|
Post by Sean Taylor in Jail. on Dec 5, 2005 23:40:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jsh: on Dec 5, 2005 23:41:50 GMT -5
If they end the franchise after this with no gambit, I will kind of be disappointed.... Gambit was my second favorite mutant. I would venture to gess that if they haven't had him in it, not counting his name flashing on the screen, by this point, that he won't be in it period. I think it sucks too, he is my favorite. Not to mention if they did put him in there he would be young, if they were to stick with his love for Rouge. Ill be so pissed if Gambit isnt included in this movie, I mean, why wouldnt he, hes always been a decently big part of the X-Men. And hes so ing cool
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Dec 5, 2005 23:51:25 GMT -5
Gambit is lame, and his powers are lame. No Gambit is just fine with me.
|
|
|
Post by sm32baller on Dec 6, 2005 0:04:25 GMT -5
Gambit is lame, and his powers are lame. No Gambit is just fine with me. Agreed, Gambit is very lame. With that being said, this movie looks like it will be very good. Sure, there are a lot of mutant cameos but that is really fun and I think we have all agreed that Cyclops is the one who dies. Ratner might impress me yet.
|
|
|
Post by sm32baller on Dec 6, 2005 0:04:46 GMT -5
Gambit is lame, and his powers are lame. No Gambit is just fine with me. Agreed, Gambit is very lame. With that being said, this movie looks like it will be very good. Sure, there are a lot of mutant cameos but that is really fun and I think we have all agreed that Cyclops is the one who dies. Ratner might impress me yet.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Dec 6, 2005 0:10:24 GMT -5
I apologize to Ratner because this looks amazing and he pulled through for us. Everything in this entire trailer goes along with the script I read but I wasn't sure it was gonna work out. I guess it did
*****Spoilers***** ahead in the clear text......highlight this sucker if you wanna see
Ok first of all this is all based on the script I read or screen play whatever the hell it was called so if I'm wrong in the end don't be all pissy pants.
Here are a few proofs this is legit.
On the Cyclops/Funeral debate
It explains Scott "Cyclops" Summers dieing in the Alkali Lake area with full on "scruffy washed up" look as seen in the clips (Alkali Lake is the only place the clips in the trailer take place). Logan is there with him and Jean. (Logan is in those scenes holding his glasses) His death is described as Jean claiming to control the beam of his eyes when trying to kiss him after they find each other but "The script describes Scott’s skin as “shivering” until he is simply de-molecularized." (which looks like part of that scene and would also clear up the huge debate on the funeral or memorial with no casket, because he was demolecularized.
Iceman/ Rogue/ Kitty Pryde
Explains Iceman is sick of not being able to get too close to her and starts flirting with Kitty as shown in a clip in the teaser.
Angel Says he tried cutting his wings off because he hates being a mutant. Explaining why he was in the doctor's office is that his father was giving him the cure and he decides not to and fights off the orderlies. It also explains a scene with his wings in a complex harness device as shown in one of the stills from this afternoon.
Juggernaut Just a dumb henchmen like Sabretooth in X1
Beast Secretary of mutant affairs for the government as shown in the clip where he is at the buisness meeting.
Magneto The golden gate bridge scene is in full effect in this script/
and the one you've allllllllll been waiting for......yes based on this GAMBIT is in the damn movie! No telling how long because the 3rd act to the script is unavailable but it claims he is freed from the prison that Juggernaut is in by Magneto.
Sentinals
Sorry guys ain't happening in this film, those energy beams behind Storm are Jean's as opposed to the fire used in the cartoon and comic.
Now don't give me any of the "someone could have made that up after the trailer came out because it is from June of this year long before the X3 logo was even released. And if you would like the link IM me (eminem5074). Every scene it described was right based on the trailer.
It also says that the movie is very wish-washy and disoriented unlike X2 because it isn't clear what is going on whether it's mutants vs mutants or vs the military it's just a lot of action and little story.
Don't kill the messengar any other questions feel free to IM me (Eminem5074) and NO this wasn't posted so you could ruin it for other people either. It's just the specificity of this script is so good with the trailer such as cyclops' exact look in fillm that it cannot be false.
|
|
|
Post by John Zero on Dec 6, 2005 0:45:05 GMT -5
Gambit is lame, and his powers are lame. No Gambit is just fine with me. Yeah, being able to turn anything you touch into a charged explosive device really sucks. I'll still love you TRW.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Dec 6, 2005 1:08:14 GMT -5
Sentinal head or not? You be the judge!
|
|
JudakaiMalik
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 25, 2003 2:30:41 GMT -5
Posts: 945
|
Post by JudakaiMalik on Dec 6, 2005 1:40:56 GMT -5
I can't see it. Are there any other sites showing it?
|
|
RayReptile™
Main Eventer
I AM THE REPTILE
Joined on: Jul 5, 2002 15:51:28 GMT -5
Posts: 4,745
|
Post by RayReptile™ on Dec 6, 2005 2:16:21 GMT -5
I can't seem to get it to work.... Is it anywhere else yet?
|
|
|
Post by magnus on Dec 6, 2005 2:22:55 GMT -5
Like I said before. If it doesn't work update your quicktime and try again.
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Dec 6, 2005 2:31:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Raoul the Great on Dec 6, 2005 5:20:08 GMT -5
Oh good, the trailer still isn't working.
|
|
|
Post by kinglear on Dec 6, 2005 6:35:45 GMT -5
Emma -- really? I am profoundly disappointed, and angered, in the casting of a cheap blonde for the role of Ms. Frost. Even if the film is acceptable, I still won't be satisfied.
|
|
|
Post by jerrysafunnyguy on Dec 6, 2005 7:39:06 GMT -5
If they end the franchise after this with no gambit, I will kind of be disappointed.... Gambit was my second favorite mutant. Singer didn't like the character and didn't want to do him, I don't know what Rattner's deal was. The studio wanted him. But Singer didn't want to do Beast either because he couldn't do it right with CGI, but I think this one looks pretty cool.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 21, 2024 10:09:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2005 8:38:11 GMT -5
Syxx's big reply in white text said Gambit's in the movie.
oopz
|
|
|
Post by Thumper: One Year Later on Dec 6, 2005 18:45:20 GMT -5
If they end the franchise after this with no gambit, I will kind of be disappointed.... Gambit was my second favorite mutant. Singer didn't like the character and didn't want to do him, I don't know what Rattner's deal was. The studio wanted him. But Singer didn't want to do Beast either because he couldn't do it right with CGI, but I think this one looks pretty cool. Make up/ costumes > CGI. Beast looks good. Is there no nightcrawler? He was the best.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Dec 6, 2005 19:22:53 GMT -5
Singer didn't like the character and didn't want to do him, I don't know what Rattner's deal was. The studio wanted him. But Singer didn't want to do Beast either because he couldn't do it right with CGI, but I think this one looks pretty cool. Nah, Cumming is out, Frasier is in. Only room for one blue guy I guess in Fox's mind. Make up/ costumes > CGI. Beast looks good. Is there no nightcrawler? He was the best.
|
|
|
Post by HR2X on Dec 6, 2005 19:40:48 GMT -5
Juggs in action:
|
|
|
Post by tim on Dec 7, 2005 6:59:15 GMT -5
yeah that collosus in the hallway picture there. hes the studio shot of him i'm not really a fan of x-men, and i felt the 2nd movie was overrated as it was terribly boring at times... this one looks alright, but i dont really trust rattner to resist totally cheesing-out most of the movie.
|
|