|
Post by Great White Shark on Nov 26, 2008 7:21:06 GMT -5
Yes the box art is very nice, but it's not telling us anything we don't already know.
Anyway i'd say these guys are defintes for the game.....
Hogan (confirmed) Andre (confirmed) Rock (confirmed) Austin (confirmed)
Bret Hart Roddy Piper Jimmy Snuka Sgt Slaughter Shawn Michaels Ted Dibiase Triple H Undertaker Kane Jake Roberts Rick Rude Mr Perfect Ric Flair Animal Hawk British Bulldog
I think it's safe to assume thos guys above are pretty much dead certs, but i really want some of the following guys...... but i really have my doubts about them making it into the game.
Ultimate Warrior Ricky Steamboat Sid Vicious Vader Big Boss Man King Kong Bundy Ax Smash Haku Big John Studd Ahmed Johnson Goldust Tatanka Earthquake Doink The Clown Eddie Guerrero Bam Bam Bigelow Diesel Honky Tonk Man Rick Martel Razor Ramon Lex Luger Giant Gonzalez Typhoon Mabel
I guess we will just have to wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Nov 26, 2008 8:14:04 GMT -5
Im looking forward to this game, the box art looks very nice although i think that Taker would have been deserving of a spot on the cover.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 11:31:45 GMT -5
I guess we will just have to wait and see. Bam Bam and Eddie may not be confirmed but I'd say that both have a decent shot of being included.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Nov 26, 2008 11:37:08 GMT -5
Anyone think Warrior has a somewhat small chance of being in the game? He seems to have calmed down recently, I mean he actually wrestled in Italy/Spain, where ever it was. We saw Bret Hart and Vince McMahon come to an agreement, that was surprising enough.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 12:01:41 GMT -5
No chance.. do do do do do.. no chance in hell!
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Nov 26, 2008 12:27:50 GMT -5
Does anybody else think the whole "connectivity" with Smackdown 09 is going to be a much more limited thing than we're expecting? Like, obviously we can transfer superstars over; but maybe it'll just be five at a time or something. I.E: You can only have five stored on your HD ready for use in LOW. - I'm probably way off mark, but I was just having a think.
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Nov 26, 2008 12:33:17 GMT -5
Does anybody else think the whole "connectivity" with Smackdown 09 is going to be a much more limited thing than we're expecting? Like, obviously we can transfer superstars over; but maybe it'll just be five at a time or something. I.E: You can only have five stored on your HD ready for use in LOW. - I'm probably way off mark, but I was just having a think. Hey, 5 is still better than none
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 12:47:15 GMT -5
I just hope there is DLC for LOW.
|
|
whydraft2
Main Eventer
WF 15+ Year Member
Joined on: Oct 14, 2006 18:12:49 GMT -5
Posts: 1,209
|
Post by whydraft2 on Nov 26, 2008 13:30:24 GMT -5
I really want to see Demolition in it...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 15:50:19 GMT -5
I really wanna see it for PS2! Screw you Sony!!
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Nov 26, 2008 15:56:07 GMT -5
Anyone think Warrior has a somewhat small chance of being in the game? He seems to have calmed down recently, I mean he actually wrestled in Italy/Spain, where ever it was. We saw Bret Hart and Vince McMahon come to an agreement, that was surprising enough. It would be bad ass and I keep little hope for it but I would bet he won't. The box art is sexy. Being able to transfer some superstars over from SD vs Raw is a great idea and it will certainly keep people happy when some of their current favorites aren't in the game...which would defeat the purpose of this new game anyway. So I guess when LOW comes out I'm going to have to rent SD vs Raw to pick up a few guys. Just thinking about that is awesome. High five to whoever came up with that simple concept.
|
|
J.Freek
Main Eventer
Best in the World
Joined on: Dec 8, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by J.Freek on Nov 26, 2008 17:09:46 GMT -5
why won't it be on the Wii?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 17:42:21 GMT -5
why won't it be on the Wii? The Wii? Man the Wii controller is like a heh.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:45:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 17:53:34 GMT -5
why won't it be on the Wii? The Wii? Man the Wii controller is like a heh. LMFAO THQ doesn't want to dumb down the game. THQ creative manager has stated that they can't do what they want on the last gen systems. Wii doesn't have the hardware to compete with PS3/360. The Wii is not truely next gen. It just has gimmicky controls.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 26, 2008 17:53:54 GMT -5
I really wanna see it for PS2! Screw you Sony!! Or.. you can get off your butt and stop being cheap and buy one. I see no reason you can't get one. Bring on the "OMGZ DA EXCOMPNY BLOWS" excuses.
