Mattie!
Main Eventer
@MattieHH5000
Joined on: Apr 21, 2006 15:30:11 GMT -5
Posts: 2,990
|
Post by Mattie! on Apr 18, 2008 16:17:25 GMT -5
these figs are amazing!!! thats a way to put it the attires are dead on and the head and hair basically are the ultimate way of styling! the second city saints are amazing! seriously mate keep up the awesome work!
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on Apr 18, 2008 16:49:18 GMT -5
all your work is great apart from the city saints, punk just doesnt look good, the tatoos are badly done and not sized right also that torso is way too big, I hate the way you did the designs on Colt they just look to flat, the head is ok but doesnt really bare much resembelence. no doubt Cass will say this post is me trying to hold you back
|
|
Joliet Jake
Superstar
Ya see, me and the Lord have an understanding.
Joined on: Apr 25, 2007 14:11:00 GMT -5
Posts: 738
|
Post by Joliet Jake on Apr 18, 2008 17:09:50 GMT -5
all your work is great apart from the city saints, punk just doesnt look good, the tatoos are badly done and not sized right also that torso is way too big, I hate the way you did the designs on Colt they just look to flat, the head is ok but doesnt really bare much resembelence. no doubt Cass will say this post is me trying to hold you back mmmm well i'll agree with you that the tattoo's don't look that great but instead of using one of punks already made upper bodies i thought i'd give it a try. How would you have made the attire on colt better? His attire is layers upon layers of blends at different opacities and tons of burning and dodging done to bring out the reflections of the plastic. I think you're way off on not thinking the head bares much of a resemblance... i think it looks pretty close to what he actually looks like, the jaw line, hair, shape of his head, nose and eyebrows are as close as you're gonna get from using pieces from existing protos. The eyes are the only thing with the face that could be more accurate. You're entitled to your opinion and thanks for posting your genuine feelings. What would you do to improve the figures?
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on Apr 18, 2008 17:22:46 GMT -5
all your work is great apart from the city saints, punk just doesnt look good, the tatoos are badly done and not sized right also that torso is way too big, I hate the way you did the designs on Colt they just look to flat, the head is ok but doesnt really bare much resembelence. no doubt Cass will say this post is me trying to hold you back mmmm well i'll agree with you that the tattoo's don't look that great but instead of using one of punks already made upper bodies i thought i'd give it a try. How would you have made the attire on colt better? His attire is layers upon layers of blends at different opacities and tons of burning and dodging done to bring out the reflections of the plastic. I think you're way off on not thinking the head bares much of a resemblance... i think it looks pretty close to what he actually looks like, the jaw line, hair, shape of his head, nose and eyebrows are as close as you're gonna get from using pieces from existing protos. The eyes are the only thing with the face that could be more accurate. You're entitled to your opinion and thanks for posting your genuine feelings. What would you do to improve the figures? well to me it seems like you wasted your time with the colt designs by spending ages doing something that has the same effect as overlay and a bit of levels tweaking and it looks like some lighting doesnt match up making it look flat, the colt has the right sort of features yes , but it still looks too much like bulldog rather than colt you can easily moprh the features to fit your liking using liquify as long as you dont overdo it. Another problem I see is the way designs go over gaps/joints you should either make those parts darker or erase them. For the punk I would've used the Rey torso or flabby torso with some modding, the shw torso is far too big for my liking, the straight edge tatoo looks far too small and the left(perspective left) arm tatoos are misplaced and same on the right, there also looks like some are missing. The shorts are pretty good though.
|
|
|
Post by brethitmanhart on Apr 18, 2008 17:24:32 GMT -5
Honestly MJH, I don't usually disagree with you but I think your been over critical. Both figures are very decent. Yes, they might have 1 or 2 problems but nothing as major as your making out.
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on Apr 18, 2008 17:35:12 GMT -5
Honestly MJH, I don't usually disagree with you but I think your been over critical. Both figures are very decent. Yes, they might have 1 or 2 problems but nothing as major as your making out. I only pointed out like two things to begin with and I think those are major points not minor ones.
|
|
|
Post by juicyg on Apr 22, 2008 0:04:10 GMT -5
your really good 10/10 for all
|
|