|
|
Post by sasso on Feb 7, 2008 18:41:25 GMT -5
2nd. First was good, second was great, third was a big cluster  of a mess. |
|
|
|
Post by The Assassin on Feb 7, 2008 19:40:12 GMT -5
3 was a big letdown for me. they tried to cram wayy too much into 1 movie. venom should have been spread over 2 movies. it all seemed rushed to me.
i can't decide which i think is best, either 1 or 2. probably 1.
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Feb 7, 2008 19:45:53 GMT -5
The first continues to be one of my favorites of all time. True spiderman.
The third one, I loved, until he got rid of the black suit. Then it got all mixed up. Harry should have came to Spidey's rescue in the 4th one. They should have ended it with Spidey ripping off the black suit and Sandman attacking the city.
|
|
|
|
Post by BigDaddyChacon on Feb 7, 2008 20:11:31 GMT -5
Part 2 was awesome. The other two are total crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by rockbottom423 on Feb 7, 2008 21:53:23 GMT -5
I think each of the movies has it's moments, I can't really decide on my favorite cause of this reason, but overall I might say the 1st one cause I don't think any part of that one dragged if I recall.
The third one was off the page, but I wish they had Carnage instead of The Sandman as the other villain, since the alien costume was involved, I do not know as much about it, but I think that Carnage is also an alien costume, which would have made more sense with Venom.
I was never a huge Doc Oc fan, I would have rather seen Lizard, Dr. Connors was in the second one referring to teh second one, though Alfred Molina did a great job.
|
|
