|
|
Post by thetaker13 on Dec 9, 2007 17:51:16 GMT -5
he helped kill wcw don't let him kill tna. the only reason he's there is jarret know vince considers him better than everyone
|
|
|
|
Post by thetaker13 on Dec 9, 2007 17:51:48 GMT -5
excuse my spelling
|
|
|
|
Post by moogie101 on Dec 9, 2007 18:01:22 GMT -5
Well as Double J is concentrating on his kids right now & has no plans in near future to return to the ring that is irrelevant.
As for Russo himself, he works well if they is someone to filter his ideas, he didn't have that in WCW which cost the company. In TNA there is a group of people to crack down on his more insane ideas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Dec 9, 2007 18:25:54 GMT -5
I love how everyone is quick to blame Russo. Not everything in TNA is 100% him. You also have Dutch Mantell in there, who I believe does a lot of the booking with Jarrett.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetaker13 on Dec 9, 2007 18:29:15 GMT -5
good points. i draw conclusions too fast
|
|
|
|
Post by thetaker13 on Dec 9, 2007 18:30:13 GMT -5
good points. i draw conclusions too fast
|
|
|
|
Post by alessicustoms2 on Dec 9, 2007 18:36:48 GMT -5
I believe it's Mantell who's doing the main booking alongside Jarret while Russo throws an idea around once and while and has small jobs with peoples characters , and apparently we have JB and Tenay sitting down giving ideas which isn't a problem at all as they were on the booking team before. What I think they should do is Fire Dutch Mantell and Put D'amorre back on the booking Team , because Mantell is the guy who told Shelley that he should change his chain wrestling style and be more spotty ,also isn't a fan of the X division, with that change I believe we would atleast have better wrestling going on in TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Dec 9, 2007 19:35:53 GMT -5
Russo does little actual booking for tna.
|
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Dec 9, 2007 23:03:21 GMT -5
"because Mantell is the guy who told Shelley that he should change his chain wrestling style and be more spotty ,also isn't a fan of the X division."
--------------------------------------------------------
MANTELL RULES!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by compton on Dec 9, 2007 23:37:21 GMT -5
I'm nowhere near being a Russo fan, but I would love to see Dirty Dutch fired and Jarrett removed from the booking team. Panda Electricity or whatever is majority owner in TNA, Dixie has the power to get it done. If she would only pull her head out of her ass...
|
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Dec 9, 2007 23:54:45 GMT -5
Jarrett owns part of TNA a.k.a A Partner. No one can fire him unless he sells his share, and if Panda or Carter tries to force a buy out; there will be a major law suit!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Dec 10, 2007 3:56:33 GMT -5
Must be just a coincidence that the same terrible angles from Russo era WCW are brought back slightly diffrent.
|
|
|
|
Post by compton on Dec 11, 2007 20:52:46 GMT -5
Jarrett owns part of TNA a.k.a A Partner. No one can fire him unless he sells his share, and if Panda or Carter tries to force a buy out; there will be a major law suit! He can't be fired, but he can probably be removed from the booking team. |
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Dec 11, 2007 23:56:21 GMT -5
It's Jarrett's and Mantel's fault!
|
|
Dave Grohl
Main Eventer
Elite Trader
Proud LEADER of the Elite and member of the West Coast Posse
Joined on: Jan 20, 2002 20:14:24 GMT -5
Posts: 3,341
|
Post by Dave Grohl on Dec 12, 2007 12:55:56 GMT -5
Why is anyone bashing TNA when there product is about 6-7 times more entertaining than ANY of the other three shows(brands) we have to watch here in the states? I DVR smackdown every week and every week I watch about a combined 3 minutes of it. Raw isn't much better these days and ECW...well that is a complete and UTTER disgrace to the name and legacy of ECW. TNA's storylines whether you like them or not and their roster is so far much more entertaining than any of the three WWE brands is my point here.
|
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Dec 12, 2007 14:45:24 GMT -5
Why is anyone bashing TNA when there product is about 6-7 times more entertaining than ANY of the other three shows(brands) we have to watch here in the states? I DVR smackdown every week and every week I watch about a combined 3 minutes of it. Raw isn't much better these days and ECW...well that is a complete and UTTER disgrace to the name and legacy of ECW. TNA's storylines whether you like them or not and their roster is so far much more entertaining than any of the three WWE brands is my point here. Agreed; 100%! |
|
|
|
Post by compton on Dec 12, 2007 16:29:56 GMT -5
Why is anyone bashing TNA when there product is about 6-7 times more entertaining than ANY of the other three shows(brands) we have to watch here in the states? I DVR smackdown every week and every week I watch about a combined 3 minutes of it. Raw isn't much better these days and ECW...well that is a complete and UTTER disgrace to the name and legacy of ECW. TNA's storylines whether you like them or not and their roster is so far much more entertaining than any of the three WWE brands is my point here. Agreed; 100%! I agree too, but that doesn't mean that TNA does not have it's shitty moments that they really need to improve. |
|
Kick Your Face
Main Eventer
Real Join Date: Sep 2003
Joined on: Nov 25, 2007 17:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,141
|
Post by Kick Your Face on Dec 12, 2007 16:34:26 GMT -5
R.I.P.
|
|
|
|
Post by fallenhero on Dec 13, 2007 1:46:22 GMT -5
Why is anyone bashing TNA when there product is about 6-7 times more entertaining than ANY of the other three shows(brands) we have to watch here in the states? I DVR smackdown every week and every week I watch about a combined 3 minutes of it. Raw isn't much better these days and ECW...well that is a complete and UTTER disgrace to the name and legacy of ECW. TNA's storylines whether you like them or not and their roster is so far much more entertaining than any of the three WWE brands is my point here. Three letters: ROH. I'll give you an analogy of sorts: Puroresu > ROH > WWE > other indies > dog crap > Lucha Libre > TNA. |
|
|
|
Post by compton on Dec 13, 2007 3:32:14 GMT -5
Why is anyone bashing TNA when there product is about 6-7 times more entertaining than ANY of the other three shows(brands) we have to watch here in the states? I DVR smackdown every week and every week I watch about a combined 3 minutes of it. Raw isn't much better these days and ECW...well that is a complete and UTTER disgrace to the name and legacy of ECW. TNA's storylines whether you like them or not and their roster is so far much more entertaining than any of the three WWE brands is my point here. Three letters: ROH. I'll give you an analogy of sorts: Puroresu > ROH > WWE > other indies > dog crap > Lucha Libre > TNA. You were so close. Here's how it should look: Puroresu/Luch Libre (it's a tie) > ROH > TNA > other indies > dog crap > WWE > you |
|
