|
|
Post by spamisgood on Apr 26, 2008 17:02:45 GMT -5
Honestly to me it's not a big dea, at least for me. Since I display it facing front you wont even see it. Im content with my RA32 Umaga. Until he gets a new scan then I wwont buy. One back tatoo isnt going to make me buy a figure I just bought earlier in the month.
|
|
|
|
Post by The 'Rated R Superstar' Edge on Apr 26, 2008 17:12:49 GMT -5
thanks for the pic, but he doesn't have his newer hand tattoos ffs, he has hand tats? We've never had an up-to-date Umaga fig  |
|
|
|
Post by batista1fan on Apr 26, 2008 17:44:19 GMT -5
thanks i will get it along with da kendrick
|
|
Soapy
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 8, 2008 4:05:41 GMT -5
Posts: 569
|
Post by Soapy on Apr 26, 2008 17:46:52 GMT -5
I'm happy with my WM24 Umanga  I don't look at the back of my figs thaaaat much! |
|
|
|
Post by Batista on Apr 26, 2008 17:54:03 GMT -5
Sweet, thanks for the pics. Im glad I waited to get his figure. I wish they would release his red tights with black logo though.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Apr 26, 2008 18:15:44 GMT -5
thats cool thanks for sharing
|
|
|
|
Post by ultimateking on Apr 26, 2008 19:47:41 GMT -5
Ill probably get it, but i dont want the HHH I'm just the opposite. I want that HHH fig, but really don't want Umaga. Slap that H fig on ebay, dude, and I'll buy it off ya.  It's cool that they included the back tat. Nice attention to detail. I figured that when they did, it would wind up way too small. |
|
CM Punk
Main Eventer
Bite My Shinny Metal Ass
Joined on: Aug 22, 2007 15:30:12 GMT -5
Posts: 2,553
|
Post by CM Punk on Apr 26, 2008 21:00:09 GMT -5
deffinatly buying
|
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Apr 26, 2008 21:28:49 GMT -5
When he was feuding with HHH he never had the hand tattoo - so there's no reason why this figure would have it..
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Apr 26, 2008 22:23:15 GMT -5
Hm... this had me thinking now. I like the Umagas torso much better then the old one, plus I like the back tat and tights... but the HHH is just alright. Should I spend the $15 bucks basically for the Umaga?? I dunno really. I might get the set, Umaga looks really good. But I dont need a crappy HHH. I'll think about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ultimateking on Apr 26, 2008 22:23:22 GMT -5
When he was feuding with HHH he never had the hand tattoo - so there's no reason why this figure would have it.. That's a good point. I'm sure jakks would never have thought of it, but ironically, it turned out like that. |
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Apr 26, 2008 22:29:16 GMT -5
Thanks for the pics Mr. Fantasy!
|
|
dgnr8
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 12, 2006 11:38:01 GMT -5
Posts: 3,914
|
Post by dgnr8 on Apr 27, 2008 0:25:05 GMT -5
I'm glad I waited to update Umagas. I just wish Jakks would stop using that damn torso. It just doesn't look right.
|
|
|
|
Post by The L.F.C Fan on Apr 27, 2008 4:07:43 GMT -5
Hm.. I'll probably pass untill he gets an AD with someone worth buying OR a singles release with it (IDK if PPV17 has it?)
|
|
|
|
Post by catsarefunny on Apr 27, 2008 5:42:43 GMT -5
I need a ring gear Trips and an Umaga so this set is good  |
|
|
|
Post by hbk4champ on Apr 27, 2008 7:14:24 GMT -5
im so getting that now.
|
|
the hell demon
Main Eventer
i must possess all, or i possess nothing
Joined on: Nov 16, 2006 12:48:46 GMT -5
Posts: 3,592
|
Post by the hell demon on Apr 27, 2008 9:31:43 GMT -5
I'll wait until Umaga gets a single release with the new tats. I have way too many Cripple Haitches as it is. DA red Youmanga with back tat would be killer. |
|
|
|
Post by spamisgood on Apr 27, 2008 15:02:11 GMT -5
You kinow what I just now noticed? After one figure they got rid of the neck tatoos. They replace the neck tatoos with a back tatoo. Can't they just have both?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Apr 27, 2008 15:03:24 GMT -5
Thats cool. Thanks for the pics.
|
|
