|
|
Post by Tim Tebow™ on May 30, 2008 17:33:32 GMT -5
Well, if we're combining Underground and United States titles...then combine the names. So....Under United States. WPF Mexico Championship. I vote for this. |
|
|
|
Post by cjs. on May 30, 2008 17:47:52 GMT -5
I kinda agree with Jomo about the voting, I think the system is pretty good at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on May 30, 2008 18:11:52 GMT -5
I kinda agree with Jomo about the voting, I think the system is pretty good at the moment. Same for Jomo. Why do you even care? You don't vote.  |
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on May 30, 2008 18:22:18 GMT -5
it's coz of votes like these:
"Gazza - I like it more. Attire is amazing."
"MJH- him and dielawn are the two bets figs of the week nough said "
"Spencer- watts with bb's lower body"
Anyone can easily be biased and type crap like that out but at least with votes like these:
"Cass vs. Dielawn: Both very good figures. But Sabin is far too pale, and the logo goes over the joints. The right forearm is choppy too. The head, albeit very good, is inaccurate foe the time period of the attire. I love the colours on Cass's, and the torso edit is very good. MY VOTE: CASS"
more is pointed out making to easier to see if it's biased and it's also helpfull to the person by pointing out points to fix. Honestly I really dont wanna win if all my votes are like "MJH - Better head", I'd much rather get constructive criticism and an opinion on my figure otherwise it just sounds like the person glanced at each figure. Also votes like that feed egos and make people delusional, if someone's getting "amazing attire" votes every week then they dont see their own flaws and never improve.
|
|
|
|
Post by sycho1warrior on May 30, 2008 18:28:33 GMT -5
True, but isn't this going abit off topic in some ways. In some ways i don't care why people vote for me, i just wanna win some, I've lost all then i've one, once i win some more then i'll care, but it dosen't mean im not going to give good detailed votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on May 30, 2008 19:30:48 GMT -5
Ah, I guess MJH is right, although, WPF has gotten better with biased voting.
It's fine.
|
|
imdielawn
Main Eventer
watch.imdielawn.com
Joined on: Jul 16, 2003 10:42:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,864
|
Post by imdielawn on May 30, 2008 20:01:04 GMT -5
Dielawn gets my vote because he is Dielawn.
|
|
|
|
Post by duan on May 30, 2008 21:04:40 GMT -5
it's coz of votes like these: "Gazza - I like it more. Attire is amazing." "MJH- him and dielawn are the two bets figs of the week nough said " "Spencer- watts with bb's lower body" Anyone can easily be biased and type crap like that out but at least with votes like these: "Cass vs. Dielawn: Both very good figures. But Sabin is far too pale, and the logo goes over the joints. The right forearm is choppy too. The head, albeit very good, is inaccurate foe the time period of the attire. I love the colours on Cass's, and the torso edit is very good. MY VOTE: CASS" more is pointed out making to easier to see if it's biased and it's also helpfull to the person by pointing out points to fix. Honestly I really dont wanna win if all my votes are like "MJH - Better head", I'd much rather get constructive criticism and an opinion on my figure otherwise it just sounds like the person glanced at each figure. Also votes like that feed egos and make people delusional, if someone's getting "amazing attire" votes every week then they dont see their own flaws and never improve. Win. |
|
|
|
Post by Cass on May 30, 2008 21:31:34 GMT -5
it's coz of votes like these: "Gazza - I like it more. Attire is amazing." "MJH- him and dielawn are the two bets figs of the week nough said " "Spencer- watts with bb's lower body" Anyone can easily be biased and type crap like that out but at least with votes like these: "Cass vs. Dielawn: Both very good figures. But Sabin is far too pale, and the logo goes over the joints. The right forearm is choppy too. The head, albeit very good, is inaccurate foe the time period of the attire. I love the colours on Cass's, and the torso edit is very good. MY VOTE: CASS" more is pointed out making to easier to see if it's biased and it's also helpfull to the person by pointing out points to fix. Honestly I really dont wanna win if all my votes are like "MJH - Better head", I'd much rather get constructive criticism and an opinion on my figure otherwise it just sounds like the person glanced at each figure. Also votes like that feed egos and make people delusional, if someone's getting "amazing attire" votes every week then they dont see their own flaws and never improve. Win. and yet, i've been complaining for months |
|
|
|
Post by duan on May 30, 2008 23:17:47 GMT -5
and yet, i've been complaining for months and yet, still nobody cares about you. |
|
|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on May 30, 2008 23:42:17 GMT -5
Chris Cass was once Santa Clause.
Many girls and boys cared about him at a time...
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on May 31, 2008 2:32:04 GMT -5
it's coz of votes like these: "Gazza - I like it more. Attire is amazing.""MJH- him and dielawn are the two bets figs of the week nough said " "Spencer- watts with bb's lower body" Anyone can easily be biased and type crap like that out but at least with votes like these: "Cass vs. Dielawn: Both very good figures. But Sabin is far too pale, and the logo goes over the joints. The right forearm is choppy too. The head, albeit very good, is inaccurate foe the time period of the attire. I love the colours on Cass's, and the torso edit is very good. MY VOTE: CASS" more is pointed out making to easier to see if it's biased and it's also helpfull to the person by pointing out points to fix. Honestly I really dont wanna win if all my votes are like "MJH - Better head", I'd much rather get constructive criticism and an opinion on my figure otherwise it just sounds like the person glanced at each figure. Also votes like that feed egos and make people delusional, if someone's getting "amazing attire" votes every week then they dont see their own flaws and never improve. At first i thought that was a voted I did, I was thinking wtf  Then i realised it was Swantons. But Yes. I agree with MJH 100% Here. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 12, 2024 4:14:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2008 7:35:53 GMT -5
it's coz of votes like these: "Gazza - I like it more. Attire is amazing.""MJH- him and dielawn are the two bets figs of the week nough said " "Spencer- watts with bb's lower body" Anyone can easily be biased and type crap like that out but at least with votes like these: "Cass vs. Dielawn: Both very good figures. But Sabin is far too pale, and the logo goes over the joints. The right forearm is choppy too. The head, albeit very good, is inaccurate foe the time period of the attire. I love the colours on Cass's, and the torso edit is very good. MY VOTE: CASS" more is pointed out making to easier to see if it's biased and it's also helpfull to the person by pointing out points to fix. Honestly I really dont wanna win if all my votes are like "MJH - Better head", I'd much rather get constructive criticism and an opinion on my figure otherwise it just sounds like the person glanced at each figure. Also votes like that feed egos and make people delusional, if someone's getting "amazing attire" votes every week then they dont see their own flaws and never improve. At first i thought that was a voted I did, I was thinking wtf Then i realised it was Swantons. But Yes. I agree with MJH 100% Here. Yeah it is mine. I'm gonna start going into detail with my votes. |
|
|
|
Post by cjs. on May 31, 2008 12:17:51 GMT -5
I guess so actually, I can remember a few times I wanted more opinions on my figures.
|
|
![[MJH] Avatar](http://i56.tinypic.com/5x3ote.jpg)
