|
|
Post by Mark on May 15, 2008 7:19:08 GMT -5
Exactly, WAS one of the best. Now in 2008, he's washed up. there is no such thing as washed up in wrestling. that is what we called a legend .there is no such thing as washed up in wrestling just ignorant clseminded fans who think like that & show nothing but to disrespect to legends like that .they have no clue what they are talking about at all. most of these kids in tna can learn alot from scott steiners. most of tna does not even know how to work a match right unless they are legend like scott steiner. most of the kids & including joe does not know ring pyschology & that is most important part of wrestle not spots & no selling .scott steiner can shows these kids how to wrestle right & that is why he is there.also scott steiner will never be washed up . he will just be a legend you prolly think steiner didnt use roids too huh? |
|
|
|
Post by therealjswo on May 15, 2008 10:28:13 GMT -5
Joe vs. Stenier won't draw money and that's not because of Joe. TNA needs to be different and stop using guys we've seen for 20 years. The only way TNA will make money is to establish it's self as the "cool alternative." If they don't, they are bound to get the same numbers and won't grow. scott steiner is not legend because of my opinion. scott steiner is a legend is a fact . scott steiner is part of the greatest tag team ever the steiner brothers & is a former WCW tv champion,WCW US champion,& WCW world heavywieght champion. so Scott steiner being a legend is a fact .the steiner brothers beat every great tag team ever. steiner draws more then joes does & that is fact . scott steiner is a name compared to joe. if Joe vs. Stenier won't draw money & then it is joes fault not soctt steiners. scott steiner has never stop being a draw. Joe vs. Stenier matches have been better then joe vs angle matches & that is a fact.[/quote] From the jibberish I could understand in the above, I can clearly say you have no idea what you are speaking about. Nor do you know how to type a coherent sentence. |
|
|
|
Post by mercennario1080 on May 15, 2008 10:33:44 GMT -5
It has nothing to do with Samoa Joe being champion. Well, it does but it's not Joe's fault. Samoa Joe was booked like **** for a year or so before winning the title. It's hard to take someone serious when they have about 8 titles shots and out of those 8 they win one. Pretty much so. Besides, booking matches involving poles and having the show focus on Kurt Angle isnt due to Joe. TNA conitnues to have bad booking poison their product. Dont blame Joe. He isnt on tv enough to be blamed for the ratings. Maybe that's the problem... |
|
