Post by modano09 on Apr 24, 2008 21:18:45 GMT -5
Alright I'm just going to throw this out there before the poor guy gets raosted for this. The man is 7 foot 3 I don't know what you want from him as far as athelticism goes. If you guys are expecting him to take phenom bumps and run around the ring then you're idiots. He plays the big man roll to a T. You see some wreslters should wrestle in certain ways, and I strongly believe that Khali is good at playing that huge giant roll. Should he be in the main event? Certainly not, but I no problem seeing him in the mid card. To be frank I got to wonder whether Andre would be able to get over as well in todays wrestling world, the msytique of the big man has certainly diminshed. Although lets be honest Andre was a freak as for as his athelticism in comparison to his size goes.
As far as Khali's school goes, he's wrestled all around the world, as far was we know he might have a phenomenal knowledge of wrestling, it's nice to see him giving back in some form.
its sad how the big guys don't have that scariness they had back in the 70's and 80's. its also sad that people don't get that WWE is limiting what Khali is doing , the way he wrestles and the way he speaks english (watch the longest yard he spoke better english in that movie then in WWE)
I know what you mean. Back in the day, a guy being Khali's size would be impressive. Fans would buy into him as a monster and wonder if anyone could beat him. I felt that way about The Big Show (Giant) in 1996, he was just so big, who could beat him? I think we've gotten so spoiled/impressed by work rate and little guys we crapall over the big guys now because we're missing the point. Yeah, they're slow and can't wrestle well, but if you suspend disbelief, get into the idea of a little guy trying to bring down a monster.