|
Post by captain master talbot on Apr 6, 2008 19:35:50 GMT -5
Ruthless Agression
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Apr 6, 2008 19:41:00 GMT -5
Attitude Era
|
|
|
Post by The Raven Effect on Apr 6, 2008 19:54:47 GMT -5
I loved the 2000-2001 era, but the 2004-2007 was pretty good as well. Hard to choose just one.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Apr 6, 2008 19:57:34 GMT -5
2002-2004 should be called the When Smackdown was Better than Raw Period
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Apr 6, 2008 20:17:25 GMT -5
attitude, but also the post-steroid crisis age.
|
|
JM™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 25, 2005 14:14:37 GMT -5
Posts: 1,430
|
Post by JM™ on Apr 6, 2008 23:54:53 GMT -5
|
|
bc - RockAFire Style
Main Eventer
50 Refs, 1300 + Ebay Feedback
Joined on: Jul 22, 2005 4:00:43 GMT -5
Posts: 2,118
|
Post by bc - RockAFire Style on Apr 7, 2008 2:32:29 GMT -5
85-97
|
|
vivalaraza1331
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 3, 2006 9:48:08 GMT -5
Posts: 1,001
|
Post by vivalaraza1331 on Apr 7, 2008 7:38:07 GMT -5
2000-2001 era featured the best in-ring work the WWE had ever seen, and that includes the Michaels and Hart title reigns. Sure, Bret and Shawn brought the work rate but outside of them, there was little to nothing. There was rarely a big show between 2000 and 2001 where I didn't feel like I got my money's worth.
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Powers on Apr 7, 2008 7:41:00 GMT -5
1988 thru 1992.
My Glory Days of wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Apr 7, 2008 11:16:17 GMT -5
I like every era but the last five years. OH, and the invasion sucked too.
|
|
|
Post by Groundswell on Apr 7, 2008 12:31:17 GMT -5
Attitude Era or of course the Age of Orton.
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Apr 7, 2008 13:01:49 GMT -5
Attitude and Ruthless Agression.
The fanboy in me wants to say The Age of Orton though.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Apr 7, 2008 14:14:57 GMT -5
Attitude, Name Here and Age Of Orton (If it stays good).
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Apr 7, 2008 14:19:36 GMT -5
The Attitude Era without a shout of a doubt..Maybe the Invasion right after..
|
|
|
Post by irishcollector on Apr 7, 2008 15:48:10 GMT -5
1989-2004 its all good
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Apr 7, 2008 16:06:35 GMT -5
Attitude, easily. The Orton Era's been decent, but it definately shouldn't be on anyone's favorite list.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Apr 7, 2008 16:21:18 GMT -5
Since the Attitude Era ended in 2001, I'm going to give the years. 1999-2004, 2006-now. The first era because it was when I started watching wrestling, until where I thought WWE kind of went downhill for a bit, a lot of 2005 was lackluster IMO, but I liked a lot of stuff in 06 and 07 and am currently enjoying the product almost a lot more now than I used to back years ago.
|
|
doink317
Main Eventer
Welcome Back Artie!
Joined on: Aug 22, 2006 16:19:10 GMT -5
Posts: 1,294
|
Post by doink317 on Apr 7, 2008 17:16:48 GMT -5
My favorite years for wrestling period would be 1996-1999.
|
|
jcjdotcom
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 23, 2005 23:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 530
|
Post by jcjdotcom on Apr 8, 2008 13:21:58 GMT -5
I loved the McMahon-Helmsley Era. I agree. This was the only time I watched wrestling religiously. I didn't miss an episode for about two years. Other than that, I try to keep up with what's going on, but I rarely watch.
|
|
|
Post by cenaroxorz123 on Apr 8, 2008 17:22:12 GMT -5
No, Orton is now calling his reign as champion, Age Of Orton. Almost every time someone becomes champ they say it's the beginning of the "(Insert Name Here) Era." Really, how much has WWE changed since from 2007 to 2008?
|
|