|
|
J.Freek
Main Eventer
Best in the World
Joined on: Dec 8, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by J.Freek on Nov 26, 2008 18:03:23 GMT -5
The Wii? Man the Wii controller is like a heh. LMFAO THQ doesn't want to dumb down the game. THQ creative manager has stated that they can't do what they want on the last gen systems. Wii doesn't have the hardware to compete with PS3/360. The Wii is not truely next gen. It just has gimmicky controls. yes it is like it or not I really wanna see it for PS2! Screw you Sony!! Or.. you can get off your butt and stop being cheap and buy one. I see no reason you can't get one. Bring on the "OMGZ DA EXCOMPNY BLOWS" excuses. Not everyone has money to lay out for ps3 or 360 right now, I don't want a 360 I know people who have one and have had to send theirs back numerous time because of the red ring of death. Even for $199 its not worth the hassle unless I got it as a gift. The ps3 I might get eventually I just thought it would of been on the Wii as it is a next-gen system
|
|
|
Post by mattoriginal on Nov 26, 2008 18:09:14 GMT -5
LMFAO THQ doesn't want to dumb down the game. THQ creative manager has stated that they can't do what they want on the last gen systems. Wii doesn't have the hardware to compete with PS3/360. The Wii is not truely next gen. It just has gimmicky controls. yes it is like it or not Or.. you can get off your butt and stop being cheap and buy one. I see no reason you can't get one. Bring on the "OMGZ DA EXCOMPNY BLOWS" excuses. Not everyone has money to lay out for ps3 or 360 right now, I don't want a 360 I know people who have one and have had to send theirs back numerous time because of the red ring of death. Even for $199 its not worth the hassle unless I got it as a gift. The ps3 I might get eventually I just thought it would of been on the Wii as it is a next-gen system I've had my 360 for almost a year now, and nothing has happened. And if you were truly in as bad economic shape, should you be laying 60 bucks for a game?
|
|
J.Freek
Main Eventer
Best in the World
Joined on: Dec 8, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by J.Freek on Nov 26, 2008 18:16:48 GMT -5
yes it is like it or not Not everyone has money to lay out for ps3 or 360 right now, I don't want a 360 I know people who have one and have had to send theirs back numerous time because of the red ring of death. Even for $199 its not worth the hassle unless I got it as a gift. The ps3 I might get eventually I just thought it would of been on the Wii as it is a next-gen system I've had my 360 for almost a year now, and nothing has happened. And if you were truly in as bad economic shape, should you be laying 60 bucks for a game? I didn't say I was in a bad economic state I said some people are, I meant im not going to buy a system for one game as the only games I really play are wrestling and other sports games.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 26, 2008 18:19:46 GMT -5
I've had my 360 for almost a year now, and nothing has happened. And if you were truly in as bad economic shape, should you be laying 60 bucks for a game? I didn't say I was in a bad economic state I said some people are, I meant im not going to buy a system for one game as the only games I really play are wrestling and other sports games. My 360 is still working fine and I play it almost every day. I use to be just like you - I only played wrestling and sports game. Until I got my 360 now I'm playing games I would've never played (Halo etc). I don't get the economic excuse - you can't afford a 200 game system but you can afford to drive to GameStop and spend 60+ on a game - doesn't add up imo.
|
|
J.Freek
Main Eventer
Best in the World
Joined on: Dec 8, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by J.Freek on Nov 26, 2008 18:23:43 GMT -5
I have the wii, which I got as a birthday present from my mom, and I do play some non-sports games on there though. I only have like 3 game(wii sport, Wii Play, and battle of the bands) but I know for christmas from my mom she got me 6 wii games. My mom goes all out for christmas for me and my 2 sisters both older then me, I currently am unemployed and living at home and going to college but stilll trying to find something work wise. I rarely buy games normally unless I do a trade in with other games or if I find a cheapy
|
|