|
Post by K5 on Apr 28, 2008 22:44:24 GMT -5
i could easily see it, yes. as long as he stays marketable, which i don't doubt
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Apr 28, 2008 23:53:37 GMT -5
He will NEVER be on par with Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, Stone Cold, Rock, Undertaker, even Shawn Michaels. He surpassed Hogan about 5 years ago as far as greatness goes Triple H hasn't done a damn thing, he couldn't lace Hogan's boots even if he tried.
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Apr 28, 2008 23:57:32 GMT -5
He surpassed Hogan about 5 years ago as far as greatness goes Triple H hasn't done a damn thing, he couldn't lace Hogan's boots even if he tried. HHH is a way better wrestler. However no one will top Hogan as far as drawing power goes without burning out quick or retiring. Such as Austin and The rock.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Apr 29, 2008 0:05:40 GMT -5
Im gonna say no for the simple fact that in my book he only has 6 WWF/E World title wins. The WHC is a 2nd tier title. If thats the case then Jerry Lawlers 30 something USWA titles is the record. All of the titles Flair won (NWA, WCW, WWF) had importance Second tier? My friend i believe you have mixed up the smackdown and ECW titles. Just because it hasn`t been around as long as the WWE, doesn`t mean it`s a second tier title, The ECW title is a second tier title The World Heavyweight Championship is a 2nd tier title. When you think of main titles in wrestling History you go WWF & NWA. WCW, AWA, Original ECW would all fall into the next level. The WHC ranks right up there with the US and IC titles. The new ECW title is around the European title ranks. The actual physical belt (or design) means a ton for wrestling but in the grand scheme of wrestling history that title linage mean absolutely crap
|
|