for Vendetta Batman Mask of the Phantasm (Even these movies sucked but are better Fantastic Four Ghost Rider) X1 and X2 friggin blew, it was wolverine the movie times two and now he gets his own damn movie anyway, they wasted 2 movies on plots that were made up based on what Bryan Singer wanted to see. He didnt care about the fans, he didnt develop any character except for Logan and a little Rogue wasted the whole second movie introducing only 2 new Xmen, and one of which didnt even come back for the third so it was a waste. Rattner did what he could to salvage that mess, introduce some fan favorite characters while bringing in a plot we waited through two crappy movies to see. And I realize the guy didnt get a big enough budget for sentinels but at least he gave us the damn danger room. Also not giving one character there trademark costume that they were seen in for over 60 years or something in the comic book is just pathetic. I'm not talking yellow spandex they could have stylized it for the modern times, they did it with F4, Daredevil, Spiderman, Batman, etc. Imagine the spiderman or fantastic four fans getting a movie with them in black leather jumpsuits because the director wanted them and thought the original costumes were cheesy PFFFT there woulda been a riot. Screw Singer he **** on Xmen then left to franchise (even know it was for the best he proved he didnt give a **** about the fans or what he made for the past 5 years prior) to do a god awful Superman film that was also what he wanted to see he is a selfish pig headed and overrated director. I believe we call that owned on these little ole' forums.
|
|
|
Post by sasso on Mar 12, 2008 23:19:13 GMT -5
...Have you actually seen any other comic book movies? I bet I can name 15 off the top of my head that were worse than X-Men. I believe we call that owned on these little ole' forums. God, you're such a f*cking idiot. It's things like these that make your posts not worth replying to. I'd be a waste of my time. Nice Watchmen banner Sasso. What do you think of the costumes they showed for Watchmen. Here's pretty much my thoughts on 'em: The Comedian: Pretty much nailed him. They got the essence of his costume down and the things they did add (like a slight change of material texture on some clothing) enhanced the whole look. Wig looks funky, but I assume it'll look good on-screen. Nite Owl II: Still have mixed feelings on this. While an exact adaption of his comic outfit would look too silly I think they made him look a bit too 'cool' as a lot of feedback on it said they made Nite Owl look badass and awesome, which is pretty much the opposite of what he was suppose to be. Cowl looks good but I really miss the cloak running up behind and attaching to the horns. Zipper on the front and shoulder/pec area is a nice touch and I do like the owl feather texture. As I said, while he does look silly (if he were in the real world) in a movie he still looks too 'cool' and I miss seeing that Dan was very out of shape. You can't tell in this suit. Ozymandias: Ughhhh. Good Lord, are they just trying to tell you who the 'bad guy' is of the story (Although I personally think Adrian is the hero)? I like that they made his costume more Egyptian themed but all the black has to go. Perhaps not totally, but as-it-is it's complete overkill. I do somewhat like the newer suit design, like the 'Batman and Robin' inspired torso piece as I see what Snyder's going for. Rorschach: Yeah, they got him perfectly down. Silk Spectre: I really think the new costume works well with here. Since the original costume was out because I don't think that it would be physically possible to make in real life, this is a good replacement. The lack of Doctor Manhattan makes me sad as he's my favorite in the book, I want to see if they throw clothes on him (for the entire movie). If they do, I'll be pissed. Back on topic: I really dig the newer Hulk design, it looks so much better than Ang Lee's version.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Mar 13, 2008 7:47:15 GMT -5
I don't think Hulk came across as all that different. He still looks like a big muscled up Shrek. I don't think this version is going to be any better.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 13, 2008 8:18:28 GMT -5
...Have you actually seen any other comic book movies? I bet I can name 15 off the top of my head that were worse than X-Men. Ok I own every single comic books movie that came out in the last 30 years and I'm only 22. I can have a ing opinion can't I? and you can't name 20 movies worse then that because there is barely 30 out there let alone 20 that are better! Here I'll name 20 better then Xmen SM SM2 SM3 TMNT Ninja turtles (live action) Punisher (00's) Sin City Hellboy Batman Begins Batman (89') Batman Returns Superman (reeve) Superman 2 richard donner cut Daredevil X3 300 Blade Blade II Constantine V for Vendetta Batman Mask of the Phantasm (Even these movies sucked but are better Fantastic Four Ghost Rider) X1 and X2 friggin blew, it was wolverine the movie times two and now he gets his own damn movie anyway, they wasted 2 movies on plots that were made up based on what Bryan Singer wanted to see. He didnt care about the fans, he didnt develop any character except for Logan and a little Rogue wasted the whole second movie introducing only 2 new Xmen, and one of which didnt even come back for the third so it was a waste. Rattner did what he could to salvage that mess, introduce some fan favorite characters while bringing in a plot we waited through two crappy movies to see. And I realize the guy didnt get a big enough budget for sentinels but at least he gave us the damn danger room. Also not giving one character there trademark costume that they were seen in for over 60 years or something in the comic book is just pathetic. I'm not talking yellow spandex they could have stylized it for the modern times, they did it with F4, Daredevil, Spiderman, Batman, etc. Imagine the spiderman or fantastic four fans getting a movie with them in black leather jumpsuits because the director wanted them and thought the original costumes were cheesy PFFFT there woulda been a riot. Screw Singer he **** on Xmen then left to franchise (even know it was for the best he proved he didnt give a **** about the fans or what he made for the past 5 years prior) to do a god awful Superman film that was also what he wanted to see he is a selfish pig headed and overrated director. I believe we call that owned on these little ole' forums. While I will agree that Daredevil is better than most people give it credit for (especially the Director's Cut), in no way was it better than any of the X-Men films.