|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Dec 8, 2007 14:42:08 GMT -5
I don't think it means ****, TNA got it's normal rating because it was on at the normal time, ECW wasn't, and a lot of people didn't know when it was on and probably figured it wasn't on. IMO, that's why they got a .6. Way to say the exact same thing the guy above you just said  I didn't read the other comments. |
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Dec 8, 2007 15:22:47 GMT -5
cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Dec 8, 2007 17:54:45 GMT -5
The thing is they went agianst ECW & still manged to keep their normal rating.  It proves nothing. ECW wasn't on it's regular day. exactly, the ratings are irrelevant |
|
Kid Lightning
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 21, 2002 17:15:17 GMT -5
Posts: 961
|
Post by Kid Lightning on Dec 8, 2007 18:17:42 GMT -5
I chose to watch Impact over ECW because the show looked more promising and I believe that it was leaps and bounds better. I greatly enjoyed this week's show and putting Henry/Big Daddy V in the main event wasnt even close to changing my mind about which to watch....even if their opponent was CM Punk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Dec 9, 2007 15:28:44 GMT -5
TNA was better than ECW on thursday. ECW was very boring. They built up for who Punk would choose in the main event, but it didnt matter both sucked. I flipped back and forth between shows and TNA was overall better, in the time it took Punk, BDV, and Henry to come to the ring, TNA had already done like 3 good segments
|
|
