|
|
Post by Mr. Orange on Dec 7, 2007 19:53:52 GMT -5
Credit: Wrestlinginc.com
The first head to head battle between TNA and WWE's ECW program took place last night with TNA emerging victorious.
Surprisingly, TNA did it's normal 1.1 rating. ECW, not being in it's normal time slot and with apparently not much of it's fan base looking for it, did a 0.6, about half of what it has been doing during it's Tuesday night slot.
It's interesting that TNA's ratings were barely affected when going head to head with ECW last night. The last time TNA went head to head with WWE was when Raw was moved to a Thursday night. Not only did Raw slaughter TNA that night, but TNA drew a much lower than usual rating.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Post by floridaistheman on Dec 7, 2007 19:59:16 GMT -5
Well it wouldn't take much for TNA to beat ECW or SmackDown!. I doubt it will EVER beat RAW on the other hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Dec 7, 2007 20:04:47 GMT -5
Good, I was hoping they would beat ECW in the ratiings..
|
|
Adam3s - V1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 12, 2006 8:41:51 GMT -5
Posts: 1,794
|
Post by Adam3s - V1 on Dec 7, 2007 20:34:49 GMT -5
Although good news nothing to get excited about. People had already been watching Impact's 1st hour and it was taking on a show that was on the wrong night. Trying doing Impact tuesday with it's first hour on during ECW, I doubt the results will be the same.
I like to think TNA is starting to compete but this isn't really a sign of that,
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Dec 7, 2007 22:25:12 GMT -5
I don't think it means shit, TNA got it's normal rating because it was on at the normal time, ECW wasn't, and a lot of people didn't know when it was on and probably figured it wasn't on.
IMO, that's why they got a .6.
|
|
|
|
Post by compton on Dec 7, 2007 22:50:58 GMT -5
I don't think it means ****, TNA got it's normal rating because it was on at the normal time, ECW wasn't, and a lot of people didn't know when it was on and probably figured it wasn't on. IMO, that's why they got a .6. Way to say the exact same thing the guy above you just said  |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Dec 7, 2007 22:51:57 GMT -5
I forgot ecw was even on, I forgot to dvr it...
|
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Dec 7, 2007 22:59:14 GMT -5
That's what happens when you have Big Daddy V and Mark Henry in the main event.
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Dec 7, 2007 23:14:31 GMT -5
Either way, both shows suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Dec 8, 2007 0:00:20 GMT -5
ECW wasn't even on its regular day, this doesn't prove TNA can beat ****.
|
|
|
|
Post by xshawnxwilliamsx on Dec 8, 2007 0:11:30 GMT -5
I'm glad, cause ECW totally sucked yesterday while Impact was pretty good overall.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eyce on Dec 8, 2007 0:29:28 GMT -5
TNA should in theory, have a higher rating if people "preferred" to watch the show over ECW.
Needless to say:
TNA = 1.1
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Dec 8, 2007 1:16:27 GMT -5
TNA should in theory, have a higher rating if people "preferred" to watch the show over ECW. Needless to say: TNA = 1.1The thing is they went agianst ECW & still manged to keep their normal rating.  |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 8, 2007 1:19:51 GMT -5
TNA should in theory, have a higher rating if people "preferred" to watch the show over ECW. Needless to say: TNA = 1.1The thing is they went agianst ECW & still manged to keep their normal rating. Wow, Soder...that's a slighty less optimistic response than I would've expected from you. |
|
|
|
Post by nascar on Dec 8, 2007 9:28:22 GMT -5
Great news to hear ..
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Dec 8, 2007 10:19:24 GMT -5
TNA should in theory, have a higher rating if people "preferred" to watch the show over ECW. Needless to say: TNA = 1.1The thing is they went agianst ECW & still manged to keep their normal rating. It proves nothing. ECW wasn't on it's regular day. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Dec 8, 2007 11:52:11 GMT -5
i didnt even know ECW was on
|
|
Essex James
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 16, 2006 10:10:20 GMT -5
Posts: 727
|
Post by Essex James on Dec 8, 2007 12:01:40 GMT -5
I dont think it's anything to be really chuffed about they beat wwe's 3rd brand  |
|
|
|
Post by htmlegend on Dec 8, 2007 12:51:05 GMT -5
That's good news to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Dec 8, 2007 13:03:30 GMT -5
Well why would you want to watch a bunch of midcarders when you can watch Kurt Angle, Christian, Samoa Joe, etc.
|
|
