|
|
Post by Captain McKay on Sept 2, 2006 17:06:17 GMT -5
This refers to DC Direct's Batman figures...the ones where he's got a black cape/boots, etc look awesome with the black shorts. But when they make figures with blue cape/cowl, boots, gloves, why don't they make the shorts blue as well? I mean, in the comics, the shorts were blue also, am I right?
I don't get it. The new Re-Animated Batman figure looks awesome, all except for the black shorts. If the gloves and boots are blue, then so should be the shorts.
Sorry for the ramble.
|
|
cosmicspidey
Main Eventer
Remove Joe Quesada
Joined on: Feb 18, 2003 3:07:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,037
|
Post by cosmicspidey on Sept 2, 2006 20:11:17 GMT -5
Umm...yes? Give us a pic or something. DC's made like 30 Batmen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain McKay on Sept 3, 2006 14:29:15 GMT -5
Here's the scheme I mean -  It's been applied to the '50s Batman figure in the "Evolution of Batman" set, as well as the repainted "Hush" Batman that appears in the "Re-Animated" line, along with many other Bat-figures. I personally think these would look cooler (and as a die-hard Bat-fan, more comic accurate) in blue shorts rather than black. |
|
|
|
Post by HR2X on Sept 3, 2006 20:08:14 GMT -5
It may be just for the 'shadowed' effect.. I mean look at the mask, the mask just had shadows on it, it wasn't actually black in that spot.
|
|
cosmicspidey
Main Eventer
Remove Joe Quesada
Joined on: Feb 18, 2003 3:07:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,037
|
Post by cosmicspidey on Sept 5, 2006 12:09:53 GMT -5
The black tights are comic-accurate. That's how they were colored back in the 50s.
|
|
