|
Post by bad guy™ on Apr 14, 2008 8:36:15 GMT -5
But then again, I think. This is Dave Meltzer we are talking about. Should we honestly take any of his crap seriously? I mean really.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Apr 14, 2008 9:10:59 GMT -5
Anyone that calls the Gimmick Battle Royal a "dud" is a complete goof, in my opinion. MELTZER HAS SPOKEN AND YOU WILL NOT DISPUTE HIM!!! ![>:(](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/angry.gif)
|
|
|
Post by AP on Apr 14, 2008 9:53:12 GMT -5
wait.... Someone/Meltzer reported that King Mabel was going to be the third nWo member back in the day???
SOMEONE PLEASE ELABORATE!
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Apr 14, 2008 10:06:12 GMT -5
Umm...the only good matches at WM 21 were Angle/Michaels and Stratus/Hemme. ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif) In your opinion. Which is stupid if you ask me.....Trish/Christy better than Orton/Taker ?! Are you kidding me ?!
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Apr 14, 2008 10:28:39 GMT -5
Anyone that calls the Gimmick Battle Royal a "dud" is a complete goof, in my opinion. MELTZER HAS SPOKEN AND YOU WILL NOT DISPUTE HIM!!! ![>:(](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/angry.gif) Yes sir. ![:-[](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/embarassed.gif)
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 26, 2024 13:46:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2008 10:36:26 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 21 was mixed bag in my opinion. I wouldn't rank it in the top 10 of all wrestlemanias. He seems to have hated 4 and 5. Wrestlemanias 4 and 5 are in my top 5.
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Apr 14, 2008 10:47:04 GMT -5
1. WM19 2. WM17 3. WM20
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 26, 2024 13:46:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2008 12:37:32 GMT -5
3 1/2 Stars for HBK/Flair?
That match deserves 5 stars.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Apr 14, 2008 12:43:14 GMT -5
Umm...the only good matches at WM 21 were Angle/Michaels and Stratus/Hemme. ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif) In your opinion. Which is stupid if you ask me.....Trish/Christy better than Orton/Taker ?! Are you kidding me ?! I forgot about Taker vs. Orton.
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Apr 14, 2008 13:04:44 GMT -5
Notice, those events had less matches, therefore they will rank higher. Not if the scores are averaged That's my point, the fewer the matches averaging out will effect the total more dramatically. It doesn't mean that they are better events, they average out higher because the card is so small.
|
|