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Mar 13, 2008 8:21:38 GMT -5
...Have you actually seen any other comic book movies? I bet I can name 15 off the top of my head that were worse than X-Men. Ok I own every single comic books movie that came out in the last 30 years and I'm only 22. I can have a ing opinion can't I? and you can't name 20 movies worse then that because there is barely 30 out there let alone 20 that are better! Here I'll name 20 better then Xmen SM SM2 SM3 TMNT Ninja turtles (live action) Punisher (00's) Sin City Hellboy Batman Begins Batman (89') Batman Returns Superman (reeve) Superman 2 richard donner cut Daredevil X3 300 Blade Blade II Constantine V for Vendetta Batman Mask of the Phantasm (Even these movies sucked but are better Fantastic Four Ghost Rider) X1 and X2 friggin blew, it was wolverine the movie times two and now he gets his own damn movie anyway, they wasted 2 movies on plots that were made up based on what Bryan Singer wanted to see. He didnt care about the fans, he didnt develop any character except for Logan and a little Rogue wasted the whole second movie introducing only 2 new Xmen, and one of which didnt even come back for the third so it was a waste. Rattner did what he could to salvage that mess, introduce some fan favorite characters while bringing in a plot we waited through two crappy movies to see. And I realize the guy didnt get a big enough budget for sentinels but at least he gave us the damn danger room. Also not giving one character there trademark costume that they were seen in for over 60 years or something in the comic book is just pathetic. I'm not talking yellow spandex they could have stylized it for the modern times, they did it with F4, Daredevil, Spiderman, Batman, etc. Imagine the spiderman or fantastic four fans getting a movie with them in black leather jumpsuits because the director wanted them and thought the original costumes were cheesy PFFFT there woulda been a riot. Screw Singer he **** on Xmen then left to franchise (even know it was for the best he proved he didnt give a **** about the fans or what he made for the past 5 years prior) to do a god awful Superman film that was also what he wanted to see he is a selfish pig headed and overrated director. I believe we call that owned on these little ole' forums. No love for "The Crow"?
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Mar 13, 2008 10:22:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sasso on Mar 13, 2008 10:24:46 GMT -5
I don't think Hulk came across as all that different. He still looks like a big muscled up Shrek. I don't think this version is going to be any better. I still don't get it when people say that. What makes him look like Shrek, the fact that he's green?
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Mar 13, 2008 10:28:00 GMT -5
Those comparison shots really do the new Hulk justice. His face looks so much better.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Mar 13, 2008 10:30:12 GMT -5
I don't think Hulk came across as all that different. He still looks like a big muscled up Shrek. I don't think this version is going to be any better. I still don't get it when people say that. What makes him look like Shrek, the fact that he's green? I don't get either. Are people that stupid they think hulk copied shrek, Hulk's been around since 62'. The fact that Hulk's a better character and has been around a long time and Shrek's had what three movies.
|
|
|
Post by sasso on Mar 13, 2008 10:32:58 GMT -5
Not sure if these were posted yet.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Mar 13, 2008 10:38:47 GMT -5
They haven't been posted but I saw those last night. They good shots of both. The cg is better than first, but it makes me wonder how it would look if ILM did the cg especially with Iron Man appearing in Hulk.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Mar 13, 2008 10:48:24 GMT -5
Something just doesn't look right about this movie. Can't put my finger on it.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Mar 13, 2008 10:50:59 GMT -5
Ok I own every single comic books movie that came out in the last 30 years and I'm only 22. I can have a ing opinion can't I? and you can't name 20 movies worse then that because there is barely 30 out there let alone 20 that are better! Here I'll name 20 better then Xmen SM SM2 - wrong SM3 - wrong TMNT - wrong Ninja turtles (live action) - wrong Punisher (00's) - wrong Sin City Hellboy Batman Begins Batman (89') Batman Returns - wrong Superman (reeve) Superman 2 richard donner cut Daredevil - wrong X3 - wrong 300 Blade Blade II - wrong Constantine - wrong V for Vendetta Batman Mask of the Phantasm - wrong (Even these movies sucked but are better Fantastic Four - VERY WRONG Ghost Rider) - EXTREMELY WRONG
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Mar 13, 2008 10:55:18 GMT -5
Daredevil and Constantine? REALLY?
I hate Eric Bana, not a huge fan of Liv Tyler, do not like Ed Norton and wanna stick my tongue in Jennifer Connelly, so truthfully, Im mixed on this movie.
|
|